↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT054+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.27s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT054+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:24:37 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.27/0.53  
% 0.27/0.53  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.27/0.53  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.27/0.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/0.53  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.27/0.53  SPASS derived 182 clauses, backtracked 8 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 122 clauses.
% 0.27/0.53  SPASS allocated 97767 KBytes.
% 0.27/0.53  SPASS spent	0:00:00.17 on the problem.
% 0.27/0.53  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.27/0.53  		0:00:00.05 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.27/0.53  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.27/0.53  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.27/0.53  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.27/0.53  
% 0.27/0.53  
% 0.27/0.53  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 56 :
% 0.27/0.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.27/0.53  1[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(skc4)*.
% 0.27/0.53  2[0:Inp] || has_endowment(skc4)* -> .
% 0.27/0.53  4[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(skc4,skc7),sigma)*l.
% 0.27/0.53  5[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc5),zero)**.
% 0.27/0.53  6[0:Inp] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma)*.
% 0.27/0.53  7[0:Inp] || dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> organization(u).
% 0.27/0.53  12[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> greater(v,u).
% 0.27/0.53  14[0:Inp] || greater(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc7),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*l -> .
% 0.27/0.53  15[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)*+ greater(v,u)* -> .
% 0.27/0.53  16[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v)* -> has_endowment(u).
% 0.27/0.53  18[0:Inp] || smaller_or_equal(u,v) -> equal(u,v) smaller(u,v)*.
% 0.27/0.53  21[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.27/0.53  22[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero)** -> is_aligned(u,v).
% 0.27/0.53  23[0:Inp] || is_aligned(u,v) is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,w,v)* -> .
% 0.27/0.53  24[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,v,w)*.
% 0.27/0.53  26[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v))*.
% 0.27/0.53  27[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,w) greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))*.
% 0.27/0.53  28[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),sigma) equal(age(u,w),zero) -> dissimilar(u,w,v)*.
% 0.27/0.53  29[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.27/0.53  30[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))* -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v)) has_immunity(u,v).
% 0.27/0.53  31[0:MRR:29.0,7.1] || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.27/0.53  32[0:MRR:30.4,26.1] organization(u) || greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))* -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v)).
% 0.27/0.53  37[0:Res:1.0,24.0] || is_aligned(skc4,u) -> is_aligned(skc4,v) dissimilar(skc4,u,v)*.
% 0.27/0.53  39[0:Res:1.0,22.0] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** -> is_aligned(skc4,u).
% 0.27/0.53  40[0:Res:1.0,16.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u)* -> has_endowment(skc4).
% 0.27/0.53  42[0:Res:6.0,18.0] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma) smaller(age(skc4,skc6),sigma)*.
% 0.27/0.53  43[0:Res:5.0,31.0] || dissimilar(skc4,skc5,u)* -> greater(age(skc4,u),sigma).
% 0.27/0.53  45[0:Res:5.0,22.1] organization(skc4) ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.27/0.53  54[0:Res:4.0,28.2] organization(skc4) || equal(age(skc4,u),zero) -> dissimilar(skc4,u,skc7)*.
% 0.27/0.53  62[0:Res:32.3,14.0] organization(skc4) || greater(capability(skc4,skc6),capability(skc4,skc7))*r -> has_immunity(skc4,skc7).
% 0.27/0.53  68[0:MRR:40.1,2.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u)* -> .
% 0.27/0.53  69[0:MRR:45.0,1.0] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.27/0.53  70[0:MRR:54.0,1.0] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero) -> dissimilar(skc4,u,skc7)*.
% 0.27/0.53  72[0:MRR:62.0,62.2,1.0,68.0] || greater(capability(skc4,skc6),capability(skc4,skc7))*r -> .
% 0.27/0.53  95[0:Res:42.1,12.0] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma) greater(sigma,age(skc4,skc6))*r.
% 0.27/0.53  101[0:Res:70.1,23.2] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** is_aligned(skc4,skc7) is_aligned(skc4,u) -> .
% 0.27/0.53  104[0:MRR:101.2,39.1] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** is_aligned(skc4,skc7) -> .
% 0.27/0.53  109[0:SpL:5.0,104.0] || equal(zero,zero) is_aligned(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 0.27/0.53  110[0:Obv:109.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 0.27/0.53  117[1:Spt:95.0] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma)**.
% 0.27/0.53  134[0:Res:37.2,43.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc5) -> is_aligned(skc4,u) greater(age(skc4,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.27/0.53  137[0:MRR:134.0,69.0] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,u) greater(age(skc4,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.27/0.53  139[1:SpR:117.0,137.1] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)* greater(sigma,sigma).
% 0.27/0.53  151[0:Res:137.1,15.0] || greater(sigma,age(skc4,u))*r -> is_aligned(skc4,u).
% 0.27/0.53  177[1:SpL:117.0,151.0] || greater(sigma,sigma) -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)*.
% 0.27/0.53  178[1:MRR:177.0,139.1] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)*.
% 0.27/0.53  219[0:Res:27.3,72.0] organization(skc4) || is_aligned(skc4,skc6) -> is_aligned(skc4,skc7)*.
% 0.27/0.53  234[0:SSi:219.0,1.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc6) -> is_aligned(skc4,skc7)*.
% 0.27/0.53  235[1:MRR:234.0,234.1,178.0,110.0] ||  -> .
% 0.27/0.53  240[1:Spt:235.0,95.0,117.0] || equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma)** -> .
% 0.27/0.53  241[1:Spt:235.0,95.1] ||  -> greater(sigma,age(skc4,skc6))*r.
% 0.27/0.53  242[0:MRR:234.1,110.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc6)* -> .
% 0.27/0.53  246[1:OCh:21.1,21.0,241.0,137.1] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)* greater(sigma,sigma).
% 0.27/0.53  247[1:NCh:21.2,21.1,241.0,151.0] || greater(sigma,sigma) -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)*.
% 0.27/0.53  254[1:MRR:246.0,242.0] ||  -> greater(sigma,sigma)*.
% 0.27/0.53  255[1:MRR:247.0,247.1,254.0,242.0] ||  -> .
% 0.27/0.53  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.27/0.53  Formulae used in the proof : theorem_5 definition_2 definition_smaller meaning_postulate_greater_strict assumption_1 definition_smaller_or_equal meaning_postulate_greater_transitive assumption_13 assumption_3 assumption_14 assumption_15 assumption_16
% 0.27/0.53  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------