↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.SAT-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT038-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.10s 0.41s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT038-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:49:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.40  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.10/0.40  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 0.10/0.40  #
% 0.10/0.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.40  # Number of axioms: 12 Number of unprocessed: 12
% 0.10/0.40  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.10/0.40  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.10/0.40  # Hello from C++
% 0.10/0.40  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.10/0.40  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.10/0.40  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.10/0.40  # 12 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.10/0.40  # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
% 0.10/0.40  # There are 3 start rule candidates:
% 0.10/0.40  # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.10/0.40  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.10/0.40  # 3 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.10/0.40  # 9 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.10/0.40  # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.10/0.40  
% 0.10/0.40  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.10/0.40  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
% 0.10/0.40  # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.10/0.40  # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on
% 0.10/0.40  # 1558262 Satisfiable branch
% 0.10/0.41  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.10/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.10/0.41  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  # End clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.41  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk3))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (stable(sk3))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (finite_set(first_movers))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (cardinality_at_time(first_movers,to)!=zero|~greater(X1,appear(first_movers,sk3))|~in_environment(sk3,X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (in_environment(X1,appear(first_movers,X1))|~stable(X1)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_20, hypothesis, (contracts_from(sk2(X1),first_movers)|~stable(X1)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_21, hypothesis, (greater(appear(efficient_producers,e),appear(first_movers,X1))|~environment(X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (cardinality_at_time(s,t2)=zero|~contracts_from(X1,X2)|~finite_set(X2))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_19, hypothesis, (greater(sk2(X1),appear(efficient_producers,X1))|~stable(X1)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (greater(sk1(X1,X2),X1)|~contracts_from(X1,X2)|~finite_set(X2))).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X3)|~in_environment(X1,X3)|~stable(X1)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.10/0.41  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.10/0.41  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.10/0.41  # Found 5 steps
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk3)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (environment(sk3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_146, plain, (~stable(sk3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_145, plain, (contracts_from(sk2(sk3),first_movers)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.10/0.41  cnf(i_0_183, plain, (~finite_set(first_movers)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.10/0.41  # End printing tableau
% 0.10/0.41  # SZS output end
% 0.10/0.41  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.10/0.41  # Child (1558262) has found a proof.
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  # Proof search is over...
% 0.10/0.41  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------