↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT054-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT054-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.09/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:29:47 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS derived 182 clauses, backtracked 8 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 122 clauses.
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS allocated 75795 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 56 :
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.48  1[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v)* -> has_endowment(u).
% 0.20/0.48  2[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.48  3[0:Inp] || dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> organization(u).
% 0.20/0.48  5[0:Inp] || is_aligned(u,v) is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,w,v)* -> .
% 0.20/0.48  7[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,v,w)*.
% 0.20/0.48  10[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero)** -> is_aligned(u,v).
% 0.20/0.48  11[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,w) greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))*.
% 0.20/0.48  12[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),sigma) equal(age(u,w),zero) -> dissimilar(u,w,v)*.
% 0.20/0.48  13[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.20/0.48  14[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))* -> has_immunity(u,w) has_immunity(u,v) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v)).
% 0.20/0.48  15[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(sk1)*.
% 0.20/0.48  16[0:Inp] || has_endowment(sk1)* -> .
% 0.20/0.48  17[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(age(sk1,sk2),zero)**.
% 0.20/0.48  18[0:Inp] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(age(sk1,sk3),sigma)*.
% 0.20/0.48  19[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(sk1,sk4),sigma)*l.
% 0.20/0.48  21[0:Inp] || greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk4),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3))*l -> .
% 0.20/0.48  22[0:Inp] || smaller_or_equal(u,v) -> equal(u,v) smaller(u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.48  28[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> greater(v,u).
% 0.20/0.48  30[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)*+ greater(v,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.48  31[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.20/0.48  33[0:MRR:13.0,3.1] || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.20/0.48  34[0:MRR:14.3,2.1] organization(u) || greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))* -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v)).
% 0.20/0.48  39[0:Res:15.0,7.0] || is_aligned(sk1,u) -> is_aligned(sk1,v) dissimilar(sk1,u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.48  41[0:Res:15.0,10.0] || equal(age(sk1,u),zero)** -> is_aligned(sk1,u).
% 0.20/0.48  42[0:Res:15.0,1.0] || has_immunity(sk1,u)* -> has_endowment(sk1).
% 0.20/0.48  44[0:Res:18.0,22.0] ||  -> equal(age(sk1,sk3),sigma) smaller(age(sk1,sk3),sigma)*.
% 0.20/0.48  45[0:Res:17.0,33.0] || dissimilar(sk1,sk2,u)* -> greater(age(sk1,u),sigma).
% 0.20/0.48  47[0:Res:17.0,10.1] organization(sk1) ||  -> is_aligned(sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.20/0.48  56[0:Res:19.0,12.2] organization(sk1) || equal(age(sk1,u),zero) -> dissimilar(sk1,u,sk4)*.
% 0.20/0.48  64[0:Res:34.3,21.0] organization(sk1) || greater(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk4))*r -> has_immunity(sk1,sk4).
% 0.20/0.48  70[0:MRR:42.1,16.0] || has_immunity(sk1,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.48  71[0:MRR:47.0,15.0] ||  -> is_aligned(sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.20/0.48  72[0:MRR:56.0,15.0] || equal(age(sk1,u),zero) -> dissimilar(sk1,u,sk4)*.
% 0.20/0.48  74[0:MRR:64.0,64.2,15.0,70.0] || greater(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk4))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.48  97[0:Res:44.1,28.0] ||  -> equal(age(sk1,sk3),sigma) greater(sigma,age(sk1,sk3))*r.
% 0.20/0.48  103[0:Res:72.1,5.2] || equal(age(sk1,u),zero)** is_aligned(sk1,sk4) is_aligned(sk1,u) -> .
% 0.20/0.48  106[0:MRR:103.2,41.1] || equal(age(sk1,u),zero)** is_aligned(sk1,sk4) -> .
% 0.20/0.48  111[0:SpL:17.0,106.0] || equal(zero,zero) is_aligned(sk1,sk4)* -> .
% 0.20/0.48  112[0:Obv:111.0] || is_aligned(sk1,sk4)* -> .
% 0.20/0.48  119[1:Spt:97.0] ||  -> equal(age(sk1,sk3),sigma)**.
% 0.20/0.48  136[0:Res:39.2,45.0] || is_aligned(sk1,sk2) -> is_aligned(sk1,u) greater(age(sk1,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.20/0.48  139[0:MRR:136.0,71.0] ||  -> is_aligned(sk1,u) greater(age(sk1,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.20/0.48  141[1:SpR:119.0,139.1] ||  -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3)* greater(sigma,sigma).
% 0.20/0.48  153[0:Res:139.1,30.0] || greater(sigma,age(sk1,u))*r -> is_aligned(sk1,u).
% 0.20/0.48  179[1:SpL:119.0,153.0] || greater(sigma,sigma) -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3)*.
% 0.20/0.48  180[1:MRR:179.0,141.1] ||  -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3)*.
% 0.20/0.48  221[0:Res:11.3,74.0] organization(sk1) || is_aligned(sk1,sk3) -> is_aligned(sk1,sk4)*.
% 0.20/0.48  236[0:SSi:221.0,15.0] || is_aligned(sk1,sk3) -> is_aligned(sk1,sk4)*.
% 0.20/0.48  237[1:MRR:236.0,236.1,180.0,112.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.48  242[1:Spt:237.0,97.0,119.0] || equal(age(sk1,sk3),sigma)** -> .
% 0.20/0.48  243[1:Spt:237.0,97.1] ||  -> greater(sigma,age(sk1,sk3))*r.
% 0.20/0.48  244[0:MRR:236.1,112.0] || is_aligned(sk1,sk3)* -> .
% 0.20/0.48  248[1:OCh:31.1,31.0,243.0,139.1] ||  -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3)* greater(sigma,sigma).
% 0.20/0.48  249[1:NCh:31.2,31.1,243.0,153.0] || greater(sigma,sigma) -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3)*.
% 0.20/0.48  256[1:MRR:248.0,244.0] ||  -> greater(sigma,sigma)*.
% 0.20/0.48  257[1:MRR:249.0,249.1,256.0,244.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : assumption_1_38 assumption_3_39 definition_2_40 definition_2_42 definition_2_44 assumption_13_47 assumption_14_48 assumption_15_49 assumption_15_50 assumption_16_51 theorem_5_52 theorem_5_53 theorem_5_54 theorem_5_55 theorem_5_56 theorem_5_58 definition_smaller_or_equal_1 definition_smaller_7 meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9 meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10
% 0.20/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------