↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : MGT059+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:48:22 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   66 (  19   ~;   6   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(assumption_17,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( organization(X1)
     => ( ( has_immunity(X1,X4)
         => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = very_low )
        & ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X4)
         => ( ( ( is_aligned(X1,X4)
                & positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
             => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = low )
            & ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X4)
                & positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
             => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod1 )
            & ( ( is_aligned(X1,X4)
                & ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
             => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod2 )
            & ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X4)
                & ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
             => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = high ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17) ).

fof(assumption_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X5,X4] :
      ( ( organization(X1)
        & has_immunity(X1,X5)
        & has_immunity(X1,X4) )
     => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X5) = hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_2) ).

fof(c_0_2,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( epred1_2(X4,X1)
    <=> ( ( ( is_aligned(X1,X4)
            & positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
         => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = low )
        & ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X4)
            & positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
         => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod1 )
        & ( ( is_aligned(X1,X4)
            & ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
         => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod2 )
        & ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X4)
            & ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
         => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = high ) ) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( organization(X1)
     => ( ( has_immunity(X1,X4)
         => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = very_low )
        & ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X4)
         => epred1_2(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17]),c_0_2]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X5,X4] :
        ( ( organization(X1)
          & has_immunity(X1,X5)
          & has_immunity(X1,X4) )
       => hazard_of_mortality(X1,X5) = hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[assumption_2]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X37,X38] :
      ( ( ~ has_immunity(X37,X38)
        | hazard_of_mortality(X37,X38) = very_low
        | ~ organization(X37) )
      & ( has_immunity(X37,X38)
        | epred1_2(X38,X37)
        | ~ organization(X37) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( organization(esk1_0)
    & has_immunity(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & has_immunity(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) != hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low
    | ~ has_immunity(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    has_immunity(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    organization(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) != hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0) = very_low,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    has_immunity(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) != very_low,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]),c_0_9])]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : MGT059+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 23:33:38 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.71  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------