%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : MGT040+2 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n006.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Jan 17 20:29:20 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.47s % Output : FiniteModel 23.47s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT040+2 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.22 % Computer : n006.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.22 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.22 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.22 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.22 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.22 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.22 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 17:28:48 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : % 23.47/11.70 Nitpicking formula... % 23.47/11.70 Timestamp: 17:28:57 % 23.47/11.70 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 23.47/11.70 able to skip some scopes % 23.47/11.70 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.47/11.70 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.47/11.70 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.47/11.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.47/11.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.47/11.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.47/11.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.47/11.70 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.47/11.70 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.47/11.70 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2: % 23.47/11.70 % 23.47/11.70 Skolem constant: % 23.47/11.70 P = i1 % 23.47/11.70 Constants: % 23.47/11.70 bnd_an_organisation = i1 % 23.47/11.70 bnd_appear = % 23.47/11.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.47/11.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1), % 23.47/11.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1)) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_critical_point = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_efficient_producers = i1 % 23.47/11.70 bnd_empty = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_end_time = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1, i2 := i1) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_environment = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_extreme = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_first_movers = i2 % 23.47/11.70 bnd_greater = % 23.47/11.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.47/11.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True), % 23.47/11.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True)) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_greater_or_equal = % 23.47/11.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.47/11.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False), % 23.47/11.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True)) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_in_environment = % 23.47/11.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.47/11.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True), % 23.47/11.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True)) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_observational_period = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_propagation_strategy = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_rapid_change = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False) % 23.47/11.70 bnd_selection_favors = % 23.47/11.70 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.47/11.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.47/11.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False), % 23.47/11.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)), % 23.47/11.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.47/11.70 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False), % 23.47/11.70 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False))) % 23.47/11.70 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.47/11.70 Total time: 1.4 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------