%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : MGT057+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n031.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:09:52 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.39s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT057+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.03 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.10/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.10/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.10/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 13:32:41 UTC 2026 % 0.10/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m % 0.12/0.38 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst. % 0.12/0.38 # % 0.12/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.38 # Number of axioms: 27 Number of unprocessed: 27 % 0.12/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.38 # 27 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 7 conjectures. % 0.12/0.38 # There are 7 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.38 # Found 8 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.12/0.38 # 7 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.38 # 19 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.38 # 8 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 7 % 0.12/0.38 # Returning from population with 15 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.38 # We now have 15 tableaux to operate on % 0.12/0.39 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.39 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.39 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.39 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.39 % 0.12/0.39 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (has_endowment(esk3_0))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (organization(esk3_0))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (age(esk3_0,esk4_0)=zero)). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (greater(eta,zero))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk5_0),eta))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk3_0,esk6_0),eta))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (organization(X1)|~has_endowment(X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk4_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk2_1(X1)),eta)|~has_immunity(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (has_immunity(X1,esk2_1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|~has_immunity(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk2_1(X1)),eta)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (has_immunity(X1,esk2_1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.39 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.39 # Found 4 steps % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk3_0,esk6_0),eta)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (greater(age(esk3_0,esk6_0),eta)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_153, plain, (~greater(eta,age(esk3_0,esk6_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_159, plain, (~smaller(age(esk3_0,esk6_0),eta)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_159, ...])). % 0.12/0.39 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.39 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.40 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.40 % 0.12/0.40 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (has_endowment(esk3_0))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (organization(esk3_0))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (age(esk3_0,esk4_0)=zero)). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (greater(eta,zero))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk5_0),eta))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk3_0,esk6_0),eta))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (organization(X1)|~has_endowment(X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk4_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk6_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk2_1(X1)),eta)|~has_immunity(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (has_immunity(X1,esk2_1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|~has_immunity(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk2_1(X1)),eta)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (has_immunity(X1,esk2_1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 0.12/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.40 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.40 # Found 7 steps % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk5_0),eta)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk3_0,esk5_0),eta)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_172, plain, (~has_endowment(esk3_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_171, plain, (has_immunity(esk3_0,esk5_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_219, plain, (~has_immunity(esk3_0,esk5_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_171])). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_220, plain, (~organization(esk3_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])). % 0.12/0.40 cnf(i_0_217, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)=hazard_of_mortality(esk3_0,esk5_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_217, ...])). % 0.12/0.40 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.40 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.40 # Child (4128948) has found a proof. % 0.12/0.40 % 0.12/0.40 # Proof search is over... % 0.12/0.40 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------