↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : MGT049+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:07:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 14.05s 3.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (  10 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    ( position(X1,X2) = position(X1,X3)
    | external_ties(X1,X2) != external_ties(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hbd3z3ck/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ( external_ties(X1,X2) = external_ties(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hbd3z3ck/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    organization(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hbd3z3ck/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    position(esk1_0,esk2_0) != position(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hbd3z3ck/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( position(X1,X2) = position(X1,X3)
    | external_ties(X1,X2) != external_ties(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1) ),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( external_ties(X1,X2) = external_ties(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( position(X1,X2) = position(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    organization(esk1_0),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    position(esk1_0,esk2_0) != position(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    position(esk1_0,X1) = position(esk1_0,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT049+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:15:21 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.13/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.13/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.13/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 14.05/3.33  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 14.05/3.33  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 14.05/3.33  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 14.05/3.33  
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof found!
% 14.05/3.33  # SZS status Theorem
% 14.05/3.33  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object total steps             : 11
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object clause steps            : 7
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 14.05/3.33  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 14.05/3.33  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 14.05/3.33  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 14.05/3.33  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Initial clauses                      : 17
% 14.05/3.33  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
% 14.05/3.33  # Processed clauses                    : 26
% 14.05/3.33  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 14.05/3.33  # ...remaining for further processing  : 25
% 14.05/3.33  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 14.05/3.33  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Generated clauses                    : 38
% 14.05/3.33  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 20
% 14.05/3.33  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 14.05/3.33  # Paramodulations                      : 33
% 14.05/3.33  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 14.05/3.33  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 14.05/3.33  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 14.05/3.33  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 14.05/3.33  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 14.05/3.33  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 14.05/3.33  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 14.05/3.33  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 14.05/3.33  # ...number of literals in the above   : 28
% 14.05/3.33  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 14.05/3.33  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 14.05/3.33  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 14.05/3.33  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 14.05/3.33  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 14.05/3.33  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 8
% 14.05/3.33  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 14.05/3.33  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 14.05/3.33  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 14.05/3.33  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 604
% 14.05/3.33  
% 14.05/3.33  # -------------------------------------------------
% 14.05/3.33  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 14.05/3.33  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 14.05/3.33  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 14.05/3.33  # ...preprocessing         : 0.008 s
% 14.05/3.33  # ...main loop             : 0.001 s
% 14.05/3.33  # Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 14.05/3.33  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------