↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : MGT058+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:26:57 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  166 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  168 (  53   ~;  65   |;  33   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn  38   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(lemma_10,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( greater_or_equal(tau,zero)
        & greater_or_equal(sigma,zero)
        & ? [X5] : age(X1,X5) = zero
        & organization(X1) )
     => ~ ( robust_position(X1)
          & fragile_position(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_10) ).

fof(definition_4,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( robust_position(X1)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( ( greater(age(X1,X4),tau)
           => positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
          & ( smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X4),tau)
           => ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_4) ).

fof(definition_3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( fragile_position(X1)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( ( greater(age(X1,X4),sigma)
           => ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
          & ( smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X4),sigma)
           => positional_advantage(X1,X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_3) ).

fof(definition_greater_or_equal,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
    <=> ( X1 = X2
        | greater(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001+0.ax',definition_greater_or_equal) ).

fof(definition_smaller_or_equal,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    <=> ( X1 = X2
        | smaller(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001+0.ax',definition_smaller_or_equal) ).

fof(definition_smaller,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( smaller(X1,X2)
    <=> greater(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001+0.ax',definition_smaller) ).

fof(meaning_postulate_greater_comparable,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( greater(X1,X2)
      | X1 = X2
      | smaller(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001+0.ax',meaning_postulate_greater_comparable) ).

fof(meaning_postulate_greater_strict,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( greater(X2,X1)
        & greater(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001+0.ax',meaning_postulate_greater_strict) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( greater_or_equal(tau,zero)
          & greater_or_equal(sigma,zero)
          & ? [X5] : age(X1,X5) = zero
          & organization(X1) )
       => ~ ( robust_position(X1)
            & fragile_position(X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[lemma_10]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( robust_position(X1)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( ( greater(age(X1,X4),tau)
           => positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
          & ( smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X4),tau)
           => ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[definition_4]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( fragile_position(X1)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( ( greater(age(X1,X4),sigma)
           => ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
          & ( smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X4),sigma)
           => positional_advantage(X1,X4) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[definition_3]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] :
      ( ( greater_or_equal(X20,X21)
        | X20 != X21 )
      & ( greater_or_equal(X20,X21)
        | ~ greater(X20,X21) )
      & ( X20 = X21
        | greater(X20,X21)
        | ~ greater_or_equal(X20,X21) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[definition_greater_or_equal])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( robust_position(esk1_0)
    & fragile_position(esk1_0)
    & greater_or_equal(tau,zero)
    & greater_or_equal(sigma,zero)
    & age(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
    & organization(esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( robust_position(X11)
        | positional_advantage(X11,esk3_1(X11))
        | ~ positional_advantage(X11,esk4_1(X11)) )
      & ( robust_position(X11)
        | positional_advantage(X11,esk3_1(X11))
        | greater(age(X11,esk4_1(X11)),tau) )
      & ( robust_position(X11)
        | smaller_or_equal(age(X11,esk3_1(X11)),tau)
        | ~ positional_advantage(X11,esk4_1(X11)) )
      & ( robust_position(X11)
        | smaller_or_equal(age(X11,esk3_1(X11)),tau)
        | greater(age(X11,esk4_1(X11)),tau) )
      & ( ~ robust_position(X8)
        | positional_advantage(X8,X10)
        | ~ greater(age(X8,X10),tau) )
      & ( ~ robust_position(X8)
        | ~ positional_advantage(X8,X9)
        | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X8,X9),tau) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( ( smaller_or_equal(X27,X28)
        | X27 != X28 )
      & ( smaller_or_equal(X27,X28)
        | ~ smaller(X27,X28) )
      & ( X27 = X28
        | smaller(X27,X28)
        | ~ smaller_or_equal(X27,X28) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_or_equal])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X29,X30] :
      ( ( smaller(X29,X30)
        | ~ greater(X30,X29) )
      & ( greater(X30,X29)
        | ~ smaller(X29,X30) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[definition_smaller])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16,X17] :
      ( ( fragile_position(X17)
        | ~ positional_advantage(X17,esk5_1(X17))
        | positional_advantage(X17,esk6_1(X17)) )
      & ( fragile_position(X17)
        | ~ positional_advantage(X17,esk5_1(X17))
        | greater(age(X17,esk6_1(X17)),sigma) )
      & ( fragile_position(X17)
        | smaller_or_equal(age(X17,esk5_1(X17)),sigma)
        | positional_advantage(X17,esk6_1(X17)) )
      & ( fragile_position(X17)
        | smaller_or_equal(age(X17,esk5_1(X17)),sigma)
        | greater(age(X17,esk6_1(X17)),sigma) )
      & ( ~ fragile_position(X14)
        | ~ positional_advantage(X14,X16)
        | ~ greater(age(X14,X16),sigma) )
      & ( ~ fragile_position(X14)
        | positional_advantage(X14,X15)
        | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X14,X15),sigma) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X31,X32] :
      ( greater(X31,X32)
      | X31 = X32
      | smaller(X31,X32) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_comparable]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ~ greater(X23,X22)
      | ~ greater(X22,X23) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_strict])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(sigma,zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ robust_position(X1)
    | ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),tau) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    age(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    robust_position(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ smaller(X1,X2)
    | smaller_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X1,X2)
    | smaller(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ fragile_position(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),sigma)
    | positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    fragile_position(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( greater(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2
    | smaller(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(sigma,zero)
    | zero = sigma ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ smaller_or_equal(zero,tau)
    | ~ positional_advantage(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | smaller_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma)
    | positional_advantage(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_22]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(zero,sigma)
    | zero = sigma ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(tau,zero)
    | ~ positional_advantage(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( positional_advantage(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | zero = sigma ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(tau,zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(tau,zero)
    | zero = sigma ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(tau,zero)
    | zero = tau ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | smaller_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | zero = tau ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    smaller_or_equal(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    zero = sigma,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    age(esk1_0,esk2_0) = sigma,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    positional_advantage(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_44]),c_0_43])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ smaller_or_equal(sigma,tau),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_45]),c_0_23]),c_0_46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(tau,sigma),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    tau = sigma,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_44]),c_0_44]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_49]),c_0_43])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT058+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.31  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:23:38 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.31  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.35  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.35  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.35  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % new_bool_3 with pid 1301890 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.07/0.35  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.35  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.35  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.35  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.35  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1301895 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.07/0.35  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.35  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.35  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.35  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.35  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.35  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.35  
% 0.07/0.35  % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.35  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.35  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.07/0.35  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Initial clauses                      : 29
% 0.07/0.35  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
% 0.07/0.35  % Processed clauses                    : 89
% 0.07/0.35  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % ...subsumed                          : 21
% 0.07/0.35  % ...remaining for further processing  : 68
% 0.07/0.35  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.07/0.35  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.07/0.35  % Backward-rewritten                   : 35
% 0.07/0.35  % Generated clauses                    : 119
% 0.07/0.35  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 115
% 0.07/0.35  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.07/0.35  % Paramodulations                      : 114
% 0.07/0.35  % Factorizations                       : 3
% 0.07/0.35  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.07/0.35  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Total rewrite steps                  : 66
% 0.07/0.35  % ...of those cached                   : 57
% 0.07/0.35  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.07/0.35  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.07/0.35  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.35  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.07/0.35  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.35  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.07/0.35  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35  % Current number of processed clauses  : 30
% 0.07/0.35  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.07/0.35  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.35  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.07/0.35  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 20
% 0.07/0.35  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 51
% 0.07/0.35  % ...number of literals in the above   : 172
% 0.07/0.35  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Current number of archived clauses   : 36
% 0.07/0.35  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 315
% 0.07/0.35  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 290
% 0.07/0.35  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 16
% 0.07/0.35  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42
% 0.07/0.35  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.07/0.35  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.07/0.35  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.07/0.35  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2790
% 0.07/0.35  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 422
% 0.07/0.35  
% 0.07/0.35  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.35  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.35  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.35  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.07/0.35  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.07/0.35  
% 0.07/0.35  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.35  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.07/0.35  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.07/0.35  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.07/0.35  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.07/0.35  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------