%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem : MGT036-2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:32 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.52s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT036-2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 12:36:39 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.46 start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.52 % Version : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.24/0.52 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.52 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.52 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1, axiom, (subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(d2_9, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', d2_9)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(prove_t5_13, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t5_13)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(prove_t5_12, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t5_12)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(mp_growth_rate_relationships_3, axiom, (environment(X1)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_growth_rate_relationships_3)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(prove_t5_14, negated_conjecture, (outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t5_14)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(d2_8, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', d2_8)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(a13_11, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))|~environment(X1)|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', a13_11)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(mp_growth_rate_relationships_5, axiom, (~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_growth_rate_relationships_5)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(mp_time_point_occur_2, axiom, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_time_point_occur_2)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(a2_10, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', a2_10)).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_12, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d2_9])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)), c_0_11).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), prove_t5_13).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1)), prove_t5_12).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (environment(X1)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_growth_rate_relationships_3])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_17, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), c_0_12).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk1,sk2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), c_0_15])])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2)), prove_t5_14).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_20, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d2_8])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (environment(X1)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3))), c_0_16).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_19]), c_0_15])])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_23, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))|~environment(X1)|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a13_11])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_24, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), c_0_20).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (environment(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_26, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))|~environment(X1)|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2))), c_0_23).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_27, plain, (~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_growth_rate_relationships_5])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_28, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~outcompetes(X1,X3,X2)|~subpopulations(X3,X1,X4,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_29, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~in_environment(X4,X2)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_21])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_30, plain, (~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))), c_0_27).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,sk2),zero)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_18]), c_0_19])])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_32, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_time_point_occur_2])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,sk2))|~greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(X1))|~in_environment(X2,sk2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_22])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_34, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), a2_10).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, (~greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,sk2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_36, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), c_0_32).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_37, hypothesis, (~in_environment(X1,sk2)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34]), c_0_35])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_38, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_25])])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_39, hypothesis, (~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])).
% 0.24/0.52 cnf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_39]), ['proof']).
% 0.24/0.52 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.24/0.52 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.52 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.52 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.52 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.52 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.24/0.52 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.24/0.52
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------