%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem : MGT036-3 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:32 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.54s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT036-3 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 12:45:22 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.47 start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.54 % Version : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.22/0.54 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.54 % Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.54 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(d2_2, hypothesis, (outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', d2_2)).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(prove_t5_star_9, negated_conjecture, (~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t5_star_9)).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(a13_star_8, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', a13_star_8)).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(a13_star_6, hypothesis, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', a13_star_6)).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(a13_star_5, hypothesis, (environment(sk1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', a13_star_5)).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1, axiom, (subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1)).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(a13_star_7, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,sk2),zero)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', a13_star_7)).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_7, hypothesis, (outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d2_2])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_t5_star_9])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_9, hypothesis, (outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))), c_0_7).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_10, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))), a13_star_8).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2)), c_0_8).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_12, hypothesis, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), a13_star_6).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_13, hypothesis, (environment(sk1)), a13_star_5).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_14, plain, (subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_15, hypothesis, (outcompetes(X1,efficient_producers,sk2)|~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,sk2),zero)|~subpopulations(efficient_producers,X1,X2,sk2)|~environment(X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_16, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,sk2),zero)), a13_star_7).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13])])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)), c_0_14).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_19, hypothesis, (~subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,sk2)|~environment(X1)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_20, hypothesis, (subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk1,sk2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_12]), c_0_13])])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c_0_21, hypothesis, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20]), c_0_13])]), ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.54 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.54 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.54 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.22/0.54 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.54 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.54 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.54 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.54
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------