↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : MGT056+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:01:23 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 21.66s 3.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 21.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : MGT056+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:13:42 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.66/3.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 21.66/3.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 21.66/3.29  fof(definition_1, axiom, ! [X0] : (('has$uendowment'(X0) <=> ! [X1] : ((organization(X0) & (('smaller$uor$uequal'(age(X0,X1),eta) => 'has$uimmunity'(X0,X1)) & (greater(age(X0,X1),eta) => ~'has$uimmunity'(X0,X1)))))))).
% 21.66/3.29  fof(assumption_2, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : (((organization(X0) & ('has$uimmunity'(X0,X1) & 'has$uimmunity'(X0,X2))) => 'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X1) = 'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X2)))).
% 21.66/3.29  fof(assumption_3, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : (((organization(X0) & ('has$uimmunity'(X0,X1) & ~'has$uimmunity'(X0,X2))) => greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X2),'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X1))))).
% 21.66/3.29  fof(definition_smaller_or_equal, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : (('smaller$uor$uequal'(X0,X1) <=> (smaller(X0,X1) | X0 = X1)))).
% 21.66/3.29  fof(definition_greater_or_equal, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : (('greater$uor$uequal'(X0,X1) <=> (greater(X0,X1) | X0 = X1)))).
% 21.66/3.29  fof(definition_smaller, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((smaller(X0,X1) <=> greater(X1,X0)))).
% 21.66/3.29  fof(meaning_postulate_greater_transitive, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : (((greater(X0,X1) & greater(X1,X2)) => greater(X0,X2)))).
% 21.66/3.29  fof(lemma_9, conjecture, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ! [X3] : (((organization(X0) & ('has$uendowment'(X0) & (age(X0,X1) = zero & ('smaller$uor$uequal'(age(X0,X2),eta) & (greater(age(X0,X3),eta) & ('greater$uor$uequal'(eta,sigma) & greater(sigma,zero))))))) => (greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X3),'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X2)) & 'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X2) = 'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X1))))).
% 21.66/3.29  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ! [X1] : ! [X2] : ! [X3] : (((organization(X0) & ('has$uendowment'(X0) & (age(X0,X1) = zero & ('smaller$uor$uequal'(age(X0,X2),eta) & (greater(age(X0,X3),eta) & ('greater$uor$uequal'(eta,sigma) & greater(sigma,zero))))))) => (greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X3),'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X2)) & 'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X2) = 'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X1)))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [lemma_9])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c0, plain, ~'has$uendowment'(X0) | X1(X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [definition_1])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c3, plain, ~X0(X1) | ~'smaller$uor$uequal'(age(X1,X2),eta) | 'has$uimmunity'(X1,X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [definition_1])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c4, plain, ~X0(X1) | ~greater(age(X1,X2),eta) | ~'has$uimmunity'(X1,X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [definition_1])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c9, plain, ~organization(X0) | ~'has$uimmunity'(X0,X1) | ~'has$uimmunity'(X0,X2) | 'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X1) = 'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [assumption_2])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c10, plain, ~organization(X0) | ~'has$uimmunity'(X0,X1) | 'has$uimmunity'(X0,X2) | greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X2),'hazard$uof$umortality'(X0,X1)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [assumption_3])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c12, plain, 'smaller$uor$uequal'(X0,X1) | ~smaller(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [definition_smaller_or_equal])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c14, plain, ~'greater$uor$uequal'(X0,X1) | greater(X0,X1) | X0 = X1, inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [definition_greater_or_equal])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c18, plain, smaller(X0,X1) | ~greater(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [definition_smaller])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c20, plain, ~greater(X0,X1) | ~greater(X1,X2) | greater(X0,X2), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [meaning_postulate_greater_transitive])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c22, plain, organization(sK23), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c23, plain, 'has$uendowment'(sK23), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c24, plain, age(sK23,sK24) = zero, inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c25, plain, 'smaller$uor$uequal'(age(sK23,sK25),eta), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c26, plain, greater(age(sK23,sK26),eta), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c27, plain, 'greater$uor$uequal'(eta,sigma), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c28, plain, greater(sigma,zero), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(c29, plain, ~greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK26),'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25)) | 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25) != 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK24), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d0, plain, ~'Ts0'(sK23) | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK25), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c25,c3])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d1, plain, 'Ts0'(sK23), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c23,c0])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d2, plain, 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK25), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d1,d0])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d3, plain, 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25) = 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,X0) | ~organization(sK23) | ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d2,c9])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d4, plain, 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25) = 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,X0) | ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c22,d3])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d5, plain, ~'smaller$uor$uequal'(zero,eta) | ~'Ts0'(sK23) | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK24), inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [c24,c3])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d6, plain, ~'smaller$uor$uequal'(zero,eta) | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK24), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d1,d5])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d7, plain, eta = sigma | greater(eta,sigma), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c14,c27])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d8, plain, greater(X0,zero) | ~greater(X0,sigma), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c20,c28])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d9, plain, greater(eta,zero) | eta = sigma, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d8,d7])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d10, plain, eta = sigma | smaller(zero,eta), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d9,c18])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d11, plain, eta = sigma | 'smaller$uor$uequal'(zero,eta), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d10,c12])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d12, plain, eta = sigma | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK24), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d11,d6])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d13, plain, eta = sigma | 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25) = 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK24), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d12,d4])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d14, plain, greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,X0),'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25)) | ~organization(sK23) | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,X0) | ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK24) | eta = sigma, inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [d13,c10])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d15, plain, eta = sigma | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,X0) | ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK24) | greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,X0),'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c22,d14])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d16, plain, 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25) != 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25) | ~greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK26),'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25)) | eta = sigma, inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [d13,c29])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d17, plain, eta = sigma | ~greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK26),'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25)), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [d16])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d18, plain, eta = sigma | eta = sigma | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK26) | ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK24), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d17,d15])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d19, plain, ~'Ts0'(sK23) | ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK26), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c26,c4])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d20, plain, ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK26), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d1,d19])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d21, plain, eta = sigma | ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK24), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d20,d18])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d22, plain, eta = sigma | eta = sigma, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d21,d12])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d23, plain, smaller(zero,sigma), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c18,c28])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d24, plain, 'smaller$uor$uequal'(zero,sigma), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d23,c12])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d25, plain, 'smaller$uor$uequal'(zero,eta), inference(demodulation, [status(thm)], [d24,d22])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d26, plain, 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK24), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d25,d6])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d27, plain, 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25) = 'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK24), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d26,d4])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d28, plain, ~greater('hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK26),'hazard$uof$umortality'(sK23,sK25)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d27,c29])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d29, plain, ~organization(sK23) | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK26) | ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK25), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d28,c10])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d30, plain, ~'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK25) | 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK26), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c22,d29])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d31, plain, 'has$uimmunity'(sK23,sK26), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d2,d30])).
% 21.66/3.29  cnf(d32, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d20,d31])).
% 21.66/3.29  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------