↑ Up

CSI_E---1.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem  : MGT059+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:04:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.54s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : MGT059+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  7 13:32:56 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.24/0.47  start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.54  % Version  : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.24/0.54  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.54  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.54  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.24/0.54  fof(assumption_17, axiom, ![X1, X4]:((organization(X1)=>((has_immunity(X1,X4)=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=very_low)&(~(has_immunity(X1,X4))=>(((((is_aligned(X1,X4)&positional_advantage(X1,X4))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=low)&((~(is_aligned(X1,X4))&positional_advantage(X1,X4))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=mod1))&((is_aligned(X1,X4)&~(positional_advantage(X1,X4)))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=mod2))&((~(is_aligned(X1,X4))&~(positional_advantage(X1,X4)))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=high)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', assumption_17)).
% 0.24/0.54  fof(assumption_2, conjecture, ![X1, X5, X4]:((((organization(X1)&has_immunity(X1,X5))&has_immunity(X1,X4))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X5)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', assumption_2)).
% 0.24/0.54  fof(c_0_2, plain, ![X1, X4]:((epred1_2(X4,X1)<=>(((((is_aligned(X1,X4)&positional_advantage(X1,X4))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=low)&((~is_aligned(X1,X4)&positional_advantage(X1,X4))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=mod1))&((is_aligned(X1,X4)&~positional_advantage(X1,X4))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=mod2))&((~is_aligned(X1,X4)&~positional_advantage(X1,X4))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=high)))), introduced(definition)).
% 0.24/0.54  fof(c_0_3, plain, ![X1, X4]:((organization(X1)=>((has_immunity(X1,X4)=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)=very_low)&(~has_immunity(X1,X4)=>epred1_2(X4,X1))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17]), c_0_2])).
% 0.24/0.54  fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1, X5, X4]:((((organization(X1)&has_immunity(X1,X5))&has_immunity(X1,X4))=>hazard_of_mortality(X1,X5)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[assumption_2])).
% 0.24/0.54  fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X9, X10]:(((~has_immunity(X9,X10)|hazard_of_mortality(X9,X10)=very_low|~organization(X9))&(has_immunity(X9,X10)|epred1_2(X10,X9)|~organization(X9)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])).
% 0.24/0.54  fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (((organization(esk1_0)&has_immunity(esk1_0,esk2_0))&has_immunity(esk1_0,esk3_0))&hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])).
% 0.24/0.54  cnf(c_0_7, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=very_low|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
% 0.24/0.54  cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (has_immunity(esk1_0,esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 0.24/0.54  cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (organization(esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 0.24/0.54  cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (has_immunity(esk1_0,esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 0.24/0.54  cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 0.24/0.54  cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0)=very_low), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_9])])).
% 0.24/0.54  cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0)=very_low), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_10]), c_0_9])])).
% 0.24/0.54  cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13])]), ['proof']).
% 0.24/0.54  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.24/0.54  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.54  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.54  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.54  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.54  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.54  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.24/0.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------