↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : MGT055+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:00:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.09s 2.87s
% Output   : Refutation 5.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  161 (  20 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  538 (  18   ~;  10   |;  73   &; 391   @)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  39  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (  10 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   17 (  15 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   0   ^;  86   !;   0   ?;  86   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(organization_decl,type,
    organization: $i > $o ).

thf(has_endowment_decl,type,
    has_endowment: $i > $o ).

thf(age_decl,type,
    age: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(zero_decl,type,
    zero: $i ).

thf(smaller_or_equal_decl,type,
    smaller_or_equal: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(eta_decl,type,
    eta: $i ).

thf(greater_decl,type,
    greater: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sigma_decl,type,
    sigma: $i ).

thf(hazard_of_mortality_decl,type,
    hazard_of_mortality: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(smaller_decl,type,
    smaller: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(greater_or_equal_decl,type,
    greater_or_equal: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(has_immunity_decl,type,
    has_immunity: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(dissimilar_decl,type,
    dissimilar: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(is_aligned_decl,type,
    is_aligned: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(capability_decl,type,
    capability: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ capability ) @ ( C @ ( A @ capability ) @ greater ) )
        & ~ ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ~ ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_16) ).

thf(110,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ capability ) @ ( C @ ( A @ capability ) @ greater ) )
        & ~ ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ~ ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( A @ ( B @ greater ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',meaning_postulate_greater_strict) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( A @ ( B @ greater ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ greater_or_equal ) )
    <=> ( ( A = B )
        | ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_greater_or_equal) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ greater_or_equal ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ greater_or_equal ) )
       => ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
      ( ( ( zero @ ( eta @ greater ) )
        & ( eta @ ( sigma @ greater ) )
        & ( sigma @ ( E @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
        & ( sigma @ ( D @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
        & ( eta @ ( D @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
        & ( eta @ ( C @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
        & ( ( B @ ( A @ age ) )
          = zero )
        & ( A @ has_endowment )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( ( ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
          = ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) ) )
        & ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( D @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( E @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_8) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
        ( ( ( zero @ ( eta @ greater ) )
          & ( eta @ ( sigma @ greater ) )
          & ( sigma @ ( E @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
          & ( sigma @ ( D @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
          & ( eta @ ( D @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
          & ( eta @ ( C @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
          & ( ( B @ ( A @ age ) )
            = zero )
          & ( A @ has_endowment )
          & ( A @ organization ) )
       => ( ( ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
            = ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) ) )
          & ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( D @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) )
          & ( D @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( E @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
        ( ( ( zero @ ( eta @ greater ) )
          & ( eta @ ( sigma @ greater ) )
          & ( sigma @ ( E @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
          & ( sigma @ ( D @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
          & ( eta @ ( D @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
          & ( eta @ ( C @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
          & ( ( B @ ( A @ age ) )
            = zero )
          & ( A @ has_endowment )
          & ( A @ organization ) )
       => ( ( ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
            = ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) ) )
          & ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( D @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) )
          & ( D @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( E @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
        = ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_2) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
        = ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ smaller_or_equal ) )
    <=> ( ( A = B )
        | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_smaller_or_equal) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ smaller_or_equal ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ smaller_or_equal ) )
       => ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) )
    <=> ( A @ ( B @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_smaller) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ greater ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ greater ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ greater ) )
      | ( A = B )
      | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',meaning_postulate_greater_comparable) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ greater ) )
      | ( A = B )
      | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ greater ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',meaning_postulate_greater_transitive) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ greater ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ dissimilar ) ) )
    <=> ( ~ ( ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
          <=> ( C @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).

thf(85,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( ( ( C @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
               => ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
              & ( ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
               => ( C @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) ) )
          & ( A @ organization ) )
       => ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ dissimilar ) ) ) )
      & ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ dissimilar ) ) )
       => ( ~ ( ( ( C @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
               => ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
              & ( ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
               => ( C @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) ) )
          & ( A @ organization ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ age ) )
          = zero )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( ( sigma @ ( C @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
      <=> ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ dissimilar ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_15) ).

thf(102,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ age ) )
          = zero )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ dissimilar ) ) )
         => ( sigma @ ( C @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) ) )
        & ( ( sigma @ ( C @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
         => ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ dissimilar ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ has_endowment )
    <=> ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( ( eta @ ( B @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
           => ~ ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) ) )
          & ( ( eta @ ( B @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
           => ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) ) )
          & ( A @ organization ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_1) ).

thf(65,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( ( eta @ ( B @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
             => ~ ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) ) )
            & ( ( eta @ ( B @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
             => ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) ) )
            & ( A @ organization ) )
       => ( A @ has_endowment ) )
      & ( ( A @ has_endowment )
       => ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( ( eta @ ( B @ ( A @ age ) @ greater ) )
             => ~ ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) ) )
            & ( ( eta @ ( B @ ( A @ age ) @ smaller_or_equal ) )
             => ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) ) )
            & ( A @ organization ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ age ) )
          = zero )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_13) ).

thf(97,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ age ) )
          = zero )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_3) ).

thf(83,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( C @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ capability ) @ ( B @ ( A @ capability ) @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_14) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( C @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ capability ) @ ( B @ ( A @ capability ) @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(229,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[110,57,41,17,80,31,51,62,60,85,102,65,97,83,100]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT055+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.12/0.39  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:09:47 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.83/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.23/1.16  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (194ms). 
% 1.23/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.86/1.57  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.86/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.07/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 14 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.26/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 14 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.26/1.77  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.26/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.26/1.78  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.09/2.87  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.09/2.87  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.09/2.87  % Time passed: 2333ms (effective reasoning time: 1685ms)
% 5.09/2.87  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.09/2.87  % Axioms used in derivation (14): assumption_16, assumption_3, definition_smaller, assumption_15, meaning_postulate_greater_comparable, meaning_postulate_greater_transitive, assumption_2, definition_2, meaning_postulate_greater_strict, definition_greater_or_equal, definition_1, assumption_13, definition_smaller_or_equal, assumption_14
% 5.09/2.87  % No. of inferences in proof: 32
% 5.09/2.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2333 ms resp. 1685 ms w/o parsing
% 5.88/2.93  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.88/2.93  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------