↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT056-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.05s 1.24s
% Output   : Refutation 1.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : MGT056-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 11:31:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Thu Jun  9 11:31:51 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 26824.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [copy,31,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  31 back subsumes 21.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.19/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 30
% 0.19/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.19/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 88
% 0.19/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 18
% 0.19/0.39     distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.19/0.39     distinct function count: 3
% 0.19/0.39     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.05/1.24  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.05/1.24  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Model 4 [ 1 1 311 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Model 6 [ 1 0 264 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.85 sec ----> 2885 [binary,2884.1,2858.1] {-} $F.
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Length of proof is 16.  Level of proof is 7.
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.05/1.24  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.05/1.24  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  2 [] {+} -smaller(A,B)|smaller_or_equal(A,B).
% 1.05/1.24  3 [] {+} A!=B|smaller_or_equal(A,B).
% 1.05/1.24  4 [] {+} -greater_or_equal(A,B)|greater(A,B)|A=B.
% 1.05/1.24  9 [] {+} -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 1.05/1.24  10 [] {+} -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,C)|greater(A,C).
% 1.05/1.24  12 [] {+} -has_endowment(A)| -smaller_or_equal(age(A,B),eta)|has_immunity(A,B).
% 1.05/1.24  13 [] {+} -has_endowment(A)| -greater(age(A,B),eta)| -has_immunity(A,B).
% 1.05/1.24  17 [] {+} -organization(A)| -has_immunity(A,B)| -has_immunity(A,C)|hazard_of_mortality(A,B)=hazard_of_mortality(A,C).
% 1.05/1.24  18 [] {+} -organization(A)| -has_immunity(A,B)|has_immunity(A,C)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(A,C),hazard_of_mortality(A,B)).
% 1.05/1.24  19 [] {+} -greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4))|hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3).
% 1.05/1.24  20 [factor,9.1.2] {+} -greater(A,A).
% 1.05/1.24  22 [] {+} smaller(A,B)|A=B|greater(A,B).
% 1.05/1.24  23 [] {+} organization(sk2).
% 1.05/1.24  24 [] {+} has_endowment(sk2).
% 1.05/1.24  25 [] {+} age(sk2,sk3)=zero.
% 1.05/1.24  27 [] {+} smaller_or_equal(age(sk2,sk4),eta).
% 1.05/1.24  28 [] {+} greater(age(sk2,sk5),eta).
% 1.05/1.24  29 [] {+} greater_or_equal(eta,sigma).
% 1.05/1.24  30 [] {+} greater(sigma,zero).
% 1.05/1.24  31 [] {+} A=A.
% 1.05/1.24  33 [hyper,22,2] {+} A=B|greater(A,B)|smaller_or_equal(A,B).
% 1.05/1.24  77 [hyper,29,4,flip.2] {+} greater(eta,sigma)|sigma=eta.
% 1.05/1.24  99 [para_from,25.1.1,12.2.1,unit_del,24] {-} -smaller_or_equal(zero,eta)|has_immunity(sk2,sk3).
% 1.05/1.24  120 [hyper,31,3] {+} smaller_or_equal(A,A).
% 1.05/1.24  136 [hyper,27,12,24] {+} has_immunity(sk2,sk4).
% 1.05/1.24  501 [hyper,33,99] {-} zero=eta|greater(zero,eta)|has_immunity(sk2,sk3).
% 1.05/1.24  816 [hyper,136,18,23] {+} has_immunity(sk2,A)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,A),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4)).
% 1.05/1.24  1530 [hyper,77,10,30] {+} sigma=eta|greater(eta,zero).
% 1.05/1.24  1615 [para_from,501.1.1,99.1.1,unit_del,120,factor_simp] {-} has_immunity(sk2,sk3)|greater(zero,eta).
% 1.05/1.24  1674 [hyper,1615,17,23,136] {-} greater(zero,eta)|hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4)=hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3).
% 1.05/1.24  2116 [para_from,1530.1.1,30.1.1,factor_simp] {+} greater(eta,zero).
% 1.05/1.24  2333,2332 [hyper,1674,10,2116,unit_del,20] {-} hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4)=hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3).
% 1.05/1.24  2762 [back_demod,816,demod,2333] {-} has_immunity(sk2,A)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,A),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)).
% 1.05/1.24  2858 [back_demod,19,demod,2333,2333,unit_del,31] {+} -greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)).
% 1.05/1.24  2884 [hyper,2762,13,24,28] {-} greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)).
% 1.05/1.24  2885 [binary,2884.1,2858.1] {-} $F.
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.05/1.24  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  ============ end of search ============
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  true clauses given          31      (38.8%)
% 1.05/1.24  false clauses given         49
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.05/1.24     3  0         1
% 1.05/1.24     5  0         1
% 1.05/1.24     6  0         9
% 1.05/1.24     7  0         1
% 1.05/1.24     8  0         11
% 1.05/1.24     9  0         114
% 1.05/1.24    10  2         3
% 1.05/1.24    11  28        55
% 1.05/1.24    12  32        75
% 1.05/1.24    13  17        39
% 1.05/1.24    14  3         0
% 1.05/1.24    15  0         595
% 1.05/1.24    16  2         20
% 1.05/1.24    17  45        12
% 1.05/1.24    18  1         12
% 1.05/1.24    19  16        102
% 1.05/1.24    20  0         30
% 1.05/1.24    21  0         114
% 1.05/1.24    22  0         25
% 1.05/1.24    23  0         78
% 1.05/1.24    25  0         18
% 1.05/1.24    26  0         178
% 1.05/1.24    28  0         215
% 1.05/1.24    29  0         26
% 1.05/1.24    30  0         59
% 1.05/1.24    31  0         15
% 1.05/1.24    32  0         3
% 1.05/1.24  tot:  146       1811      (92.5% true)
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  Process 26824 finished Thu Jun  9 11:31:52 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------