%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : MGT036-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 01:57:16 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 31.01s % Output : Refutation 31.01s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14740/MGT/MGT036-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing .............. done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 2] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 4] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 22] [nf = 0] [nu = 3] [ut = 5] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 164] [nf = 2] [nu = 29] [ut = 9] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 1332] [nf = 20] [nu = 471] [ut = 17] % Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 4321] [nf = 149] [nu = 1797] [ut = 17] % Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 14342] [nf = 420] [nu = 6643] [ut = 20] % Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 44353] [nf = 2053] [nu = 21543] [ut = 20] % Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 139857] [nf = 5301] [nu = 69504] [ut = 20] % Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 399724] [nf = 22042] [nu = 198490] [ut = 20] % Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ... % t = 2 secs [nr = 1190903] [nf = 61913] [nu = 590484] [ut = 20] % Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ... % t = 6 secs [nr = 3393641] [nf = 217851] [nu = 1665117] [ut = 20] % Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ... % t = 18 secs [nr = 9844540] [nf = 631936] [nu = 4786288] [ut = 20] % Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ... % Entering time slice 2 % Updating parameters ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 31 secs [nr = 16817361] [nf = 1188691] [nu = 8110806] [ut = 20] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 31 secs [nr = 16817419] [nf = 1188691] [nu = 8110827] [ut = 21] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 31 secs [nr = 16817932] [nf = 1188699] [nu = 8110985] [ut = 22] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: environment_1(sk1_0()) % B7: ~environment_1(x0) | ~subpopulations_4(x1,x2,x0,x3) | subpopulations_4(x2,x1,x0,x3) % B8: ~environment_1(x0) | ~subpopulations_4(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),x0,x1) | in_environment_2(x0,x1) % B9: ~environment_1(x0) | ~outcompetes_3(x2,x1,x3) | ~subpopulations_4(x1,x2,x0,x3) | greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(x1,x3)) % B10: ~environment_1(x0) | ~outcompetes_3(x2,x1,x3) | ~subpopulations_4(x1,x2,x0,x3) | greater_or_equal_2(growth_rate_2(x2,x3),zero_0()) % B12: ~environment_1(x0) | ~greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(x3,x1)) | ~greater_2(resilience_1(x3),resilience_1(x2)) | ~in_environment_2(x0,x1) | greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(x2,x1)) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c4 t4 td1 b nc > subpopulations_4(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),sk1_0(),sk2_0()) % U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c3 t3 td1 b nc > outcompetes_3(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),sk2_0()) % U3: < d0 v0 dv0 f2 c2 t4 td2 b > greater_2(resilience_1(efficient_producers_0()),resilience_1(first_movers_0())) % U4: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c4 t4 td1 > subpopulations_4(efficient_producers_0(),first_movers_0(),sk1_0(),sk2_0()) % U5: < d3 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 > greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(efficient_producers_0(),sk2_0())) % U13: < d4 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 > ~greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(),sk2_0())) % U20: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 > in_environment_2(sk1_0(),sk2_0()) % U22: < d4 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 > greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(),sk2_0())) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U1: % subpopulations_4(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),sk1_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U1 % Derivation of unit clause U2: % outcompetes_3(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U2 % Derivation of unit clause U3: % greater_2(resilience_1(efficient_producers_0()),resilience_1(first_movers_0())) ....... U3 % Derivation of unit clause U4: % environment_1(sk1_0()) ....... B0 % ~environment_1(x0) | ~subpopulations_4(x1,x2,x0,x3) | subpopulations_4(x2,x1,x0,x3) ....... B7 % ~subpopulations_4(x0, x1, sk1_0(), x2) | subpopulations_4(x1, x0, sk1_0(), x2) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B7:L0] % subpopulations_4(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),sk1_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U1 % subpopulations_4(efficient_producers_0(), first_movers_0(), sk1_0(), sk2_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U5: % environment_1(sk1_0()) ....... B0 % ~environment_1(x0) | ~outcompetes_3(x2,x1,x3) | ~subpopulations_4(x1,x2,x0,x3) | greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(x1,x3)) ....... B9 % ~outcompetes_3(x0, x1, x2) | ~subpopulations_4(x1, x0, sk1_0(), x2) | greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(x1, x2)) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B9:L0] % outcompetes_3(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U2 % ~subpopulations_4(efficient_producers_0(), first_movers_0(), sk1_0(), sk2_0()) | greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(efficient_producers_0(), sk2_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U2:L0] % subpopulations_4(efficient_producers_0(),first_movers_0(),sk1_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U4 % greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(efficient_producers_0(), sk2_0())) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U4:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U13: % environment_1(sk1_0()) ....... B0 % ~environment_1(x0) | ~outcompetes_3(x2,x1,x3) | ~subpopulations_4(x1,x2,x0,x3) | greater_or_equal_2(growth_rate_2(x2,x3),zero_0()) ....... B10 % ~outcompetes_3(x0, x1, x2) | ~subpopulations_4(x1, x0, sk1_0(), x2) | greater_or_equal_2(growth_rate_2(x0, x2), zero_0()) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B10:L0] % outcompetes_3(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U2 % ~subpopulations_4(efficient_producers_0(), first_movers_0(), sk1_0(), sk2_0()) | greater_or_equal_2(growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(), sk2_0()), zero_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U2:L0] % ~greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(x0,x1)) | ~greater_or_equal_2(growth_rate_2(x0,x1),zero_0()) ....... B6 % ~subpopulations_4(efficient_producers_0(), first_movers_0(), sk1_0(), sk2_0()) | ~greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(), sk2_0())) ....... R3 [R2:L1, B6:L1] % subpopulations_4(efficient_producers_0(),first_movers_0(),sk1_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U4 % ~greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(), sk2_0())) ....... R4 [R3:L0, U4:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U20: % environment_1(sk1_0()) ....... B0 % ~environment_1(x0) | ~subpopulations_4(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),x0,x1) | in_environment_2(x0,x1) ....... B8 % ~subpopulations_4(first_movers_0(), efficient_producers_0(), sk1_0(), x0) | in_environment_2(sk1_0(), x0) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B8:L0] % subpopulations_4(first_movers_0(),efficient_producers_0(),sk1_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U1 % in_environment_2(sk1_0(), sk2_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U22: % environment_1(sk1_0()) ....... B0 % ~environment_1(x0) | ~greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(x3,x1)) | ~greater_2(resilience_1(x3),resilience_1(x2)) | ~in_environment_2(x0,x1) | greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(x2,x1)) ....... B12 % ~greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(x0, x1)) | ~greater_2(resilience_1(x0), resilience_1(x2)) | ~in_environment_2(sk1_0(), x1) | greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(x2, x1)) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B12:L0] % greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(efficient_producers_0(),sk2_0())) ....... U5 % ~greater_2(resilience_1(efficient_producers_0()), resilience_1(x0)) | ~in_environment_2(sk1_0(), sk2_0()) | greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(x0, sk2_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U5:L0] % greater_2(resilience_1(efficient_producers_0()),resilience_1(first_movers_0())) ....... U3 % ~in_environment_2(sk1_0(), sk2_0()) | greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(), sk2_0())) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U3:L0] % in_environment_2(sk1_0(),sk2_0()) ....... U20 % greater_2(zero_0(), growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(), sk2_0())) ....... R4 [R3:L0, U20:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(),sk2_0())) ....... U22 % ~greater_2(zero_0(),growth_rate_2(first_movers_0(),sk2_0())) ....... U13 % [] ....... R1 [U22:L0, U13:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 18007558 % resolvents: 16818855 factors: 1188703 % Number of unit clauses generated: 8111406 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 45.04 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 4 [2] = 2 [3] = 5 % [4] = 9 [6] = 3 % Total = 23 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 8111406 [2] = 7099307 [3] = 2796780 [4] = 53 [5] = 12 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] environment_1 (+)2 (-)0 % [1] greater_2 (+)3 (-)1 % [2] greater_or_equal_2 (+)1 (-)1 % [3] in_environment_2 (+)2 (-)0 % [4] outcompetes_3 (+)1 (-)3 % [5] subpopulations_4 (+)9 (-)0 % ------------------ % Total: (+)18 (-)5 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 23 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 4977434 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 17 % Number of successful unifications: 18007573 % Number of unification failures: 1151621 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 6 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 43914049 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 17595703 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 33 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 5202151 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 4 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 2 % Number of states in UCFA table: 53 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 78 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.68 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 47 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 19159194 % ConstructUnitClause() = 5202170 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 6.41 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: 580889 % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 31 secs % CPU time: 31.00 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------