↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT065+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.79s 3.05s
% Output   : Refutation 2.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT065+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:48:00 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.79/3.05  
% 2.79/3.05  SPASS V 3.9 
% 2.79/3.05  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.79/3.05  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.79/3.05  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 2.79/3.05  SPASS derived 10099 clauses, backtracked 637 clauses, performed 6 splits and kept 2770 clauses.
% 2.79/3.05  SPASS allocated 103645 KBytes.
% 2.79/3.05  SPASS spent	0:00:02.55 on the problem.
% 2.79/3.05  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 2.79/3.05  		0:00:00.05 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.79/3.05  		0:00:00.21 for inferences.
% 2.79/3.05  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 2.79/3.05  		0:00:02.13 for the reduction.
% 2.79/3.05  
% 2.79/3.05  
% 2.79/3.05  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 66 :
% 2.79/3.05  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.79/3.05  1[0:Inp] ||  -> has_endowment(skc4)*.
% 2.79/3.05  2[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(skc4)*.
% 2.79/3.05  5[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(eta,zero)*r.
% 2.79/3.05  7[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(mod1,low)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  8[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(low,very_low)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  9[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(high,mod2)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  10[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(mod2,low)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  12[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(skc4,skc7),sigma)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  14[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(skc4,skc7),eta)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  15[0:Inp] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(age(skc4,skc6),eta)*.
% 2.79/3.05  18[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc5),zero)**.
% 2.79/3.05  21[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> smaller_or_equal(u,v).
% 2.79/3.05  26[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> smaller(v,u)*.
% 2.79/3.05  32[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 2.79/3.05  33[0:Inp] has_endowment(u) || smaller_or_equal(age(u,v),eta)* -> has_immunity(u,v).
% 2.79/3.05  34[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero)** -> is_aligned(u,v).
% 2.79/3.05  35[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),very_low)**.
% 2.79/3.05  36[0:Inp] has_endowment(u) || has_immunity(u,v) greater(age(u,v),eta)*l -> .
% 2.79/3.05  37[0:Inp] || is_aligned(u,v) is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,w,v)* -> .
% 2.79/3.05  42[0:Inp] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc7),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*l -> .
% 2.79/3.05  45[0:Inp] organization(u) ||  -> has_immunity(u,v) positional_advantage(u,v) is_aligned(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),high)**.
% 2.79/3.05  46[0:Inp] organization(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,v) is_aligned(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),mod1)**.
% 2.79/3.05  48[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),sigma) equal(age(u,w),zero) -> dissimilar(u,w,v)*.
% 2.79/3.05  63[0:Res:2.0,34.0] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** -> is_aligned(skc4,u).
% 2.79/3.05  64[0:Res:2.0,35.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,u),very_low)**.
% 2.79/3.05  66[0:Res:1.0,33.0] || smaller_or_equal(age(skc4,u),eta)* -> has_immunity(skc4,u).
% 2.79/3.05  77[0:Res:15.0,33.1] has_endowment(skc4) ||  -> has_immunity(skc4,skc6)*.
% 2.79/3.05  81[0:Res:5.0,26.0] ||  -> smaller(zero,eta)*.
% 2.79/3.05  91[0:Res:14.0,36.2] has_endowment(skc4) || has_immunity(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 2.79/3.05  100[0:Res:12.0,48.2] organization(skc4) || equal(age(skc4,u),zero) -> dissimilar(skc4,u,skc7)*.
% 2.79/3.05  110[0:MRR:77.0,1.0] ||  -> has_immunity(skc4,skc6)*.
% 2.79/3.05  111[0:MRR:91.0,1.0] || has_immunity(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 2.79/3.05  112[0:MRR:100.0,2.0] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero) -> dissimilar(skc4,u,skc7)*.
% 2.79/3.05  151[0:Res:81.0,21.0] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(zero,eta)*.
% 2.79/3.05  155[0:SpL:18.0,66.0] || smaller_or_equal(zero,eta) -> has_immunity(skc4,skc5)*.
% 2.79/3.05  157[0:MRR:155.0,151.0] ||  -> has_immunity(skc4,skc5)*.
% 2.79/3.05  189[0:Res:112.1,37.2] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** is_aligned(skc4,skc7) is_aligned(skc4,u) -> .
% 2.79/3.05  192[0:MRR:189.2,63.1] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** is_aligned(skc4,skc7) -> .
% 2.79/3.05  194[0:SpL:18.0,192.0] || equal(zero,zero) is_aligned(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 2.79/3.05  195[0:Obv:194.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 2.79/3.05  437[0:SpL:46.4,42.1] organization(skc4) || positional_advantage(skc4,skc7) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(mod1,hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*r -> has_immunity(skc4,skc7) is_aligned(skc4,skc7).
% 2.79/3.05  439[0:SpL:45.4,42.1] organization(skc4) || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(high,hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*r -> has_immunity(skc4,skc7) positional_advantage(skc4,skc7) is_aligned(skc4,skc7).
% 2.79/3.05  924[0:CRe:32.0,10.0] || greater(low,u)*+ -> greater(mod2,u)*.
% 2.79/3.05  926[0:CRe:32.0,7.0] || greater(low,u)*+ -> greater(mod1,u)*.
% 2.79/3.05  928[0:CRe:32.0,9.0] || greater(mod2,u)*+ -> greater(high,u)*.
% 2.79/3.05  989[0:Res:8.0,924.0] ||  -> greater(mod2,very_low)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  1049[0:Res:8.0,926.0] ||  -> greater(mod1,very_low)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  1082[0:Res:989.0,928.0] ||  -> greater(high,very_low)*l.
% 2.79/3.05  9597[0:SSi:439.0,1.0,2.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(high,hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*r -> has_immunity(skc4,skc7) positional_advantage(skc4,skc7) is_aligned(skc4,skc7).
% 2.79/3.05  9598[0:MRR:9597.2,9597.4,111.0,195.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(high,hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*r -> positional_advantage(skc4,skc7).
% 2.79/3.05  9599[0:SSi:437.0,1.0,2.0] || positional_advantage(skc4,skc7) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(mod1,hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*r -> has_immunity(skc4,skc7) is_aligned(skc4,skc7).
% 2.79/3.05  9600[0:MRR:9599.3,9599.4,111.0,195.0] || positional_advantage(skc4,skc7) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(mod1,hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*r -> .
% 2.79/3.05  10468[0:SpL:64.1,9598.1] || has_immunity(skc4,skc6) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5))** greater(high,very_low) -> positional_advantage(skc4,skc7).
% 2.79/3.05  10478[0:Rew:64.1,10468.1] || has_immunity(skc4,skc6) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5),very_low)** greater(high,very_low) -> positional_advantage(skc4,skc7).
% 2.79/3.05  10479[0:MRR:10478.0,10478.2,110.0,1082.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5),very_low)** -> positional_advantage(skc4,skc7).
% 2.79/3.05  10485[0:SpL:64.1,10479.0] || has_immunity(skc4,skc5) equal(very_low,very_low) -> positional_advantage(skc4,skc7)*.
% 2.79/3.05  10491[0:Obv:10485.1] || has_immunity(skc4,skc5) -> positional_advantage(skc4,skc7)*.
% 2.79/3.05  10492[0:MRR:10491.0,157.0] ||  -> positional_advantage(skc4,skc7)*.
% 2.79/3.05  10493[0:MRR:9600.0,10492.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(mod1,hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*r -> .
% 2.79/3.05  10507[0:SpL:64.1,10493.1] || has_immunity(skc4,skc6) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5))** greater(mod1,very_low) -> .
% 2.79/3.05  10517[0:Rew:64.1,10507.1] || has_immunity(skc4,skc6) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5),very_low)** greater(mod1,very_low) -> .
% 2.79/3.05  10518[0:MRR:10517.0,10517.2,110.0,1049.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5),very_low)** -> .
% 2.79/3.05  10529[0:SpL:35.2,10518.0] organization(skc4) || has_immunity(skc4,skc5)* equal(very_low,very_low) -> .
% 2.79/3.05  10532[0:Obv:10529.2] organization(skc4) || has_immunity(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 2.79/3.05  10533[0:SSi:10532.0,1.0,2.0] || has_immunity(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 2.79/3.05  10534[0:MRR:10533.0,157.0] ||  -> .
% 2.79/3.05  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.79/3.05  Formulae used in the proof : theorem_11 assumption_18b assumption_18c assumption_18d assumption_18e definition_smaller_or_equal definition_smaller meaning_postulate_greater_transitive definition_1 assumption_13 assumption_17 definition_2 assumption_15
% 2.79/3.05  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------