↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : MGT059+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:00:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.14s 7.51s
% Output   : Refutation 4.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  21 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  234 (  14   ~;  10   |;  29   &; 153   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  25  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  14 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0   ^;  39   !;   0   ?;  39   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(organization_decl,type,
    organization: $i > $o ).

thf(has_immunity_decl,type,
    has_immunity: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(hazard_of_mortality_decl,type,
    hazard_of_mortality: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(smaller_or_equal_decl,type,
    smaller_or_equal: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(smaller_decl,type,
    smaller: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(greater_or_equal_decl,type,
    greater_or_equal: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(greater_decl,type,
    greater: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(very_low_decl,type,
    very_low: $i ).

thf(is_aligned_decl,type,
    is_aligned: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(positional_advantage_decl,type,
    positional_advantage: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(low_decl,type,
    low: $i ).

thf(mod1_decl,type,
    mod1: $i ).

thf(mod2_decl,type,
    mod2: $i ).

thf(high_decl,type,
    high: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
        & ( A @ organization ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
        = ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_2) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
          & ( A @ organization ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
          = ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( C @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
          & ( A @ organization ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
          = ( C @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) )
    <=> ( A @ ( B @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_smaller) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ greater ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ greater ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ greater ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',meaning_postulate_greater_transitive) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ greater ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ smaller_or_equal ) )
    <=> ( ( A = B )
        | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_smaller_or_equal) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ smaller_or_equal ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ smaller_or_equal ) )
       => ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ greater_or_equal ) )
    <=> ( ( A = B )
        | ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_greater_or_equal) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ greater_or_equal ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ greater_or_equal ) )
       => ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ greater ) )
      | ( A = B )
      | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',meaning_postulate_greater_comparable) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ greater ) )
      | ( A = B )
      | ( B @ ( A @ smaller ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( A @ ( B @ greater ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',meaning_postulate_greater_strict) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( A @ ( B @ greater ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ organization )
     => ( ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
         => ( ( ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ positional_advantage ) )
                & ~ ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
                = high ) )
            & ( ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ positional_advantage ) )
                & ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
                = mod2 ) )
            & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ positional_advantage ) )
                & ~ ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
                = mod1 ) )
            & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ positional_advantage ) )
                & ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
                = low ) ) ) )
        & ( ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
         => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
            = very_low ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ organization )
     => ( ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
         => ( ( ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ positional_advantage ) )
                & ~ ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
                = high ) )
            & ( ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ positional_advantage ) )
                & ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
                = mod2 ) )
            & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ positional_advantage ) )
                & ~ ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
                = mod1 ) )
            & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ positional_advantage ) )
                & ( B @ ( A @ is_aligned ) ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
                = low ) ) ) )
        & ( ( B @ ( A @ has_immunity ) )
         => ( ( B @ ( A @ hazard_of_mortality ) )
            = very_low ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(68,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,37,46,17,27,48,43,51]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT059+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/5.40  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/5.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/5.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/5.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/5.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/5.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/5.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/5.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:10:34 UTC 2026
% 0.13/5.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/5.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.18/6.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.35/6.20  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (202ms). 
% 1.35/6.22  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.00/6.63  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.00/6.64  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.21/6.75  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.21/6.79  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.36/6.82  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.36/6.82  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.36/6.83  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.14/7.50  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.14/7.50  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.14/7.50  % Time passed: 1950ms (effective reasoning time: 1277ms)
% 4.14/7.50  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.14/7.50  % Axioms used in derivation (7): assumption_17, definition_smaller_or_equal, definition_smaller, meaning_postulate_greater_comparable, meaning_postulate_greater_transitive, meaning_postulate_greater_strict, definition_greater_or_equal
% 4.14/7.50  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 4.14/7.51  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1950 ms resp. 1277 ms w/o parsing
% 4.14/7.56  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.14/7.56  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------