↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : MGT060-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:26:57 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  23 unt;  18 nHn;  44 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  133 (  34 equ;  51 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(assumption_17_32,axiom,
    ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17_32) ).

cnf(assumption_17_33,axiom,
    ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17_33) ).

cnf(assumption_17_35,axiom,
    ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
    | positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17_35) ).

cnf(assumption_17_34,axiom,
    ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
    | is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17_34) ).

cnf(assumption_17_36,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
    | positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17_36) ).

cnf(assumption_3_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_3_45) ).

cnf(assumption_3_42,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_3_42) ).

cnf(meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10,axiom,
    ( ~ greater(X2,X3)
    | ~ greater(X1,X2)
    | greater(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10) ).

cnf(assumption_3_43,negated_conjecture,
    has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_3_43) ).

cnf(assumption_18c_39,axiom,
    greater(low,very_low),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_18c_39) ).

cnf(assumption_18e_41,axiom,
    greater(mod2,low),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_18e_41) ).

cnf(assumption_18d_40,axiom,
    greater(high,mod2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_18d_40) ).

cnf(assumption_3_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_3_44) ).

cnf(assumption_18b_38,axiom,
    greater(mod1,low),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_18b_38) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
    | positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
    | is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
    | positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_17_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_3_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1),
    assumption_3_42 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X2,X3)
    | ~ greater(X1,X2)
    | greater(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
    | positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
    | is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
    | positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ has_immunity(sk1,X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = very_low ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
    assumption_3_43 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X2,X3)
    | ~ greater(X1,X2)
    | greater(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    greater(low,very_low),
    assumption_18c_39 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1)
    | ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2)
    | is_aligned(X1,X2)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    greater(mod2,low),
    assumption_18e_41 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),very_low),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X1,low)
    | greater(X1,very_low) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1)
    | has_immunity(X1,X2)
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod2
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = low
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = high
    | hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = mod1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X1,mod2)
    | greater(X1,low) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    greater(high,mod2),
    assumption_18d_40 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[assumption_3_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),low),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( has_immunity(sk1,X1)
    | hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = mod1
    | hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = high
    | hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = low
    | hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = mod2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    greater(high,low),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
    c_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = mod2
    | hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = low
    | hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = mod1 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = mod1
    | hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = low ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_45]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,axiom,
    greater(mod1,low),
    assumption_18b_38 ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = low,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_48]),c_0_31])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT060-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:29:58 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.69/0.53  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.69/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.69/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 1913516 completed with status 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.69/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.69/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.69/0.53  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.69/0.53  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.69/0.53  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 1913523 completed with status 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.69/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.69/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.69/0.53  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.69/0.53  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.69/0.53  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.53  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.69/0.53  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.69/0.53  
% 0.69/0.53  % Proof found!
% 0.69/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.69/0.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.69/0.53  % Parsed axioms                        : 25
% 0.69/0.53  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Initial clauses                      : 25
% 0.69/0.53  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
% 0.69/0.53  % Processed clauses                    : 1142
% 0.69/0.53  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % ...subsumed                          : 867
% 0.69/0.53  % ...remaining for further processing  : 275
% 0.69/0.53  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.69/0.53  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 0.69/0.53  % Backward-rewritten                   : 72
% 0.69/0.53  % Generated clauses                    : 5701
% 0.69/0.53  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4460
% 0.69/0.53  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Paramodulations                      : 5645
% 0.69/0.53  % Factorizations                       : 54
% 0.69/0.53  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.69/0.53  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1474
% 0.69/0.53  % ...of those cached                   : 1466
% 0.69/0.53  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.69/0.53  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.69/0.53  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.69/0.53  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.69/0.53  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.69/0.53  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.69/0.53  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.69/0.53  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.69/0.53  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.69/0.53  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.69/0.53  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.69/0.53  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.69/0.53  % Current number of processed clauses  : 162
% 0.69/0.53  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.69/0.53  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.69/0.53  %    Negative unit clauses             : 10
% 0.69/0.53  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 141
% 0.69/0.53  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3289
% 0.69/0.53  % ...number of literals in the above   : 18178
% 0.69/0.53  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Current number of archived clauses   : 111
% 0.69/0.53  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10919
% 0.69/0.53  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5374
% 0.69/0.53  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 334
% 0.69/0.53  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 152
% 0.69/0.53  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.69/0.53  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.69/0.53  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.69/0.53  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 74801
% 0.69/0.53  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 38
% 0.69/0.53  
% 0.69/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.69/0.53  % User time                : 0.101 s
% 0.69/0.53  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.69/0.53  % Total time               : 0.105 s
% 0.69/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.69/0.53  
% 0.69/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.69/0.53  % User time                : 0.472 s
% 0.69/0.53  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 0.69/0.53  % Total time               : 0.498 s
% 0.69/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.69/0.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------