↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : MGT058+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:08:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 18.95s 4.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 18.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  16 unt;   9 nHn;  46 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   94 (  25 equ;  41 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(tau,zero),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ robust_position(X1)
    | ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),tau) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    age(esk5_0,esk6_0) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    robust_position(esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_19,plain,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ smaller(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(i_0_27,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | smaller(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_28) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ fragile_position(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),sigma) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    fragile_position(esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    ( smaller(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(sigma,zero),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_24) ).

cnf(i_0_18,plain,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-iyyfalgz/input.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(tau,zero),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ robust_position(X1)
    | ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),tau) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    age(esk5_0,esk6_0) = zero,
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    robust_position(esk5_0),
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ smaller(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | smaller(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = tau
    | greater(tau,zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ fragile_position(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),sigma) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    fragile_position(esk5_0),
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( smaller(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ positional_advantage(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(zero,tau) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | smaller_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( zero = tau
    | ~ greater(zero,tau) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( positional_advantage(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_45]),c_0_52])]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( zero = tau
    | ~ positional_advantage(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( positional_advantage(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ greater(sigma,zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(sigma,zero),
    i_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( zero = tau
    | ~ greater(sigma,zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | greater(sigma,zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | zero = tau ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    smaller_or_equal(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_64]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( zero = sigma
    | ~ greater(zero,sigma) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( zero = sigma
    | ~ positional_advantage(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_65]),c_0_66])]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    zero = sigma,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_55]),c_0_67]),c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | tau != sigma ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( ~ positional_advantage(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ greater(tau,zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    positional_advantage(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_69]),c_0_66])]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( tau != sigma
    | ~ positional_advantage(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(sigma,tau) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
    ( tau = sigma
    | greater(tau,sigma) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_69]),c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ~ greater(tau,sigma),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_69]),c_0_72])]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( tau != sigma
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(sigma,tau) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_72])]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    tau = sigma,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]),c_0_77]),c_0_66])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : MGT058+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.16/0.44  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:31:32 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.27/0.59  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.27/0.59  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.27/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.27/0.59  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 18.95/4.94  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 18.95/4.94  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 18.95/4.94  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 18.95/4.94  
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof found!
% 18.95/4.94  # SZS status Theorem
% 18.95/4.94  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object total steps             : 50
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object clause steps            : 37
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object conjectures             : 20
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 15
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 5
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 13
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 13
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object generating inferences   : 17
% 18.95/4.94  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 25
% 18.95/4.94  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 18.95/4.94  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 18.95/4.94  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 18.95/4.94  # Initial clauses                      : 29
% 18.95/4.94  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 18.95/4.94  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
% 18.95/4.95  # Processed clauses                    : 114
% 18.95/4.95  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 18.95/4.95  # ...subsumed                          : 19
% 18.95/4.95  # ...remaining for further processing  : 94
% 18.95/4.95  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 18.95/4.95  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 18.95/4.95  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 18.95/4.95  # Backward-rewritten                   : 50
% 18.95/4.95  # Generated clauses                    : 208
% 18.95/4.95  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 185
% 18.95/4.95  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 10
% 18.95/4.95  # Paramodulations                      : 200
% 18.95/4.95  # Factorizations                       : 5
% 18.95/4.95  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 18.95/4.95  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 18.95/4.95  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 18.95/4.95  # Current number of processed clauses  : 35
% 18.95/4.95  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 18.95/4.95  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 18.95/4.95  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 18.95/4.95  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 25
% 18.95/4.95  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
% 18.95/4.95  # ...number of literals in the above   : 54
% 18.95/4.95  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 18.95/4.95  # Current number of archived clauses   : 57
% 18.95/4.95  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 890
% 18.95/4.95  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 577
% 18.95/4.95  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 31
% 18.95/4.95  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% 18.95/4.95  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 18.95/4.95  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 18.95/4.95  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 18.95/4.95  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 18.95/4.95  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 18.95/4.95  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2784
% 18.95/4.95  
% 18.95/4.95  # -------------------------------------------------
% 18.95/4.95  # User time                : 0.035 s
% 18.95/4.95  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 18.95/4.95  # Total time               : 0.040 s
% 18.95/4.95  # ...preprocessing         : 0.027 s
% 18.95/4.95  # ...main loop             : 0.013 s
% 18.95/4.95  # Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 18.95/4.95  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------