%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : MGT063+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:09:52 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Theorem 10.79s 1.91s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT063+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 13:41:07 UTC 2026 % 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m % 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst. % 0.13/0.37 # % 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 57 Number of unprocessed: 54 % 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.37 # 54 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 12 conjectures. % 0.13/0.37 # There are 12 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.37 # Found 19 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.37 # 12 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.37 # 35 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.37 # 19 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 10.79/1.91 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 10.79/1.91 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 10.79/1.91 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 10.79/1.91 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 10.79/1.91 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 10.79/1.91 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 10.79/1.91 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 10.79/1.91 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 10.79/1.91 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 10.79/1.91 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 10.79/1.91 # Begin clausification derivation % 10.79/1.91 % 10.79/1.91 # End clausification derivation % 10.79/1.91 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (organization(esk5_0))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (robust_position(esk5_0))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (age(esk5_0,esk6_0)=zero)). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (smaller(sigma,tau))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (greater(sigma,zero))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (greater(tau,zero))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (greater(low,very_low))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk5_0,esk7_0),sigma))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(esk5_0,esk8_0),tau))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk5_0,esk8_0),sigma))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(esk5_0,esk9_0),tau))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (greater(mod1,low))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (greater(mod2,low))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (greater(mod2,mod1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (greater(high,mod1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (greater(high,mod2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (~has_endowment(esk5_0))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (organization(X1)|~has_endowment(X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (organization(X1)|~dissimilar(X1,X2,X3))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(esk5_0,esk6_0)!=hazard_of_mortality(esk5_0,esk7_0)|~smaller(hazard_of_mortality(esk5_0,esk7_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk5_0,esk8_0))|~smaller(hazard_of_mortality(esk5_0,esk9_0),hazard_of_mortality(esk5_0,esk7_0)))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~dissimilar(X1,X3,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~robust_position(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),tau))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=very_low|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|age(X1,X2)!=zero|~organization(X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),eta))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (epred1_2(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X2,X1)|~organization(X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~robust_position(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),tau))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X3)|~dissimilar(X1,X2,X3))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=low|~epred1_2(X2,X1)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (positional_advantage(X1,esk3_1(X1))|robust_position(X1)|~positional_advantage(X1,esk4_1(X1)))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greater(age(X1,X2),sigma)|age(X1,X3)!=zero|~dissimilar(X1,X3,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (robust_position(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk3_1(X1)),tau)|~positional_advantage(X1,esk4_1(X1)))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (robust_position(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk4_1(X1)),tau)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk3_1(X1)),tau))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)|age(X1,X2)!=zero|~organization(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X3),sigma))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (positional_advantage(X1,esk3_1(X1))|robust_position(X1)|greater(age(X1,esk4_1(X1)),tau))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod1|is_aligned(X1,X2)|~epred1_2(X2,X1)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod2|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~epred1_2(X2,X1)|~is_aligned(X1,X2))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|dissimilar(X1,X3,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=high|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X2)|~epred1_2(X2,X1))). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,esk1_1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))). % 10.79/1.91 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 10.79/1.91 # Begin printing tableau % 10.79/1.91 # Found 4 steps % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (greater(sigma,zero)), inference(start_rule)). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (greater(sigma,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (~greater(zero,sigma)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])). % 10.79/1.91 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (~smaller(sigma,zero)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_85, ...])). % 10.79/1.91 # End printing tableau % 10.79/1.91 # SZS output end % 10.79/1.91 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 10.79/1.92 # Child (1806625) has found a proof. % 10.79/1.92 % 10.79/1.92 # Proof search is over... % 10.79/1.92 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------