↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT062-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT062-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:39:54 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.50  
% 0.23/0.50  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.23/0.50  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.23/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.50  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.23/0.50  SPASS derived 179 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 105 clauses.
% 0.23/0.50  SPASS allocated 75786 KBytes.
% 0.23/0.50  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.23/0.50  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.23/0.50  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.23/0.50  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.23/0.50  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.23/0.50  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.23/0.50  
% 0.23/0.50  
% 0.23/0.50  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 67 :
% 0.23/0.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.23/0.50  1[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v)* -> has_endowment(u).
% 0.23/0.50  2[0:Inp] || dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> organization(u).
% 0.23/0.50  4[0:Inp] || is_aligned(u,v) is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,w,v)* -> .
% 0.23/0.50  6[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,v,w)*.
% 0.23/0.50  9[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero)** -> is_aligned(u,v).
% 0.23/0.50  10[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),sigma) equal(age(u,w),zero) -> dissimilar(u,w,v)*.
% 0.23/0.50  11[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.23/0.51  12[0:Inp] robust_position(u) || smaller_or_equal(age(u,v),tau)* positional_advantage(u,v) -> .
% 0.23/0.51  13[0:Inp] robust_position(u) || greater(age(u,v),tau)*l -> positional_advantage(u,v).
% 0.23/0.51  20[0:Inp] organization(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,v) has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),mod1)**.
% 0.23/0.51  21[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> positional_advantage(u,v) has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),mod2)**.
% 0.23/0.51  23[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(mod2,mod1)*l.
% 0.23/0.51  24[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(sk2)*.
% 0.23/0.51  25[0:Inp] ||  -> robust_position(sk2)*.
% 0.23/0.51  26[0:Inp] || has_endowment(sk2)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  27[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(age(sk2,sk3),zero)**.
% 0.23/0.51  29[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(tau,zero)*l.
% 0.23/0.51  30[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(tau,sigma)**.
% 0.23/0.51  31[0:Inp] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(age(sk2,sk4),sigma)*.
% 0.23/0.51  32[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(sk2,sk5),sigma)*l.
% 0.23/0.51  33[0:Inp] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4))* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  35[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> smaller_or_equal(u,v).
% 0.23/0.51  41[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> smaller(v,u)*.
% 0.23/0.51  45[0:Rew:30.0,29.0] ||  -> greater(sigma,zero)*l.
% 0.23/0.51  47[0:Rew:30.0,12.1] robust_position(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) smaller_or_equal(age(u,v),sigma)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  49[0:Rew:30.0,13.1] robust_position(u) || greater(age(u,v),sigma)*l -> positional_advantage(u,v).
% 0.23/0.51  51[0:MRR:11.0,2.1] || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.23/0.51  52[0:Res:25.0,49.0] || greater(age(sk2,u),sigma)*l -> positional_advantage(sk2,u).
% 0.23/0.51  53[0:Res:25.0,47.0] || positional_advantage(sk2,u) smaller_or_equal(age(sk2,u),sigma)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  56[0:Res:24.0,20.0] || positional_advantage(sk2,u) -> has_immunity(sk2,u) is_aligned(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),mod1)**.
% 0.23/0.51  57[0:Res:24.0,21.0] || is_aligned(sk2,u) -> has_immunity(sk2,u) positional_advantage(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),mod2)**.
% 0.23/0.51  59[0:Res:24.0,6.0] || is_aligned(sk2,u) -> is_aligned(sk2,v) dissimilar(sk2,u,v)*.
% 0.23/0.51  61[0:Res:24.0,9.0] || equal(age(sk2,u),zero)** -> is_aligned(sk2,u).
% 0.23/0.51  63[0:Res:24.0,1.0] || has_immunity(sk2,u)* -> has_endowment(sk2).
% 0.23/0.51  69[0:Res:31.0,47.1] robust_position(sk2) || positional_advantage(sk2,sk4)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  71[0:Res:27.0,51.0] || dissimilar(sk2,sk3,u)* -> greater(age(sk2,u),sigma).
% 0.23/0.51  73[0:Res:27.0,9.1] organization(sk2) ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.23/0.51  80[0:Res:45.0,41.0] ||  -> smaller(zero,sigma)*.
% 0.23/0.51  83[0:Res:32.0,10.2] organization(sk2) || equal(age(sk2,u),zero) -> dissimilar(sk2,u,sk5)*.
% 0.23/0.51  100[0:MRR:63.1,26.0] || has_immunity(sk2,u)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  101[0:MRR:73.0,24.0] ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,sk3)*.
% 0.23/0.51  103[0:MRR:69.0,25.0] || positional_advantage(sk2,sk4)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  104[0:MRR:83.0,24.0] || equal(age(sk2,u),zero) -> dissimilar(sk2,u,sk5)*.
% 0.23/0.51  106[0:MRR:56.1,100.0] || positional_advantage(sk2,u) -> is_aligned(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),mod1)**.
% 0.23/0.51  107[0:MRR:57.1,100.0] || is_aligned(sk2,u) -> positional_advantage(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),mod2)**.
% 0.23/0.51  112[0:Res:80.0,35.0] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma)*.
% 0.23/0.51  118[0:SpL:27.0,53.1] || positional_advantage(sk2,sk3)* smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma) -> .
% 0.23/0.51  121[0:MRR:118.1,112.0] || positional_advantage(sk2,sk3)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  161[0:Res:104.1,4.2] || equal(age(sk2,u),zero)** is_aligned(sk2,sk5) is_aligned(sk2,u) -> .
% 0.23/0.51  164[0:MRR:161.2,61.1] || equal(age(sk2,u),zero)** is_aligned(sk2,sk5) -> .
% 0.23/0.51  168[0:SpL:27.0,164.0] || equal(zero,zero) is_aligned(sk2,sk5)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  169[0:Obv:168.0] || is_aligned(sk2,sk5)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  214[0:Res:59.2,71.0] || is_aligned(sk2,sk3) -> is_aligned(sk2,u) greater(age(sk2,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.23/0.51  217[0:MRR:214.0,101.0] ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,u) greater(age(sk2,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.23/0.51  220[0:Res:217.1,52.0] ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,u) positional_advantage(sk2,u)*.
% 0.23/0.51  223[0:MRR:107.0,220.0] ||  -> positional_advantage(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),mod2)**.
% 0.23/0.51  224[0:MRR:106.0,220.1] ||  -> is_aligned(sk2,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,u),mod1)**.
% 0.23/0.51  239[0:SpL:223.1,33.1] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk4),hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3)) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),mod2)* -> positional_advantage(sk2,sk4).
% 0.23/0.51  241[0:Rew:223.1,239.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3),mod2) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),mod2)* -> positional_advantage(sk2,sk4).
% 0.23/0.51  242[0:MRR:241.2,103.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3),mod2) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk5),mod2)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  256[0:SpL:224.1,242.1] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3),mod2)** smaller(mod1,mod2) -> is_aligned(sk2,sk5).
% 0.23/0.51  263[0:MRR:256.2,169.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk2,sk3),mod2)** smaller(mod1,mod2) -> .
% 0.23/0.51  265[0:SpL:223.1,263.0] || equal(mod2,mod2) smaller(mod1,mod2)* -> positional_advantage(sk2,sk3).
% 0.23/0.51  268[0:Obv:265.0] || smaller(mod1,mod2)* -> positional_advantage(sk2,sk3).
% 0.23/0.51  269[0:MRR:268.1,121.0] || smaller(mod1,mod2)* -> .
% 0.23/0.51  272[0:Res:41.1,269.0] || greater(mod2,mod1)*l -> .
% 0.23/0.51  273[0:MRR:272.0,23.0] ||  -> .
% 0.23/0.51  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.23/0.51  Formulae used in the proof : assumption_1_39 definition_2_40 definition_2_42 definition_2_44 assumption_13_47 assumption_15_48 assumption_15_49 definition_4_50 definition_4_51 assumption_17_58 assumption_17_59 assumption_19_61 theorem_8_62 theorem_8_63 theorem_8_64 theorem_8_65 theorem_8_67 theorem_8_68 theorem_8_69 theorem_8_70 theorem_8_71 definition_smaller_or_equal_2 definition_smaller_8
% 0.23/0.51  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------