↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT057-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT057-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:30:30 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m
% 0.08/0.37  # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 0.08/0.37  #
% 0.08/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.08/0.37  # Number of axioms: 26 Number of unprocessed: 26
% 0.08/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.08/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.08/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.38  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.38  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.38  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.38  # 26 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.38  # Creating start rules for all 7 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.38  # There are 7 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.38  # Found 8 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.38  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.38  # 7 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.38  # 18 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.38  # 8 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.38  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 7
% 0.13/0.38  # Returning from population with 15 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.38  # We now have 15 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (has_endowment(sk2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (age(sk2,sk3)=zero)).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (greater(eta,zero))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(sk2,sk4),eta))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(sk2,sk5),eta))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (organization(X1)|~has_endowment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4)|~greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4)))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),eta))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),eta))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|~has_immunity(X1,sk1(X1))|~organization(X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|greater(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (has_immunity(X1,sk1(X1))|has_endowment(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|greater(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3))|~has_immunity(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.38  # Found 4 steps
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (greater(eta,zero)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (greater(eta,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_36])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_172, plain, (~greater(zero,eta)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_178, plain, (~smaller(eta,zero)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_178, ...])).
% 0.13/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.38  # Child (1724513) has found a proof.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------