↑ Up

SInE---0.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : MGT052+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 21:08:13 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  32   ~;  29   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn  18   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
    <=> ( organization(X1)
        & ~ ( is_aligned(X1,X2)
          <=> is_aligned(X1,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmprSTyf8/sel_MGT052+1.p_1',definition_2) ).

fof(2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X3] : ~ dissimilar(X1,X3,X3),
    file('/tmp/tmprSTyf8/sel_MGT052+1.p_1',background_assumption_1) ).

fof(3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X3] : ~ dissimilar(X1,X3,X3),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[2]) ).

fof(4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X3] : ~ dissimilar(X1,X3,X3),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[3,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
        | ( organization(X1)
          & ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
            | ~ is_aligned(X1,X3) )
          & ( is_aligned(X1,X2)
            | is_aligned(X1,X3) ) ) )
      & ( ~ organization(X1)
        | ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
            | is_aligned(X1,X3) )
          & ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X3)
            | is_aligned(X1,X2) ) )
        | dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

fof(6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ dissimilar(X4,X5,X6)
        | ( organization(X4)
          & ( ~ is_aligned(X4,X5)
            | ~ is_aligned(X4,X6) )
          & ( is_aligned(X4,X5)
            | is_aligned(X4,X6) ) ) )
      & ( ~ organization(X4)
        | ( ( ~ is_aligned(X4,X5)
            | is_aligned(X4,X6) )
          & ( ~ is_aligned(X4,X6)
            | is_aligned(X4,X5) ) )
        | dissimilar(X4,X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

fof(7,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( organization(X4)
        | ~ dissimilar(X4,X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ is_aligned(X4,X5)
        | ~ is_aligned(X4,X6)
        | ~ dissimilar(X4,X5,X6) )
      & ( is_aligned(X4,X5)
        | is_aligned(X4,X6)
        | ~ dissimilar(X4,X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ is_aligned(X4,X5)
        | is_aligned(X4,X6)
        | ~ organization(X4)
        | dissimilar(X4,X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ is_aligned(X4,X6)
        | is_aligned(X4,X5)
        | ~ organization(X4)
        | dissimilar(X4,X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

cnf(10,plain,
    ( is_aligned(X1,X3)
    | is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    ( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ is_aligned(X1,X3)
    | ~ is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

fof(13,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X3] : dissimilar(X1,X3,X3),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

fof(14,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5] : dissimilar(X4,X5,X5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

fof(15,negated_conjecture,
    dissimilar(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk2_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[14]) ).

cnf(16,negated_conjecture,
    dissimilar(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

cnf(18,negated_conjecture,
    is_aligned(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[10,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_aligned(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[11,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[19,18,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    27,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/MGT/MGT052+1.p
% --creating new selector for [MGT001+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmprSTyf8/sel_MGT052+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem MGT052+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/MGT/MGT052+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/MGT/MGT052+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------