%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : MGT055-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:09:51 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Unsatisfiable 18.36s 2.73s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT055-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.03 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 13:28:57 UTC 2026 % 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m % 0.13/0.38 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst. % 0.13/0.38 # % 0.13/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 39 Number of unprocessed: 39 % 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.38 # 39 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 10 conjectures. % 0.13/0.38 # There are 10 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.38 # Found 11 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.38 # 10 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.38 # 28 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.38 # 11 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 18.36/2.73 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 18.36/2.73 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 18.36/2.73 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 18.36/2.73 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 18.36/2.73 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 18.36/2.73 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 18.36/2.73 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 18.36/2.73 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 18.36/2.73 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 18.36/2.73 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 18.36/2.73 # Begin clausification derivation % 18.36/2.73 % 18.36/2.73 # End clausification derivation % 18.36/2.73 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (has_endowment(sk2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_75, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (age(sk2,sk3)=zero)). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_83, negated_conjecture, (greater(eta,zero))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_82, negated_conjecture, (greater(sigma,eta))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(sk2,sk4),eta))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_80, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(sk2,sk5),sigma))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_79, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(sk2,sk5),eta))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_81, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(sk2,sk6),sigma))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (organization(X1)|~has_endowment(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (organization(X1)|~dissimilar(X1,X2,X3))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_84, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4)|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4))|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk6),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5)))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~dissimilar(X1,X3,X2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|age(X1,X2)!=zero|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X3)|~dissimilar(X1,X2,X3))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|dissimilar(X1,X3,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (greater(age(X1,X2),sigma)|age(X1,X3)!=zero|~dissimilar(X1,X3,X2))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|~has_immunity(X1,sk1(X1))|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)|age(X1,X2)!=zero|~organization(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X3),sigma))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (has_immunity(X1,sk1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|greater(capability(X1,X3),capability(X1,X2))|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(capability(X1,X3),capability(X1,X2)))). % 18.36/2.73 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 18.36/2.73 # Begin printing tableau % 18.36/2.73 # Found 4 steps % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_83, negated_conjecture, (greater(eta,zero)), inference(start_rule)). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (greater(eta,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_51])). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_102, plain, (~greater(zero,eta)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_49])). % 18.36/2.73 cnf(i_0_110, plain, (~smaller(eta,zero)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_110, ...])). % 18.36/2.73 # End printing tableau % 18.36/2.73 # SZS output end % 18.36/2.73 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 18.36/2.73 # Child (2590590) has found a proof. % 18.36/2.73 % 18.36/2.73 # Proof search is over... % 18.36/2.73 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------