↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT046+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:55 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.06s 1.37s
% Output   : Refutation 1.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT046+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.06/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:09:56 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.06/1.37  
% 1.06/1.37  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.06/1.37  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.06/1.37  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.06/1.37  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.06/1.37  SPASS derived 2079 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 1089 clauses.
% 1.06/1.37  SPASS allocated 99575 KBytes.
% 1.06/1.37  SPASS spent	0:00:01.01 on the problem.
% 1.06/1.37  		0:00:00.05 for the input.
% 1.06/1.37  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.06/1.37  		0:00:00.06 for inferences.
% 1.06/1.37  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 1.06/1.37  		0:00:00.81 for the reduction.
% 1.06/1.37  
% 1.06/1.37  
% 1.06/1.37  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 32 :
% 1.06/1.37  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.06/1.37  1[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(skc3)*.
% 1.06/1.37  2[0:Inp] || has_endowment(skc3)* -> .
% 1.06/1.37  3[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(skc3,skc4),age(skc3,skc5))*r.
% 1.06/1.37  5[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) -> smaller_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 1.06/1.37  6[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 1.06/1.37  10[0:Inp] || smaller(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc5))* -> .
% 1.06/1.37  12[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v)* -> has_endowment(u).
% 1.06/1.37  14[0:Inp] organization(u) ||  -> equal(internal_friction(u,v),internal_friction(u,w))*.
% 1.06/1.37  18[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(external_ties(u,v),external_ties(u,w))* -> greater(position(u,v),position(u,w)).
% 1.06/1.37  20[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),age(u,w))* -> greater(stock_of_knowledge(u,v),stock_of_knowledge(u,w)).
% 1.06/1.37  21[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),age(u,w))* -> greater(external_ties(u,v),external_ties(u,w)).
% 1.06/1.37  24[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(stock_of_knowledge(u,v),stock_of_knowledge(u,w)) smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(u,v),internal_friction(u,w))* -> greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w)).
% 1.06/1.37  27[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w)) greater_or_equal(position(u,v),position(u,w)) -> has_immunity(u,v) has_immunity(u,w) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),hazard_of_mortality(u,w))*.
% 1.06/1.37  39[0:Res:1.0,12.0] || has_immunity(skc3,u)* -> has_endowment(skc3).
% 1.06/1.37  43[0:Res:27.3,10.0] organization(skc3) || greater_or_equal(position(skc3,skc4),position(skc3,skc5))* greater(capability(skc3,skc4),capability(skc3,skc5)) -> has_immunity(skc3,skc5) has_immunity(skc3,skc4).
% 1.06/1.37  50[0:Res:3.0,21.1] organization(skc3) ||  -> greater(external_ties(skc3,skc4),external_ties(skc3,skc5))*r.
% 1.06/1.37  51[0:Res:3.0,20.1] organization(skc3) ||  -> greater(stock_of_knowledge(skc3,skc4),stock_of_knowledge(skc3,skc5))*r.
% 1.06/1.37  52[0:MRR:39.1,2.0] || has_immunity(skc3,u)* -> .
% 1.06/1.37  53[0:MRR:50.0,1.0] ||  -> greater(external_ties(skc3,skc4),external_ties(skc3,skc5))*r.
% 1.06/1.37  54[0:MRR:51.0,1.0] ||  -> greater(stock_of_knowledge(skc3,skc4),stock_of_knowledge(skc3,skc5))*r.
% 1.06/1.37  57[0:MRR:43.0,43.3,43.4,1.0,52.0,52.0] || greater(capability(skc3,skc4),capability(skc3,skc5)) greater_or_equal(position(skc3,skc4),position(skc3,skc5))* -> .
% 1.06/1.37  258[0:Res:6.1,57.1] || greater(position(skc3,skc4),position(skc3,skc5))*r greater(capability(skc3,skc4),capability(skc3,skc5)) -> .
% 1.06/1.37  263[0:Res:53.0,18.1] organization(skc3) ||  -> greater(position(skc3,skc4),position(skc3,skc5))*r.
% 1.06/1.37  275[0:SSi:263.0,1.0] ||  -> greater(position(skc3,skc4),position(skc3,skc5))*r.
% 1.06/1.37  277[0:MRR:258.0,275.0] || greater(capability(skc3,skc4),capability(skc3,skc5))*r -> .
% 1.06/1.37  347[0:SpL:14.1,24.2] organization(u) organization(u) || greater(stock_of_knowledge(u,v),stock_of_knowledge(u,w))* smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(u,x),internal_friction(u,w))* -> greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w)).
% 1.06/1.37  352[0:Obv:347.0] organization(u) || greater(stock_of_knowledge(u,v),stock_of_knowledge(u,w))*+ smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(u,x),internal_friction(u,w))* -> greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w)).
% 1.06/1.37  2354[0:Res:54.0,352.1] organization(skc3) || smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(skc3,u),internal_friction(skc3,skc5))* -> greater(capability(skc3,skc4),capability(skc3,skc5)).
% 1.06/1.37  2388[0:SSi:2354.0,1.0] || smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(skc3,u),internal_friction(skc3,skc5))* -> greater(capability(skc3,skc4),capability(skc3,skc5)).
% 1.06/1.37  2389[0:MRR:2388.1,277.0] || smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(skc3,u),internal_friction(skc3,skc5))* -> .
% 1.06/1.37  2399[0:Res:5.1,2389.0] || equal(internal_friction(skc3,u),internal_friction(skc3,skc5))* -> .
% 1.06/1.37  2400[0:Obv:2399.0] ||  -> .
% 1.06/1.37  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.06/1.37  Formulae used in the proof : theorem_1 definition_smaller_or_equal definition_greater_or_equal assumption_1 assumption_9 assumption_6 assumption_7 assumption_8 assumption_5 assumption_4
% 1.06/1.37  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------