%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : MGT051+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:09:51 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Theorem 4.26s 0.93s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.01 % Problem : MGT051+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.02 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.02/0.29 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % 0.02/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.02/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.02/0.29 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.02/0.29 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.02/0.29 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.02/0.29 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.02/0.29 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 13:18:26 UTC 2026 % 0.02/0.29 % CPUTime : % 0.02/0.31 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.02/0.31 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m % 0.02/0.31 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst. % 0.02/0.31 # % 0.02/0.31 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.02/0.31 # Number of axioms: 40 Number of unprocessed: 40 % 0.02/0.31 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.02/0.31 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.02/0.31 # Hello from C++ % 0.02/0.31 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.02/0.31 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.02/0.31 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.02/0.31 # 40 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.02/0.31 # Creating start rules for all 7 conjectures. % 0.02/0.31 # There are 7 start rule candidates: % 0.02/0.31 # Found 8 unit axioms. % 0.02/0.31 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.02/0.31 # 7 start rule tableaux created. % 0.02/0.31 # 32 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.02/0.31 # 8 unit axiom clauses % 0.02/0.31 % 0.02/0.31 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.02/0.31 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 7 % 0.02/0.31 # Returning from population with 16 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.02/0.31 # We now have 16 tableaux to operate on % 3.47/0.89 # Creating equality axioms % 3.47/0.89 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 4.26/0.93 # There were 5 total branch saturation attempts. % 4.26/0.93 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 4.26/0.93 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 4.26/0.93 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 4.26/0.93 # There were 5 total successful branch saturations. % 4.26/0.93 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 4.26/0.93 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 4.26/0.93 # There were 5 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 4.26/0.93 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.26/0.93 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.26/0.93 # Begin clausification derivation % 4.26/0.93 % 4.26/0.93 # End clausification derivation % 4.26/0.93 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (has_endowment(esk3_0))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (organization(esk3_0))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk5_0),eta))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk3_0,esk6_0),eta))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk4_0),age(esk3_0,esk5_0)))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk3_0,esk7_0),age(esk3_0,esk6_0)))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (organization(X1)|~has_endowment(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk4_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0))|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0)))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (epred2_3(X1,X2,X3)|~organization(X3))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk2_1(X1)),eta)|~has_immunity(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2)=stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (external_ties(X1,X2)=external_ties(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (has_immunity(X1,esk2_1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|~has_immunity(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (epred1_3(X1,X2,X3)|has_immunity(X3,X1)|has_immunity(X3,X2)|~organization(X3))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (position(X1,X2)=position(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (greater(position(X1,X2),position(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(external_ties(X1,X2),external_ties(X1,X3)))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),age(X1,X3)))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (has_immunity(X1,esk2_1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk2_1(X1)),eta)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|capability(X1,X2)!=capability(X1,X3)|position(X1,X2)!=position(X1,X3)|~epred1_3(X3,X2,X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (capability(X1,X2)=capability(X1,X3)|stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2)!=stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)|internal_friction(X1,X2)!=internal_friction(X1,X3)|~epred2_3(X3,X2,X1))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (smaller(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~epred1_3(X3,X2,X1)|~greater(position(X1,X2),position(X1,X3))|~greater_or_equal(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3)))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (greater(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))|~epred2_3(X3,X2,X1)|~greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3))|~smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3)))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (smaller(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~epred1_3(X3,X2,X1)|~greater(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))|~greater_or_equal(position(X1,X2),position(X1,X3)))). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (smaller(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))|~epred2_3(X3,X2,X1)|~greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3))|~smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)))). % 4.26/0.93 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 4.26/0.93 # Begin printing tableau % 4.26/0.93 # Found 11 steps % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk4_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0))|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0))), inference(start_rule)). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_181, plain, (~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk4_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_43, ...])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk7_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_45, ...])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_257, plain, (~smaller(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_182, plain, (~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_23244, plain, (~greater_or_equal(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_23224, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_23224, ...])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_23225, plain, (greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_23225, ...])). % 4.26/0.93 cnf(i_0_23242, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0)=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_23242, ...])). % 4.26/0.93 # End printing tableau % 4.26/0.93 # SZS output end % 4.26/0.93 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 4.26/0.93 # Child (2814297) has found a proof. % 4.26/0.93 % 4.26/0.93 # Proof search is over... % 4.26/0.93 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------