%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:28:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 62 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 65 ( 18 ~; 6 |; 24 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(assumption_17,axiom,
! [X1,X4] :
( organization(X1)
=> ( ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X4)
=> ( ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4)
& ~ is_aligned(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = high )
& ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4)
& is_aligned(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod2 )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X1,X4)
& ~ is_aligned(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod1 )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X1,X4)
& is_aligned(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = low ) ) )
& ( has_immunity(X1,X4)
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = very_low ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17) ).
fof(assumption_2,conjecture,
! [X1,X5,X4] :
( ( has_immunity(X1,X4)
& has_immunity(X1,X5)
& organization(X1) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X5) = hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_2) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X1,X4] :
( epred1_2(X4,X1)
<=> ( ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4)
& ~ is_aligned(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = high )
& ( ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4)
& is_aligned(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod2 )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X1,X4)
& ~ is_aligned(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod1 )
& ( ( positional_advantage(X1,X4)
& is_aligned(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = low ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X1,X4] :
( organization(X1)
=> ( ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X4)
=> epred1_2(X4,X1) )
& ( has_immunity(X1,X4)
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = very_low ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17]),c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X5,X4] :
( ( has_immunity(X1,X4)
& has_immunity(X1,X5)
& organization(X1) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X5) = hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[assumption_2]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X9,X10] :
( ( ~ organization(X9)
| epred1_2(X10,X9)
| has_immunity(X9,X10) )
& ( ~ organization(X9)
| hazard_of_mortality(X9,X10) = very_low
| ~ has_immunity(X9,X10) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) != hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& has_immunity(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& has_immunity(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& organization(esk1_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ organization(X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X1,X2)
| hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
has_immunity(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
organization(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
has_immunity(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) != hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0) = very_low,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) = very_low,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_10]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:24:25 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.34 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.38 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.40 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.40 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.40 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % sh5l with pid 670505 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.12/0.40 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.40 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.40 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.40 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.40 % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.40 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % SubtermCWHack with pid 670509 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.40 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.40 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.40 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.40 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.40 % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.40 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.40 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.40 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.40 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.40 % Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.12/0.40 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.12/0.40 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.12/0.40 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.12/0.40 % Processed clauses : 10
% 0.12/0.40 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.12/0.40 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.12/0.40 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.12/0.40 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.12/0.40 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.12/0.40 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.12/0.40 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.40 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.40 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.40 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.40 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.40 % Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.40 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.12/0.40 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.12/0.40 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.12/0.40 % ...number of literals in the above : 18
% 0.12/0.40 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.40 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.12/0.40 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.12/0.40 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.40 % Termbank termtop insertions : 779
% 0.12/0.40 % Search garbage collected termcells : 175
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.40 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.40 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.40 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.40 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.12/0.40
% 0.12/0.40 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.40 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.40 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.40 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.40 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------