↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : MGT052+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:17:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.66s 1.54s
% Output   : Proof 8.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT052+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:20:56 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Options -Xverify:none and -noverify were deprecated in JDK 13 and will likely be removed in a future release.
% 0.70/0.70  ________       _____
% 0.70/0.70  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.70/0.70  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.70/0.70  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.70/0.70  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.70/0.70  
% 0.70/0.70  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.70/0.70  (2023-06-19)
% 0.70/0.70  
% 0.70/0.70  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.70/0.70  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.70/0.70                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.70/0.70  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.70/0.70  
% 0.70/0.70  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.70/0.70  
% 0.70/0.71  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.70/0.72  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.70/0.74  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.70/0.74  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.70/0.74  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.70/0.74  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.70/0.74  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.70/0.74  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.70/0.74  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.05/1.11  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.05/1.11  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.15  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.15  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.16  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.16  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.81/1.16  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.85/1.40  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.85/1.45  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 4.85/1.50  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.66/1.50  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.66/1.52  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.66/1.53  Prover 5: proved (798ms)
% 5.66/1.54  
% 5.66/1.54  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.66/1.54  
% 5.66/1.54  Prover 2: stopped
% 5.66/1.54  Prover 3: stopped
% 5.66/1.55  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.66/1.55  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.66/1.55  Prover 6: stopped
% 5.66/1.55  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 5.66/1.55  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 5.66/1.58  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.66/1.58  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.40/1.60  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 6.40/1.60  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 6.40/1.61  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.40/1.64  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.40/1.64  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 6.40/1.66  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.40/1.67  Prover 0: stopped
% 6.40/1.67  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 7.21/1.70  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.21/1.71  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.21/1.72  Prover 4: Found proof (size 19)
% 7.21/1.72  Prover 1: Found proof (size 19)
% 7.21/1.72  Prover 4: proved (986ms)
% 7.21/1.72  Prover 1: proved (987ms)
% 7.21/1.72  Prover 10: stopped
% 7.21/1.72  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.21/1.73  Prover 7: stopped
% 7.21/1.73  Prover 11: stopped
% 7.21/1.74  Prover 13: stopped
% 7.21/1.78  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.21/1.79  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.79/1.80  Prover 8: stopped
% 7.79/1.80  
% 7.79/1.80  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.79/1.80  
% 7.79/1.81  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.79/1.82  Assumptions after simplification:
% 7.79/1.82  ---------------------------------
% 7.79/1.82  
% 7.79/1.82    (background_assumption_1)
% 7.79/1.87     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (dissimilar(v0, v1, v1) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 7.79/1.87  
% 7.79/1.87    (definition_2)
% 7.79/1.88     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 7.79/1.88      (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4:
% 7.79/1.88        any] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] : (organization(v0) = v4 &
% 7.79/1.88        is_aligned(v0, v2) = v6 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (( ~
% 7.79/1.88              (v6 = 0) | v5 = 0) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 7.79/1.88    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 7.79/1.89      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] : (organization(v0) = 0 &
% 7.79/1.89        is_aligned(v0, v2) = v4 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3
% 7.79/1.89            = 0)) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0)))
% 7.79/1.89  
% 7.79/1.89    (function-axioms)
% 8.29/1.90     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 8.29/1.90    [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (dissimilar(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.29/1.90      (dissimilar(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.29/1.90      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 8.29/1.90      (is_aligned(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 8.29/1.90      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 8.29/1.90    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 8.29/1.90      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 8.29/1.90    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v2)
% 8.29/1.90        = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 8.29/1.90      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (smaller(v3,
% 8.29/1.90          v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : 
% 8.29/1.90    ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.29/1.90      (smaller_or_equal(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.29/1.90      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (organization(v2) = v1) | 
% 8.29/1.90      ~ (organization(v2) = v0))
% 8.29/1.90  
% 8.29/1.90  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 8.29/1.90  --------------------------------------------
% 8.29/1.90  definition_greater_or_equal, definition_smaller, definition_smaller_or_equal,
% 8.29/1.90  meaning_postulate_greater_comparable, meaning_postulate_greater_strict,
% 8.29/1.90  meaning_postulate_greater_transitive
% 8.29/1.90  
% 8.29/1.90  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 8.29/1.90  ---------------------------------
% 8.29/1.90  
% 8.29/1.90  Begin of proof
% 8.29/1.90  | 
% 8.29/1.91  | ALPHA: (definition_2) implies:
% 8.29/1.91  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) =
% 8.29/1.91  |            0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4:
% 8.29/1.91  |            any] : (organization(v0) = 0 & is_aligned(v0, v2) = v4 &
% 8.29/1.91  |            is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & (v4 = 0 |
% 8.29/1.91  |              v3 = 0)))
% 8.29/1.91  | 
% 8.29/1.91  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 8.29/1.91  |   (2)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 8.29/1.91  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.29/1.91  |          (is_aligned(v3, v2) = v0))
% 8.29/1.91  | 
% 8.29/1.92  | DELTA: instantiating (background_assumption_1) with fresh symbols all_10_0,
% 8.29/1.92  |        all_10_1 gives:
% 8.29/1.92  |   (3)  dissimilar(all_10_1, all_10_0, all_10_0) = 0 & $i(all_10_0) &
% 8.29/1.92  |        $i(all_10_1)
% 8.29/1.92  | 
% 8.29/1.92  | ALPHA: (3) implies:
% 8.29/1.92  |   (4)  $i(all_10_1)
% 8.29/1.92  |   (5)  $i(all_10_0)
% 8.29/1.92  |   (6)  dissimilar(all_10_1, all_10_0, all_10_0) = 0
% 8.29/1.92  | 
% 8.29/1.92  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_10_1, all_10_0, all_10_0, simplifying
% 8.29/1.92  |              with (4), (5), (6) gives:
% 8.29/1.93  |   (7)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (organization(all_10_1) = 0 &
% 8.29/1.93  |          is_aligned(all_10_1, all_10_0) = v1 & is_aligned(all_10_1, all_10_0)
% 8.29/1.93  |          = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)) & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 8.29/1.93  | 
% 8.29/1.93  | DELTA: instantiating (7) with fresh symbols all_17_0, all_17_1 gives:
% 8.29/1.93  |   (8)  organization(all_10_1) = 0 & is_aligned(all_10_1, all_10_0) = all_17_0
% 8.29/1.93  |        & is_aligned(all_10_1, all_10_0) = all_17_1 & ( ~ (all_17_0 = 0) |  ~
% 8.29/1.93  |          (all_17_1 = 0)) & (all_17_0 = 0 | all_17_1 = 0)
% 8.29/1.93  | 
% 8.29/1.93  | ALPHA: (8) implies:
% 8.29/1.93  |   (9)  is_aligned(all_10_1, all_10_0) = all_17_1
% 8.29/1.93  |   (10)  is_aligned(all_10_1, all_10_0) = all_17_0
% 8.29/1.93  |   (11)  all_17_0 = 0 | all_17_1 = 0
% 8.29/1.93  |   (12)   ~ (all_17_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_17_1 = 0)
% 8.29/1.93  | 
% 8.29/1.93  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_17_1, all_17_0, all_10_0, all_10_1,
% 8.29/1.93  |              simplifying with (9), (10) gives:
% 8.29/1.93  |   (13)  all_17_0 = all_17_1
% 8.29/1.93  | 
% 8.29/1.93  | BETA: splitting (11) gives:
% 8.29/1.93  | 
% 8.29/1.93  | Case 1:
% 8.29/1.93  | | 
% 8.29/1.93  | |   (14)  all_17_0 = 0
% 8.29/1.93  | | 
% 8.29/1.93  | | COMBINE_EQS: (13), (14) imply:
% 8.29/1.93  | |   (15)  all_17_1 = 0
% 8.29/1.93  | | 
% 8.29/1.93  | | BETA: splitting (12) gives:
% 8.29/1.93  | | 
% 8.29/1.93  | | Case 1:
% 8.29/1.93  | | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | |   (16)   ~ (all_17_0 = 0)
% 8.29/1.94  | | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | | REDUCE: (14), (16) imply:
% 8.29/1.94  | | |   (17)  $false
% 8.29/1.94  | | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | | CLOSE: (17) is inconsistent.
% 8.29/1.94  | | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | Case 2:
% 8.29/1.94  | | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | |   (18)   ~ (all_17_1 = 0)
% 8.29/1.94  | | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | | REDUCE: (15), (18) imply:
% 8.29/1.94  | | |   (19)  $false
% 8.29/1.94  | | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | | CLOSE: (19) is inconsistent.
% 8.29/1.94  | | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | End of split
% 8.29/1.94  | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | Case 2:
% 8.29/1.94  | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | |   (20)  all_17_1 = 0
% 8.29/1.94  | |   (21)   ~ (all_17_0 = 0)
% 8.29/1.94  | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | COMBINE_EQS: (13), (20) imply:
% 8.29/1.94  | |   (22)  all_17_0 = 0
% 8.29/1.94  | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | REDUCE: (21), (22) imply:
% 8.29/1.94  | |   (23)  $false
% 8.29/1.94  | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | | CLOSE: (23) is inconsistent.
% 8.29/1.94  | | 
% 8.29/1.94  | End of split
% 8.29/1.94  | 
% 8.29/1.94  End of proof
% 8.29/1.94  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.29/1.94  
% 8.29/1.94  1236ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------