%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem : MGT052+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:35 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 0.53s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT052+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 13:23:41 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.47 start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.53 % Version : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.24/0.53 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.53 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.53 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.24/0.53 fof(background_assumption_1, conjecture, ![X1, X5]:(~(dissimilar(X1,X5,X5))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', background_assumption_1)).
% 0.24/0.53 fof(definition_2, axiom, ![X1, X4, X5]:((dissimilar(X1,X4,X5)<=>(organization(X1)&~((is_aligned(X1,X4)<=>is_aligned(X1,X5)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', definition_2)).
% 0.24/0.53 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1, X5]:(~dissimilar(X1,X5,X5))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[background_assumption_1])])).
% 0.24/0.53 fof(c_0_3, plain, ![X8, X9, X10]:((((organization(X8)|~dissimilar(X8,X9,X10))&((~is_aligned(X8,X9)|~is_aligned(X8,X10)|~dissimilar(X8,X9,X10))&(is_aligned(X8,X9)|is_aligned(X8,X10)|~dissimilar(X8,X9,X10))))&((~is_aligned(X8,X9)|is_aligned(X8,X10)|~organization(X8)|dissimilar(X8,X9,X10))&(~is_aligned(X8,X10)|is_aligned(X8,X9)|~organization(X8)|dissimilar(X8,X9,X10))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[definition_2])])])])).
% 0.24/0.53 fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, dissimilar(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk2_0), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])).
% 0.24/0.53 cnf(c_0_5, plain, (~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 0.24/0.53 cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (dissimilar(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 0.24/0.53 cnf(c_0_7, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X3)|~dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 0.24/0.53 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~is_aligned(esk1_0,esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
% 0.24/0.53 cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_6]), c_0_8]), ['proof']).
% 0.24/0.53 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.24/0.53 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.53 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.53 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.53 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.53 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.53 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.24/0.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------