↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : MGT060-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:04:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.05s 1.25s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : MGT060-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  7 13:35:08 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.32/0.51  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 1.05/1.24  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.05/1.24  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 1.05/1.24  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 1.05/1.24  % Transform   :cnf
% 1.05/1.24  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 1.05/1.24  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 1.05/1.24  
% 1.05/1.24  % Result      :Theorem 0.755397s
% 1.05/1.24  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.755397s
% 1.05/1.24  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.05/1.25  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/1.25  % File     : MGT060-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 1.05/1.25  % Domain   : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 1.05/1.25  % Problem  : Hazard of mortality is lower during periods of immunity
% 1.05/1.25  % Version  : [Han98] axioms.
% 1.05/1.25  % English  : An organization's hazard of mortality is lower during periods in
% 1.05/1.25  %            which it has immunity than in periods in which it does not.
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  % Refs     : [Kam00] Kamps (2000), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 1.05/1.25  %          : [CH00]  Carroll & Hannan (2000), The Demography of Corporation
% 1.05/1.25  %          : [Han98] Hannan (1998), Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizati
% 1.05/1.25  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 1.05/1.25  % Names    :
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 1.05/1.25  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.3.0, 0.09 v9.1.0, 0.10 v9.0.0, 0.15 v8.2.0, 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.05 v7.5.0, 0.11 v7.4.0, 0.18 v7.3.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.08 v7.0.0, 0.13 v6.4.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.09 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.15 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.19 v5.1.0, 0.18 v5.0.0, 0.14 v4.1.0, 0.15 v4.0.1, 0.09 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.09 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.21 v3.2.0, 0.15 v3.1.0, 0.27 v2.7.0, 0.17 v2.6.0, 0.22 v2.5.0, 0.44 v2.4.0
% 1.05/1.25  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (   9 unt;   7 nHn;  23 RR)
% 1.05/1.25  %            Number of literals    :   58 (  10 equ;  24 neg)
% 1.05/1.25  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
% 1.05/1.25  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 1.05/1.25  %            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 1.05/1.25  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
% 1.05/1.25  %            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn)
% 1.05/1.25  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  % Comments : See MGT042+1.p for the mnemonic names.
% 1.05/1.25  %          : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT060+1.p
% 1.05/1.25  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/1.25  include('Axioms/MGT001-0.ax').
% 1.05/1.25  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_17_32,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      ( ~ organization(A)
% 1.05/1.25      | ~ has_immunity(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | hazard_of_mortality(A,B) = very_low ) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_17_33,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      ( ~ organization(A)
% 1.05/1.25      | has_immunity(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | ~ is_aligned(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | ~ positional_advantage(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | hazard_of_mortality(A,B) = low ) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_17_34,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      ( ~ organization(A)
% 1.05/1.25      | has_immunity(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | is_aligned(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | ~ positional_advantage(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | hazard_of_mortality(A,B) = mod1 ) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_17_35,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      ( ~ organization(A)
% 1.05/1.25      | has_immunity(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | ~ is_aligned(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | positional_advantage(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | hazard_of_mortality(A,B) = mod2 ) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_17_36,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      ( ~ organization(A)
% 1.05/1.25      | has_immunity(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | is_aligned(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | positional_advantage(A,B)
% 1.05/1.25      | hazard_of_mortality(A,B) = high ) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_18a_37,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      greater(high,mod1) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_18b_38,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      greater(mod1,low) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_18c_39,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      greater(low,very_low) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_18d_40,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      greater(high,mod2) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_18e_41,axiom,
% 1.05/1.25      greater(mod2,low) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_3_42,negated_conjecture,
% 1.05/1.25      organization(sk1) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_3_43,negated_conjecture,
% 1.05/1.25      has_immunity(sk1,sk2) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_3_44,negated_conjecture,
% 1.05/1.25      ~ has_immunity(sk1,sk3) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  cnf(assumption_3_45,negated_conjecture,
% 1.05/1.25      ~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)) ).
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/1.25  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.05/1.25  % Proof found
% 1.05/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.05/1.25  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.05/1.25  %ClaNum:45(EqnAxiom:20)
% 1.05/1.25  %VarNum:93(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 1.05/1.25  %MaxLitNum:5
% 1.05/1.25  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 1.05/1.25  %SharedTerms:19
% 1.05/1.25  %goalClause: 21 27 28 29
% 1.05/1.25  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 1.05/1.25  [21]P1(a1)
% 1.05/1.25  [22]P2(a2,a7)
% 1.05/1.25  [23]P2(a5,a2)
% 1.05/1.25  [24]P2(a6,a2)
% 1.05/1.25  [25]P2(a3,a5)
% 1.05/1.25  [26]P2(a3,a6)
% 1.05/1.25  [27]P3(a1,a8)
% 1.05/1.25  [28]~P3(a1,a9)
% 1.05/1.25  [29]~P2(f4(a1,a9),f4(a1,a8))
% 1.05/1.25  [30]~E(x301,x302)+P6(x301,x302)
% 1.05/1.25  [31]~E(x311,x312)+P4(x311,x312)
% 1.05/1.25  [33]~P7(x331,x332)+P6(x331,x332)
% 1.05/1.25  [34]~P2(x342,x341)+P7(x341,x342)
% 1.05/1.25  [35]~P2(x351,x352)+P4(x351,x352)
% 1.05/1.25  [36]~P7(x362,x361)+P2(x361,x362)
% 1.05/1.25  [40]~P2(x402,x401)+~P2(x401,x402)
% 1.05/1.25  [32]P7(x321,x322)+P2(x321,x322)+E(x321,x322)
% 1.05/1.25  [37]P7(x371,x372)+~P6(x371,x372)+E(x371,x372)
% 1.05/1.25  [38]P2(x381,x382)+~P4(x381,x382)+E(x381,x382)
% 1.05/1.25  [39]~P1(x391)+~P3(x391,x392)+E(f4(x391,x392),a7)
% 1.05/1.25  [41]~P2(x411,x413)+P2(x411,x412)+~P2(x413,x412)
% 1.05/1.25  [42]P3(x421,x422)+P5(x421,x422)+P8(x421,x422)+~P1(x421)+E(f4(x421,x422),a3)
% 1.05/1.25  [43]P3(x431,x432)+P5(x431,x432)+~P1(x431)+~P8(x431,x432)+E(f4(x431,x432),a5)
% 1.05/1.25  [44]P3(x441,x442)+P8(x441,x442)+~P1(x441)+~P5(x441,x442)+E(f4(x441,x442),a6)
% 1.05/1.25  [45]P3(x451,x452)+~P1(x451)+~P5(x451,x452)+~P8(x451,x452)+E(f4(x451,x452),a2)
% 1.05/1.26  %EqnAxiom
% 1.05/1.26  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 1.05/1.26  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 1.05/1.26  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 1.05/1.26  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f4(x41,x43),f4(x42,x43))
% 1.05/1.26  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x53,x51),f4(x53,x52))
% 1.05/1.26  [6]~P1(x61)+P1(x62)+~E(x61,x62)
% 1.05/1.26  [7]P2(x72,x73)+~E(x71,x72)+~P2(x71,x73)
% 1.05/1.26  [8]P2(x83,x82)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x83,x81)
% 1.05/1.26  [9]P5(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P5(x91,x93)
% 1.05/1.26  [10]P5(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P5(x103,x101)
% 1.05/1.26  [11]P8(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P8(x111,x113)
% 1.05/1.26  [12]P8(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P8(x123,x121)
% 1.05/1.26  [13]P3(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x131,x133)
% 1.05/1.26  [14]P3(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P3(x143,x141)
% 1.05/1.26  [15]P4(x152,x153)+~E(x151,x152)+~P4(x151,x153)
% 1.05/1.26  [16]P4(x163,x162)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x161)
% 1.05/1.26  [17]P7(x172,x173)+~E(x171,x172)+~P7(x171,x173)
% 1.05/1.26  [18]P7(x183,x182)+~E(x181,x182)+~P7(x183,x181)
% 1.05/1.26  [19]P6(x192,x193)+~E(x191,x192)+~P6(x191,x193)
% 1.05/1.26  [20]P6(x203,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P6(x203,x201)
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(48,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P7(f4(a1,a8),f4(a1,a9))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,36])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(50,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P2(a7,a2)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,22,36,40])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(52,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (P2(a5,a7)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,22,23,36,40,41])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(72,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P2(a7,a5)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[52,50,36,40])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(74,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (P2(a3,a7)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[52,25,50,36,40,41])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(95,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P2(a7,a3)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,72,36,40])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(97,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (P2(a3,a2)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,26,72,24,36,40,41])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(100,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (E(a7,a5)+P7(a7,a5)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[74,26,72,24,25,36,40,41,7,32])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(115,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P2(a2,a3)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[97,95,36,40])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(133,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P2(a2,a5)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[23,115,36,40])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(142,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P2(a2,a6)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,133,36,40])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(148,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(a7,f4(a1,a8))+~E(a5,f4(a1,a9))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[48,24,25,133,22,36,40,7,8,100,18,17])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(156,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P2(a5,a3)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[25,142,36,40])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(171,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(a7,a6)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,22,142,156,36,40,8])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(242,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(a7,f4(a1,a8))+~E(a3,f4(a1,a9))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,74,7,8])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(252,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(a7,f4(a1,a8))+~E(a2,f4(a1,a9))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,22,7,8])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(323,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(a7,f4(a1,a8))+~E(a6,f4(a1,a9))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,48,22,171,41,40,32,18,17])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(427,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a9),a5)+~E(a7,f4(a1,a8))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[148,2])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(429,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a9),a3)+~E(a7,f4(a1,a8))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[242,2])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(431,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a9),a2)+~E(a7,f4(a1,a8))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[252,2])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(433,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a9),a6)+~E(a7,f4(a1,a8))),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[323,2])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(436,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a8),a7)+~E(f4(a1,a9),a5)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[427,2])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(438,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a8),a7)+~E(f4(a1,a9),a3)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[429,2])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(440,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a8),a7)+~E(f4(a1,a9),a2)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[431,2])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(442,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a8),a7)+~E(f4(a1,a9),a6)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[433,2])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(444,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a9),a5)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,27,436,39])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(445,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (P5(a1,a9)+~P8(a1,a9)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,28,444,43])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(448,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P8(x4481,a9)+~E(x4481,a1)+P5(a1,a9)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[445,11])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(450,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a9),a3)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,27,438,39])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(456,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a9),a2)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,27,440,39])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(463,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(f4(a1,a9),a6)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,27,442,39])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(466,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~P5(a1,a9)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,28,456,463,44,45])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(472,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     (~E(x4721,a1)+~P8(x4721,a9)),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[466,448])).
% 1.05/1.26  cnf(475,plain,
% 1.05/1.26     ($false),
% 1.05/1.26     inference(scs_inference,[],[450,466,21,28,472,42]),
% 1.05/1.26     ['proof']).
% 1.05/1.26  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.05/1.26  % Total time :0.755397s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------