↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT061-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.97s 1.21s
% Output   : Refutation 0.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT061-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:36:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.97/1.21  
% 0.97/1.21  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.97/1.21  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.97/1.21  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.97/1.21  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.97/1.21  SPASS derived 3894 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 4 splits and kept 1257 clauses.
% 0.97/1.21  SPASS allocated 78210 KBytes.
% 0.97/1.21  SPASS spent	0:00:00.82 on the problem.
% 0.97/1.21  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.97/1.21  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.97/1.21  		0:00:00.08 for inferences.
% 0.97/1.21  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.97/1.21  		0:00:00.61 for the reduction.
% 0.97/1.21  
% 0.97/1.21  
% 0.97/1.21  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 64 :
% 0.97/1.21  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.97/1.21  1[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v)* -> has_endowment(u).
% 0.97/1.21  2[0:Inp] || dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> organization(u).
% 0.97/1.21  4[0:Inp] || is_aligned(u,v) is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,w,v)* -> .
% 0.97/1.21  6[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,v,w)*.
% 0.97/1.21  9[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero)** -> is_aligned(u,v).
% 0.97/1.21  10[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),sigma) equal(age(u,w),zero) -> dissimilar(u,w,v)*.
% 0.97/1.21  11[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.97/1.21  12[0:Inp] fragile_position(u) || smaller_or_equal(age(u,v),sigma)* -> positional_advantage(u,v).
% 0.97/1.21  13[0:Inp] fragile_position(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) greater(age(u,v),sigma)*l -> .
% 0.97/1.21  19[0:Inp] organization(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) is_aligned(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),low)**.
% 0.97/1.21  22[0:Inp] organization(u) ||  -> positional_advantage(u,v) is_aligned(u,v) has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),high)**.
% 0.97/1.21  26[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(high,mod2)*l.
% 0.97/1.21  27[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(mod2,low)*l.
% 0.97/1.21  28[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(sk2)*.
% 0.97/1.21  29[0:Inp] ||  -> fragile_position(sk2)*.
% 0.97/1.21  30[0:Inp] || has_endowment(sk2)* -> .
% 0.97/1.21  31[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(age(sk2,sk3),zero)**.
% 0.97/1.21  32[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(sigma,zero)*l.
% 0.97/1.21  33[0:Inp] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(age(sk2,sk4),sigma)*.
% 0.97/1.21  34[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(sk2,sk5),sigma)*l.
% 0.97/1.21  35[0:Inp] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)) greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4))*l -> .
% 0.97/1.21  37[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> smaller_or_equal(u,v).
% 0.97/1.21  43[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> smaller(v,u)*.
% 0.97/1.21  45[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.97/1.21  47[0:MRR:11.0,2.1] || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.97/1.21  48[0:Res:29.0,13.0] || positional_advantage(sk2,u) greater(age(sk2,u),sigma)*l -> .
% 0.97/1.21  49[0:Res:29.0,12.0] || smaller_or_equal(age(sk2,u),sigma)* -> positional_advantage(sk2,u).
% 0.97/1.21  51[0:Res:28.0,19.0] || is_aligned(sk2,u) positional_advantage(sk2,u) -> has_immunity(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),low)**.
% 0.97/1.21  54[0:Res:28.0,22.0] ||  -> has_immunity(sk2,u) is_aligned(sk2,u) positional_advantage(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),high)**.
% 0.97/1.21  55[0:Res:28.0,6.0] || is_aligned(sk2,u) -> is_aligned(sk2,v) dissimilar(sk2,u,v)*.
% 0.97/1.21  59[0:Res:28.0,1.0] || has_immunity(sk2,u)* -> has_endowment(sk2).
% 0.97/1.21  61[0:Res:33.0,12.1] fragile_position(sk2) ||  -> positional_advantage(sk2,sk4)*.
% 0.97/1.21  63[0:Res:31.0,47.0] || dissimilar(sk2,sk3,u)* -> greater(age(sk2,u),sigma).
% 0.97/1.21  65[0:Res:31.0,9.1] organization(sk2) ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.97/1.21  72[0:Res:32.0,43.0] ||  -> smaller(zero,sigma)*.
% 0.97/1.21  75[0:Res:34.0,10.2] organization(sk2) || equal(age(sk2,u),zero) -> dissimilar(sk2,u,sk5)*.
% 0.97/1.21  84[0:MRR:59.1,30.0] || has_immunity(sk2,u)* -> .
% 0.97/1.21  85[0:MRR:61.0,29.0] ||  -> positional_advantage(sk2,sk4)*.
% 0.97/1.21  86[0:MRR:65.0,28.0] ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.97/1.21  88[0:MRR:75.0,28.0] || equal(age(sk2,u),zero) -> dissimilar(sk2,u,sk5)*.
% 0.97/1.21  89[0:MRR:54.0,84.0] ||  -> positional_advantage(sk2,u) is_aligned(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),high)**.
% 0.97/1.21  92[0:MRR:51.2,84.0] || positional_advantage(sk2,u) is_aligned(sk2,u) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),low)**.
% 0.97/1.21  95[0:Res:31.0,88.0] ||  -> dissimilar(sk2,sk3,sk5)*.
% 0.97/1.21  102[0:Res:72.0,37.0] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma)*.
% 0.97/1.21  105[0:SpL:31.0,49.0] || smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma) -> positional_advantage(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.97/1.21  108[0:MRR:105.0,102.0] ||  -> positional_advantage(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.97/1.21  148[0:Res:95.0,4.2] || is_aligned(sk2,sk5)* is_aligned(sk2,sk3) -> .
% 0.97/1.21  152[0:MRR:148.1,86.0] || is_aligned(sk2,sk5)* -> .
% 0.97/1.21  190[0:Res:55.2,63.0] || is_aligned(sk2,sk3) -> is_aligned(sk2,u) greater(age(sk2,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.97/1.21  195[0:MRR:190.0,86.0] ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,u) greater(age(sk2,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.97/1.21  206[0:Res:195.1,48.1] || positional_advantage(sk2,u)* -> is_aligned(sk2,u).
% 0.97/1.21  214[0:MRR:89.0,206.0] ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),high)**.
% 0.97/1.21  215[0:MRR:92.1,206.1] || positional_advantage(sk2,u) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),low)**.
% 0.97/1.21  385[0:SpL:214.1,35.1] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)) greater(high,hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4))*r -> is_aligned(sk2,sk5).
% 0.97/1.21  391[0:MRR:385.2,152.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)) greater(high,hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4))*r -> .
% 0.97/1.21  953[0:CRe:45.0,26.0] || greater(mod2,u)*+ -> greater(high,u)*.
% 0.97/1.21  1233[0:Res:27.0,953.0] ||  -> greater(high,low)*l.
% 0.97/1.21  4095[0:SpL:215.1,391.1] || positional_advantage(sk2,sk4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3))** greater(high,low) -> .
% 0.97/1.21  4106[0:Rew:215.1,4095.1] || positional_advantage(sk2,sk4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3),low)** greater(high,low) -> .
% 0.97/1.21  4107[0:MRR:4106.0,4106.2,85.0,1233.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3),low)** -> .
% 0.97/1.21  4111[0:SpL:19.4,4107.0] organization(sk2) || positional_advantage(sk2,sk3) is_aligned(sk2,sk3) equal(low,low) -> has_immunity(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.97/1.21  4118[0:Obv:4111.3] organization(sk2) || positional_advantage(sk2,sk3) is_aligned(sk2,sk3) -> has_immunity(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.97/1.21  4119[0:SSi:4118.0,29.0,28.0] || positional_advantage(sk2,sk3) is_aligned(sk2,sk3) -> has_immunity(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.97/1.21  4120[0:MRR:4119.0,4119.1,4119.2,108.0,86.0,84.0] ||  -> .
% 0.97/1.21  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.97/1.21  Formulae used in the proof : assumption_1_39 definition_2_40 definition_2_42 definition_2_44 assumption_13_47 assumption_15_48 assumption_15_49 definition_3_50 definition_3_51 assumption_17_57 assumption_17_60 assumption_18d_64 assumption_18e_65 theorem_7_66 theorem_7_67 theorem_7_68 theorem_7_69 theorem_7_70 theorem_7_71 theorem_7_72 theorem_7_73 definition_smaller_or_equal_2 definition_smaller_8 meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10
% 0.97/1.21  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------