%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MGT053-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:26:55 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 6 unt; 18 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 83 ( 0 equ; 37 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(definition_2_30,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_30) ).
cnf(definition_2_29,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| organization(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_29) ).
cnf(definition_2_34,axiom,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1)
| dissimilar(X1,X3,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_34) ).
cnf(lemma_7_36,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7_36) ).
cnf(definition_2_31,axiom,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X3)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_31) ).
cnf(definition_2_33,axiom,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1)
| dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_33) ).
cnf(lemma_7_39,negated_conjecture,
( ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
| ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7_39) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[definition_2_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| organization(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[definition_2_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1)
| dissimilar(X1,X3,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[definition_2_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3) ),
lemma_7_36 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| organization(X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1)
| dissimilar(X1,X3,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X3) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( is_aligned(sk1,sk3)
| is_aligned(sk1,sk2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
organization(sk1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X3)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[definition_2_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1)
| dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[definition_2_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,X1,sk3)
| is_aligned(sk1,X1)
| is_aligned(sk1,sk2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X3)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ organization(X1)
| dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| is_aligned(X1,X3) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
| is_aligned(sk1,sk2) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
| ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[lemma_7_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ is_aligned(sk1,sk3)
| ~ is_aligned(sk1,sk2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_11]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,sk2,X1)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
| is_aligned(sk1,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,sk3,X1)
| is_aligned(sk1,X1)
| is_aligned(sk1,sk2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
| ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2) ),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)
| is_aligned(sk1,sk2) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
is_aligned(sk1,sk2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ is_aligned(sk1,sk3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_27]),c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,X1,sk2)
| is_aligned(sk1,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_30]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT053-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:26:48 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % sh5l with pid 2155116 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2155123 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 22
% 0.11/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11
% 0.11/0.44 % Initial clauses : 11
% 0.11/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.11/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.11/0.44 % Processed clauses : 25
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.11/0.44 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.11/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.11/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.11/0.44 % Generated clauses : 40
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36
% 0.11/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.11/0.44 % Paramodulations : 35
% 0.11/0.44 % Factorizations : 4
% 0.11/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 32
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of those cached : 29
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.11/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.11/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.11/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.11/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.11/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.11/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.11/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.11/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 871
% 0.11/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 58
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.44 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3896 pages
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.44 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------