%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : MGT057+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:17:27 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Theorem 10.04s 2.14s % Output : Proof 14.68s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT057+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 13:29:45 UTC 2026 % 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.09/0.38 OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Options -Xverify:none and -noverify were deprecated in JDK 13 and will likely be removed in a future release. % 0.72/0.70 ________ _____ % 0.72/0.70 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.72/0.70 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.72/0.70 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.72/0.70 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.72/0.70 % 0.72/0.70 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.72/0.70 (2023-06-19) % 0.72/0.70 % 0.72/0.70 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.72/0.70 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.72/0.70 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.72/0.70 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.72/0.70 % 0.72/0.70 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.72/0.70 % 0.72/0.70 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.72/0.72 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.72/0.74 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.72/0.74 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.72/0.74 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.72/0.74 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.72/0.74 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.72/0.74 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.72/0.74 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.85/1.17 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.85/1.17 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 3.35/1.23 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 3.35/1.23 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.35/1.24 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 3.35/1.24 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 3.35/1.24 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 5.68/1.60 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.52/1.62 Prover 5: Proving ... % 6.52/1.64 Prover 2: Proving ... % 6.52/1.65 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.52/1.66 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.52/1.69 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.25/1.71 Prover 6: Proving ... % 8.04/1.80 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.04/1.84 Prover 0: Proving ... % 10.04/2.14 Prover 3: proved (1404ms) % 10.04/2.14 % 10.04/2.14 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 10.04/2.14 % 10.04/2.14 Prover 0: stopped % 10.04/2.14 Prover 6: stopped % 10.04/2.15 Prover 2: stopped % 10.04/2.16 Prover 5: stopped % 10.85/2.16 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 10.85/2.16 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 10.85/2.16 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 10.85/2.16 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 10.85/2.16 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 11.19/2.21 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 11.19/2.24 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 11.19/2.24 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 11.19/2.25 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 11.19/2.25 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 11.19/2.29 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 11.95/2.30 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.95/2.33 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 11.95/2.34 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 12.75/2.40 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 12.75/2.42 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 12.75/2.44 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 12.75/2.46 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 13.53/2.55 Prover 7: Found proof (size 23) % 13.53/2.55 Prover 7: proved (409ms) % 13.53/2.55 Prover 8: stopped % 13.53/2.56 Prover 4: stopped % 13.53/2.56 Prover 10: stopped % 13.53/2.56 Prover 1: stopped % 13.53/2.56 Prover 13: stopped % 13.53/2.59 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.20/2.61 Prover 11: stopped % 14.20/2.61 % 14.20/2.61 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 14.20/2.61 % 14.20/2.62 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 14.20/2.63 Assumptions after simplification: % 14.20/2.63 --------------------------------- % 14.20/2.63 % 14.20/2.63 (assumption_2) % 14.20/2.68 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v4 = v3 % 14.20/2.68 | ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v4) | ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = % 14.20/2.68 v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_immunity(v0, v2) | ~ % 14.20/2.68 has_immunity(v0, v1) | ~ organization(v0)) % 14.20/2.68 % 14.20/2.68 (assumption_3) % 14.20/2.69 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ % 14.20/2.69 (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v4) | % 14.20/2.69 ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_immunity(v0, v1) | ~ % 14.20/2.69 organization(v0) | has_immunity(v0, v2) | greater(v3, v4)) % 14.20/2.69 % 14.20/2.69 (definition_1) % 14.20/2.70 $i(eta) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) | % 14.20/2.70 ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_immunity(v0, v1) | ~ has_endowment(v0) | ~ % 14.20/2.70 greater(v2, eta)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (age(v0, % 14.20/2.70 v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_endowment(v0) | ~ % 14.20/2.70 smaller_or_equal(v2, eta) | has_immunity(v0, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) % 14.20/2.70 | ~ has_endowment(v0) | organization(v0)) & ? [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | % 14.20/2.70 has_endowment(v0) | ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v1) & ( ~ % 14.20/2.70 organization(v0) | (age(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2) & has_immunity(v0, v1) & % 14.20/2.70 greater(v2, eta)) | (age(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2) & smaller_or_equal(v2, % 14.20/2.70 eta) & ~ has_immunity(v0, v1))))) % 14.20/2.70 % 14.20/2.70 (definition_smaller) % 14.68/2.70 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v1, v0) | % 14.68/2.70 smaller(v0, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 14.68/2.70 smaller(v0, v1) | greater(v1, v0)) % 14.68/2.70 % 14.68/2.70 (definition_smaller_or_equal) % 14.68/2.70 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 14.68/2.70 smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) | smaller(v0, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( % 14.68/2.70 ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ smaller(v0, v1) | smaller_or_equal(v0, v1)) & ? % 14.68/2.70 [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | smaller_or_equal(v0, v0)) % 14.68/2.70 % 14.68/2.70 (theorem_6) % 14.68/2.71 $i(zero) & $i(eta) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : % 14.68/2.71 ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: $i] : ? [v6: $i] : ? [v7: $i] : ? [v8: $i] : % 14.68/2.71 (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v7 & age(v0, v3) = v5 & age(v0, v2) = v4 & % 14.68/2.71 age(v0, v1) = zero & $i(v7) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & % 14.68/2.71 $i(v0) & organization(v0) & has_endowment(v0) & greater(v5, eta) & % 14.68/2.71 greater(eta, zero) & smaller_or_equal(v4, eta) & (( ~ (v8 = v7) & % 14.68/2.71 hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v8 & $i(v8)) | (hazard_of_mortality(v0, % 14.68/2.71 v3) = v6 & $i(v6) & ~ greater(v6, v7)))) % 14.68/2.71 % 14.68/2.71 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 14.68/2.71 -------------------------------------------- % 14.68/2.71 definition_greater_or_equal, meaning_postulate_greater_comparable, % 14.68/2.71 meaning_postulate_greater_strict, meaning_postulate_greater_transitive % 14.68/2.71 % 14.68/2.71 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 14.68/2.71 --------------------------------- % 14.68/2.71 % 14.68/2.71 Begin of proof % 14.68/2.71 | % 14.68/2.71 | ALPHA: (definition_smaller_or_equal) implies: % 14.68/2.71 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ smaller(v0, v1) % 14.68/2.71 | | smaller_or_equal(v0, v1)) % 14.68/2.71 | % 14.68/2.71 | ALPHA: (definition_smaller) implies: % 14.68/2.72 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v1, v0) % 14.68/2.72 | | smaller(v0, v1)) % 14.68/2.72 | % 14.68/2.72 | ALPHA: (definition_1) implies: % 14.68/2.72 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ % 14.68/2.72 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_endowment(v0) | ~ smaller_or_equal(v2, % 14.68/2.72 | eta) | has_immunity(v0, v1)) % 14.68/2.72 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ % 14.68/2.72 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_immunity(v0, v1) | ~ has_endowment(v0) | % 14.68/2.72 | ~ greater(v2, eta)) % 14.68/2.72 | % 14.68/2.72 | ALPHA: (theorem_6) implies: % 14.68/2.72 | (5) $i(eta) % 14.68/2.72 | (6) $i(zero) % 14.68/2.72 | (7) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : % 14.68/2.72 | ? [v5: $i] : ? [v6: $i] : ? [v7: $i] : ? [v8: $i] : % 14.68/2.72 | (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v7 & age(v0, v3) = v5 & age(v0, v2) = v4 % 14.68/2.72 | & age(v0, v1) = zero & $i(v7) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & % 14.68/2.72 | $i(v1) & $i(v0) & organization(v0) & has_endowment(v0) & greater(v5, % 14.68/2.73 | eta) & greater(eta, zero) & smaller_or_equal(v4, eta) & (( ~ (v8 = % 14.68/2.73 | v7) & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v8 & $i(v8)) | % 14.68/2.73 | (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v3) = v6 & $i(v6) & ~ greater(v6, v7)))) % 14.68/2.73 | % 14.68/2.73 | DELTA: instantiating (7) with fresh symbols all_16_0, all_16_1, all_16_2, % 14.68/2.73 | all_16_3, all_16_4, all_16_5, all_16_6, all_16_7, all_16_8 gives: % 14.68/2.73 | (8) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_6) = all_16_1 & age(all_16_8, % 14.68/2.73 | all_16_5) = all_16_3 & age(all_16_8, all_16_6) = all_16_4 & % 14.68/2.73 | age(all_16_8, all_16_7) = zero & $i(all_16_1) & $i(all_16_3) & % 14.68/2.73 | $i(all_16_4) & $i(all_16_5) & $i(all_16_6) & $i(all_16_7) & % 14.68/2.73 | $i(all_16_8) & organization(all_16_8) & has_endowment(all_16_8) & % 14.68/2.73 | greater(all_16_3, eta) & greater(eta, zero) & % 14.68/2.73 | smaller_or_equal(all_16_4, eta) & (( ~ (all_16_0 = all_16_1) & % 14.68/2.73 | hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_7) = all_16_0 & $i(all_16_0)) % 14.68/2.73 | | (hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_5) = all_16_2 & $i(all_16_2) % 14.68/2.73 | & ~ greater(all_16_2, all_16_1))) % 14.68/2.73 | % 14.68/2.73 | ALPHA: (8) implies: % 14.68/2.73 | (9) smaller_or_equal(all_16_4, eta) % 14.68/2.73 | (10) greater(eta, zero) % 14.68/2.73 | (11) greater(all_16_3, eta) % 14.68/2.73 | (12) has_endowment(all_16_8) % 14.68/2.73 | (13) organization(all_16_8) % 14.68/2.73 | (14) $i(all_16_8) % 14.68/2.73 | (15) $i(all_16_7) % 14.68/2.73 | (16) $i(all_16_6) % 14.68/2.73 | (17) $i(all_16_5) % 14.68/2.73 | (18) age(all_16_8, all_16_7) = zero % 14.68/2.73 | (19) age(all_16_8, all_16_6) = all_16_4 % 14.68/2.73 | (20) age(all_16_8, all_16_5) = all_16_3 % 14.68/2.73 | (21) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_6) = all_16_1 % 14.68/2.74 | (22) ( ~ (all_16_0 = all_16_1) & hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_7) = % 14.68/2.74 | all_16_0 & $i(all_16_0)) | (hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_5) % 14.68/2.74 | = all_16_2 & $i(all_16_2) & ~ greater(all_16_2, all_16_1)) % 14.68/2.74 | % 14.68/2.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with zero, eta, simplifying with (5), (6), (10) % 14.68/2.74 | gives: % 14.68/2.74 | (23) smaller(zero, eta) % 14.68/2.74 | % 14.68/2.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_16_8, all_16_7, zero, simplifying with % 14.68/2.74 | (12), (14), (15), (18) gives: % 14.68/2.74 | (24) ~ smaller_or_equal(zero, eta) | has_immunity(all_16_8, all_16_7) % 14.68/2.74 | % 14.68/2.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_16_8, all_16_6, all_16_4, simplifying % 14.68/2.74 | with (9), (12), (14), (16), (19) gives: % 14.68/2.74 | (25) has_immunity(all_16_8, all_16_6) % 14.68/2.74 | % 14.68/2.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with zero, eta, simplifying with (5), (6), (23) % 14.68/2.74 | gives: % 14.68/2.74 | (26) smaller_or_equal(zero, eta) % 14.68/2.74 | % 14.68/2.74 | BETA: splitting (24) gives: % 14.68/2.74 | % 14.68/2.74 | Case 1: % 14.68/2.74 | | % 14.68/2.74 | | (27) ~ smaller_or_equal(zero, eta) % 14.68/2.74 | | % 14.68/2.74 | | PRED_UNIFY: (26), (27) imply: % 14.68/2.74 | | (28) $false % 14.68/2.74 | | % 14.68/2.74 | | CLOSE: (28) is inconsistent. % 14.68/2.74 | | % 14.68/2.74 | Case 2: % 14.68/2.74 | | % 14.68/2.75 | | (29) has_immunity(all_16_8, all_16_7) % 14.68/2.75 | | % 14.68/2.75 | | BETA: splitting (22) gives: % 14.68/2.75 | | % 14.68/2.75 | | Case 1: % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.75 | | | (30) ~ (all_16_0 = all_16_1) & hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_7) % 14.68/2.75 | | | = all_16_0 & $i(all_16_0) % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.75 | | | ALPHA: (30) implies: % 14.68/2.75 | | | (31) ~ (all_16_0 = all_16_1) % 14.68/2.75 | | | (32) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_7) = all_16_0 % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.75 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (assumption_2) with all_16_8, all_16_7, % 14.68/2.75 | | | all_16_6, all_16_0, all_16_1, simplifying with (13), (14), % 14.68/2.75 | | | (15), (16), (21), (25), (29), (32) gives: % 14.68/2.75 | | | (33) all_16_0 = all_16_1 % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.75 | | | REDUCE: (31), (33) imply: % 14.68/2.75 | | | (34) $false % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.75 | | | CLOSE: (34) is inconsistent. % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.75 | | Case 2: % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.75 | | | (35) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_5) = all_16_2 & $i(all_16_2) % 14.68/2.75 | | | & ~ greater(all_16_2, all_16_1) % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.75 | | | ALPHA: (35) implies: % 14.68/2.75 | | | (36) ~ greater(all_16_2, all_16_1) % 14.68/2.75 | | | (37) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_5) = all_16_2 % 14.68/2.75 | | | % 14.68/2.76 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (assumption_3) with all_16_8, all_16_6, % 14.68/2.76 | | | all_16_5, all_16_2, all_16_1, simplifying with (13), (14), % 14.68/2.76 | | | (16), (17), (21), (25), (36), (37) gives: % 14.68/2.76 | | | (38) has_immunity(all_16_8, all_16_5) % 14.68/2.76 | | | % 14.68/2.76 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_16_8, all_16_5, all_16_3, % 14.68/2.76 | | | simplifying with (11), (12), (14), (17), (20), (38) gives: % 14.68/2.76 | | | (39) $false % 14.68/2.76 | | | % 14.68/2.76 | | | CLOSE: (39) is inconsistent. % 14.68/2.76 | | | % 14.68/2.76 | | End of split % 14.68/2.76 | | % 14.68/2.76 | End of split % 14.68/2.76 | % 14.68/2.76 End of proof % 14.68/2.76 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 14.68/2.76 % 14.68/2.76 2056ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------