↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT039+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT039+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:53:37 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.23/0.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.23/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.23/0.54  SPASS derived 125 clauses, backtracked 7 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 117 clauses.
% 0.23/0.54  SPASS allocated 97775 KBytes.
% 0.23/0.54  SPASS spent	0:00:00.17 on the problem.
% 0.23/0.54  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.23/0.54  		0:00:00.05 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.23/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.23/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.23/0.54  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  
% 0.23/0.54  Here is a proof with depth 8, length 56 :
% 0.23/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.23/0.54  1[0:Inp] ||  -> observational_period(skc1)*.
% 0.23/0.54  2[0:Inp] ||  -> slow_change(skc1)*.
% 0.23/0.54  3[0:Inp] ||  -> propagation_strategy(first_movers)*.
% 0.23/0.54  4[0:Inp] ||  -> propagation_strategy(efficient_producers)*.
% 0.23/0.54  5[0:Inp] ||  -> environment(skf2(u))*.
% 0.23/0.54  6[0:Inp] || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skc1)* -> .
% 0.23/0.54  7[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 0.23/0.54  8[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 0.23/0.54  9[0:Inp] environment(u) ||  -> greater_or_equal(critical_point(u),start_time(u))*.
% 0.23/0.54  10[0:Inp] || greater_or_equal(u,v)* -> equal(u,v) greater(u,v).
% 0.23/0.54  11[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(end_time(u),v)*.
% 0.23/0.54  12[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.23/0.54  13[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater_or_equal(v,start_time(u))*+ greater_or_equal(end_time(u),v)* -> in_environment(u,v).
% 0.23/0.54  15[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v)* greater(v,critical_point(u))+ -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,v)*.
% 0.23/0.54  16[0:Inp] observational_period(u) || propagation_strategy(efficient_producers) propagation_strategy(first_movers) -> in_environment(u,skf2(u))* selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,u)*.
% 0.23/0.54  17[0:Inp] environment(u) slow_change(v) observational_period(v) || in_environment(v,u)*+ -> in_environment(u,skf3(u))*.
% 0.23/0.54  18[0:Inp] environment(u) slow_change(v) observational_period(v) || in_environment(v,u)* -> greater(skf3(u),critical_point(u)).
% 0.23/0.54  19[0:Inp] observational_period(u) || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(u)))* propagation_strategy(efficient_producers) propagation_strategy(first_movers) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,u).
% 0.23/0.54  20[0:MRR:16.1,16.2,4.0,3.0] observational_period(u) ||  -> in_environment(u,skf2(u))* selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,u)*.
% 0.23/0.54  21[0:MRR:19.2,19.3,4.0,3.0] observational_period(u) || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(u)))* -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,u).
% 0.23/0.54  24[0:Res:1.0,18.0] slow_change(skc1) environment(u) || in_environment(skc1,u)* -> greater(skf3(u),critical_point(u)).
% 0.23/0.54  28[0:Res:21.2,6.0] observational_period(skc1) || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))* -> .
% 0.23/0.54  29[0:Res:20.2,6.0] observational_period(skc1) ||  -> in_environment(skc1,skf2(skc1))*.
% 0.23/0.54  31[0:MRR:29.0,1.0] ||  -> in_environment(skc1,skf2(skc1))*.
% 0.23/0.54  32[0:MRR:28.0,1.0] || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))* -> .
% 0.23/0.54  34[0:MRR:24.0,2.0] environment(u) || in_environment(skc1,u)* -> greater(skf3(u),critical_point(u)).
% 0.23/0.54  38[0:Res:11.2,10.0] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v)* -> equal(end_time(u),v) greater(end_time(u),v).
% 0.23/0.54  39[0:Res:9.1,10.0] environment(u) ||  -> equal(start_time(u),critical_point(u)) greater(critical_point(u),start_time(u))*r.
% 0.23/0.54  40[0:Res:7.1,13.1] environment(u) || greater(v,start_time(u)) greater_or_equal(end_time(u),v)* -> in_environment(u,v).
% 0.23/0.54  48[0:Res:31.0,17.3] environment(skf2(skc1)) slow_change(skc1) observational_period(skc1) ||  -> in_environment(skf2(skc1),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.23/0.54  52[0:SSi:48.2,48.1,48.0,2.0,1.0,2.0,1.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] ||  -> in_environment(skf2(skc1),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.23/0.54  63[0:Res:31.0,34.1] environment(skf2(skc1)) ||  -> greater(skf3(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))*l.
% 0.23/0.54  67[0:SSi:63.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] ||  -> greater(skf3(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))*l.
% 0.23/0.54  68[0:Res:67.0,15.2] environment(skf2(skc1)) || in_environment(skf2(skc1),skf3(skf2(skc1))) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.23/0.54  71[0:SSi:68.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || in_environment(skf2(skc1),skf3(skf2(skc1))) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.23/0.54  72[0:MRR:71.0,52.0] ||  -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.23/0.54  91[0:Res:52.0,38.1] environment(skf2(skc1)) ||  -> equal(skf3(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1))) greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*r.
% 0.23/0.54  93[0:SSi:91.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] ||  -> equal(skf3(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1))) greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*r.
% 0.23/0.54  102[1:Spt:93.0] ||  -> equal(skf3(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1)))**.
% 0.23/0.54  105[1:Rew:102.0,72.0] ||  -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.23/0.54  108[1:MRR:105.0,32.0] ||  -> .
% 0.23/0.54  109[1:Spt:108.0,93.0,102.0] || equal(skf3(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1)))** -> .
% 0.23/0.54  110[1:Spt:108.0,93.1] ||  -> greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*r.
% 0.23/0.54  115[0:Res:8.1,40.2] environment(u) || equal(end_time(u),v) greater(v,start_time(u)) -> in_environment(u,v)*.
% 0.23/0.54  120[1:OCh:12.1,12.0,67.0,110.0] ||  -> greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))*r.
% 0.23/0.54  123[1:Res:120.0,15.2] environment(skf2(skc1)) || in_environment(skf2(skc1),end_time(skf2(skc1))) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.23/0.54  126[1:SSi:123.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || in_environment(skf2(skc1),end_time(skf2(skc1))) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.23/0.54  127[1:MRR:126.1,32.0] || in_environment(skf2(skc1),end_time(skf2(skc1)))* -> .
% 0.23/0.54  167[1:Res:115.3,127.0] environment(skf2(skc1)) || equal(end_time(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1))) greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),start_time(skf2(skc1)))*r -> .
% 0.23/0.54  170[1:Obv:167.1] environment(skf2(skc1)) || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),start_time(skf2(skc1)))*r -> .
% 0.23/0.54  171[1:SSi:170.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),start_time(skf2(skc1)))*r -> .
% 0.23/0.54  183[1:NCh:12.2,12.1,171.0,39.2] environment(skf2(skc1)) || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1))) -> equal(start_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))**.
% 0.23/0.54  186[1:SSi:183.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1))) -> equal(start_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))**.
% 0.23/0.54  187[1:MRR:186.0,120.0] ||  -> equal(start_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))**.
% 0.23/0.54  190[1:Rew:187.0,171.0] || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))*r -> .
% 0.23/0.54  193[1:MRR:190.0,120.0] ||  -> .
% 0.23/0.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.23/0.54  Formulae used in the proof : prove_t8 mp_organizational_sets1 mp_organizational_sets2 mp3_favoured_trategy mp_greater_or_equal mp_time_of_critical_point mp_environment_end_point mp_greater_transitivity mp_time_in_environment l8 mp4_critical_point
% 0.23/0.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------