%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MGT040-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:26:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.11s 0.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_21ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_49ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
propagation_strategy(first_movers),
mp_organizational_sets1_28,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
propagation_strategy(efficient_producers),
mp_organizational_sets2_29,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2
| greater(X1,X2) ),
c_0_21,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
| greater_or_equal(X2,appear(efficient_producers,X1))
| greater(appear(efficient_producers,X1),X2) ),
c_0_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2),
c_0_23,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
( ~ greater(critical_point(X1),X2)
| ~ greater_or_equal(X2,appear(efficient_producers,X1))
| ~ in_environment(X1,critical_point(X1))
| ~ environment(X1)
| selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2) ),
c_0_24,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
( ~ greater(appear(efficient_producers,X1),X2)
| ~ greater_or_equal(X2,appear(first_movers,X1))
| ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
| ~ environment(X1)
| selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2) ),
c_0_25,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ observational_period(X1)
| selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1)
| in_environment(X1,sk1(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
observational_period(sk2),
prove_t9_39,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ observational_period(X1)
| environment(sk1(X1))
| selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ extreme(sk2),
c_0_30,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ empty(X2)
| ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
| ~ environment(X2)
| ~ observational_period(X1)
| extreme(X1) ),
c_0_31,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( ~ in_environment(X2,X1)
| greater(X1,appear(efficient_producers,X2))
| greater(appear(efficient_producers,X2),X1)
| X1 = appear(efficient_producers,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ greater(critical_point(X1),X2)
| ~ greater_or_equal(X2,appear(efficient_producers,X1))
| ~ environment(X1)
| selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,end_time(X1))
| in_environment(X1,critical_point(X1)) ),
c_0_35,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
( ~ environment(X1)
| ~ in_environment(X1,critical_point(X1))
| ~ greater(critical_point(X1),sk2)
| ~ greater_or_equal(sk2,appear(efficient_producers,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
( ~ environment(X1)
| ~ in_environment(X1,sk2)
| ~ greater(appear(efficient_producers,X1),sk2)
| ~ greater_or_equal(sk2,appear(first_movers,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ~ environment(X1)
| greater(critical_point(X1),end_time(X1))
| in_environment(X1,critical_point(X1)) ),
c_0_39,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
( selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk2)
| in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
( environment(sk1(sk2))
| selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_41]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ environment(X1)
| greater_or_equal(end_time(X1),appear(an_organisation,X1))
| empty(X1) ),
c_0_43,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
( ~ environment(X1)
| ~ in_environment(sk2,X1)
| ~ empty(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_41])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ in_environment(X2,critical_point(X2))
| ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
| ~ environment(X2)
| ~ rapid_change(X1)
| ~ observational_period(X1) ),
c_0_46,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ environment(X1)
| in_environment(X1,end_time(X1)) ),
c_0_47,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ observational_period(X1)
| ~ selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(sk1(X1)))
| selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
rapid_change(sk2),
prove_t9_40,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT040-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:25:17 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2150613 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with pid 2150619 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % No proof found!
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses : 20
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.11/0.45 % Processed clauses : 45
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.11/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Generated clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Paramodulations : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 200
% 0.11/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1337
% 0.11/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 66
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.000 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------