↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT047+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.01s 1.44s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT047+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:11:45 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m
% 0.12/0.39  # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 0.12/0.39  #
% 0.12/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.39  # Number of axioms: 40 Number of unprocessed: 40
% 0.12/0.39  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.39  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.39  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.39  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.39  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.39  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.39  # 40 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.39  # Creating start rules for all 7 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.39  # There are 7 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.39  # Found 8 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.39  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.39  # 7 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.39  # 32 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.39  # 8 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.39  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 7
% 0.12/0.39  # Returning from population with 16 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.39  # We now have 16 tableaux to operate on
% 8.01/1.44  # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 8.01/1.44  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 8.01/1.44  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 8.01/1.44  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 8.01/1.44  # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 8.01/1.44  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 8.01/1.44  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 8.01/1.44  # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 8.01/1.44  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.01/1.44  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.01/1.44  # Begin clausification derivation
% 8.01/1.44  
% 8.01/1.44  # End clausification derivation
% 8.01/1.44  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (has_endowment(esk3_0))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (organization(esk3_0))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk5_0),eta))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk3_0,esk6_0),eta))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk4_0),age(esk3_0,esk5_0)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk3_0,esk7_0),age(esk3_0,esk6_0)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (organization(X1)|~has_endowment(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk4_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0))|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),eta))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (epred2_3(X1,X2,X3)|~organization(X3))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),eta))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk2_1(X1)),eta)|~has_immunity(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~organization(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (internal_friction(X1,X2)=internal_friction(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (has_immunity(X1,esk2_1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|~has_immunity(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~organization(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (position(X1,X2)=position(X1,X3)|external_ties(X1,X2)!=external_ties(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (epred1_3(X1,X2,X3)|has_immunity(X3,X1)|has_immunity(X3,X2)|~organization(X3))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (greater(position(X1,X2),position(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(external_ties(X1,X2),external_ties(X1,X3)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),age(X1,X3)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greater(external_ties(X1,X2),external_ties(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),age(X1,X3)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (has_immunity(X1,esk2_1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk2_1(X1)),eta)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|capability(X1,X2)!=capability(X1,X3)|position(X1,X2)!=position(X1,X3)|~epred1_3(X3,X2,X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (capability(X1,X2)=capability(X1,X3)|stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2)!=stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)|internal_friction(X1,X2)!=internal_friction(X1,X3)|~epred2_3(X3,X2,X1))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (smaller(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~epred1_3(X3,X2,X1)|~greater(position(X1,X2),position(X1,X3))|~greater_or_equal(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (greater(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))|~epred2_3(X3,X2,X1)|~greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3))|~smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (smaller(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~epred1_3(X3,X2,X1)|~greater(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))|~greater_or_equal(position(X1,X2),position(X1,X3)))).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (smaller(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))|~epred2_3(X3,X2,X1)|~greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3))|~smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)))).
% 8.01/1.44  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 8.01/1.44  # Begin printing tableau
% 8.01/1.44  # Found 11 steps
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk4_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0))|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0))), inference(start_rule)).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_226, plain, (~organization(esk3_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_223, plain, (has_immunity(esk3_0,esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_263, plain, (~has_endowment(esk3_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_264, plain, (~greater(age(esk3_0,esk6_0),eta)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_225, plain, (~has_immunity(esk3_0,esk7_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_286, plain, (~has_endowment(esk3_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk4_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_43, ...])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_45, ...])).
% 8.01/1.44  cnf(i_0_287, plain, (~smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk7_0),eta)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_287, ...])).
% 8.01/1.44  # End printing tableau
% 8.01/1.44  # SZS output end
% 8.01/1.44  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 8.01/1.44  # Child (3448215) has found a proof.
% 8.01/1.44  
% 8.01/1.44  # Proof search is over...
% 8.01/1.44  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------