↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT058+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT058+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.07/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:31:15 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.52  
% 0.23/0.52  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.23/0.52  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.23/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.52  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.23/0.52  SPASS derived 63 clauses, backtracked 17 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 87 clauses.
% 0.23/0.52  SPASS allocated 97834 KBytes.
% 0.23/0.52  SPASS spent	0:00:00.16 on the problem.
% 0.23/0.52  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.23/0.52  		0:00:00.05 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.23/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.23/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.23/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.23/0.52  
% 0.23/0.52  
% 0.23/0.52  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 54 :
% 0.23/0.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.23/0.52  2[0:Inp] ||  -> fragile_position(skc2)*.
% 0.23/0.52  3[0:Inp] ||  -> robust_position(skc2)*.
% 0.23/0.52  4[0:Inp] ||  -> greater_or_equal(tau,zero)*.
% 0.23/0.52  5[0:Inp] ||  -> greater_or_equal(sigma,zero)*.
% 0.23/0.52  6[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(age(skc2,skc3),zero)**.
% 0.23/0.52  7[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> smaller_or_equal(u,v).
% 0.23/0.52  8[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) -> smaller_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 0.23/0.52  12[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> smaller(v,u)*.
% 0.23/0.52  16[0:Inp] || greater_or_equal(u,v)* -> equal(u,v) greater(u,v).
% 0.23/0.52  20[0:Inp] fragile_position(u) || smaller_or_equal(age(u,v),sigma)* -> positional_advantage(u,v).
% 0.23/0.52  26[0:Inp] robust_position(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) smaller_or_equal(age(u,v),tau)* -> .
% 0.23/0.52  31[0:Res:3.0,26.0] || positional_advantage(skc2,u) smaller_or_equal(age(skc2,u),tau)* -> .
% 0.23/0.52  33[0:Res:2.0,20.0] || smaller_or_equal(age(skc2,u),sigma)* -> positional_advantage(skc2,u).
% 0.23/0.52  34[0:Res:5.0,16.0] ||  -> equal(zero,sigma) greater(sigma,zero)*r.
% 0.23/0.52  35[0:Res:4.0,16.0] ||  -> equal(zero,tau) greater(tau,zero)*r.
% 0.23/0.52  36[0:Res:6.0,8.0] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(age(skc2,skc3),zero)*.
% 0.23/0.52  40[0:Rew:6.0,36.0] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(zero,zero)*.
% 0.23/0.52  44[1:Spt:35.0] ||  -> equal(zero,tau)**.
% 0.23/0.52  46[1:Rew:44.0,40.0] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(tau,tau)*.
% 0.23/0.52  49[1:Rew:44.0,6.0] ||  -> equal(age(skc2,skc3),tau)**.
% 0.23/0.52  50[1:Rew:44.0,34.0] ||  -> equal(tau,sigma) greater(sigma,zero)*r.
% 0.23/0.52  51[1:Rew:44.0,50.1] ||  -> equal(tau,sigma) greater(sigma,tau)*r.
% 0.23/0.52  54[1:SpL:49.0,33.0] || smaller_or_equal(tau,sigma) -> positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)*.
% 0.23/0.52  55[0:Res:8.1,33.0] || equal(age(skc2,u),sigma)** -> positional_advantage(skc2,u).
% 0.23/0.52  56[1:SpL:49.0,55.0] || equal(tau,sigma) -> positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)*.
% 0.23/0.52  58[1:SpL:49.0,31.1] || positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)* smaller_or_equal(tau,tau) -> .
% 0.23/0.52  60[1:MRR:58.1,46.0] || positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)* -> .
% 0.23/0.52  61[1:MRR:54.1,60.0] || smaller_or_equal(tau,sigma)* -> .
% 0.23/0.52  62[1:MRR:56.1,60.0] || equal(tau,sigma)** -> .
% 0.23/0.52  63[1:MRR:51.0,62.0] ||  -> greater(sigma,tau)*r.
% 0.23/0.52  67[0:Res:12.1,7.0] || greater(u,v) -> smaller_or_equal(v,u)*.
% 0.23/0.52  72[1:Res:67.1,61.0] || greater(sigma,tau)*r -> .
% 0.23/0.52  73[1:MRR:72.0,63.0] ||  -> .
% 0.23/0.52  74[1:Spt:73.0,35.0,44.0] || equal(zero,tau)** -> .
% 0.23/0.52  75[1:Spt:73.0,35.1] ||  -> greater(tau,zero)*r.
% 0.23/0.52  76[2:Spt:34.0] ||  -> equal(zero,sigma)**.
% 0.23/0.52  77[2:Rew:76.0,75.0] ||  -> greater(tau,sigma)*l.
% 0.23/0.52  80[2:Rew:76.0,40.0] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(sigma,sigma)*.
% 0.23/0.52  83[2:Rew:76.0,6.0] ||  -> equal(age(skc2,skc3),sigma)**.
% 0.23/0.52  86[2:SpL:83.0,33.0] || smaller_or_equal(sigma,sigma) -> positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)*.
% 0.23/0.52  88[2:SpL:83.0,31.1] || positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)* smaller_or_equal(sigma,tau) -> .
% 0.23/0.52  90[2:MRR:86.0,80.0] ||  -> positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)*.
% 0.23/0.52  92[2:MRR:88.0,90.0] || smaller_or_equal(sigma,tau)* -> .
% 0.23/0.52  94[2:Res:67.1,92.0] || greater(tau,sigma)*l -> .
% 0.23/0.52  95[2:MRR:94.0,77.0] ||  -> .
% 0.23/0.52  96[2:Spt:95.0,34.0,76.0] || equal(zero,sigma)** -> .
% 0.23/0.52  97[2:Spt:95.0,34.1] ||  -> greater(sigma,zero)*r.
% 0.23/0.52  99[0:SpL:6.0,33.0] || smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma) -> positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)*.
% 0.23/0.52  101[0:SpL:6.0,31.1] || positional_advantage(skc2,skc3)* smaller_or_equal(zero,tau) -> .
% 0.23/0.52  103[0:Res:99.1,101.0] || smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma) smaller_or_equal(zero,tau)* -> .
% 0.23/0.52  106[0:Res:67.1,103.1] || greater(tau,zero) smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma)* -> .
% 0.23/0.52  107[1:MRR:106.0,75.0] || smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma)* -> .
% 0.23/0.52  109[1:Res:67.1,107.0] || greater(sigma,zero)*r -> .
% 0.23/0.52  110[2:MRR:109.0,97.0] ||  -> .
% 0.23/0.52  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.23/0.52  Formulae used in the proof : lemma_10 definition_smaller_or_equal definition_smaller definition_greater_or_equal definition_3 definition_4
% 0.23/0.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------