↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : MGT070+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:06:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 13.35s 13.67s
% Output   : Proof 13.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : MGT070+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  7 13:55:42 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 13.35/13.67  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 13.35/13.67  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), Iff (leq X Y) (Or (less X Y) (Eq X Y))) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #28 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (V InfD SupD : Iota), And (leq InfD V) (leq V SupD) → completion_compatible V InfD SupD) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #36 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), leq ninf X) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #37 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), leq X nsup) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #39 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun V => And (And (leq ninf V) (leq V nsup)) (completion_compatible V ninf nsup))) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #42 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (leq a nsup) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #43 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (leq ninf a) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #132 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Iff (leq a Y) (Or (less a Y) (Eq a Y))) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #133 (by clausification #[132]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Iff (leq a a_1) (Or (less a a_1) (Eq a a_1))) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #134 (by clausification #[133]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (leq a a_1) True) (Eq (Or (less a a_1) (Eq a a_1)) False)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #136 (by clausification #[134]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (leq a a_1) True) (Eq (Eq a a_1) False)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #138 (by clausification #[136]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (leq a a_1) True) (Ne a a_1)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #139 (by destructive equality resolution #[138]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (leq a a) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #154 (by clausification #[28]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (InfD SupD : Iota), And (leq InfD a) (leq a SupD) → completion_compatible a InfD SupD) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #155 (by clausification #[154]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (SupD : Iota), And (leq a a_1) (leq a_1 SupD) → completion_compatible a_1 a SupD) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #156 (by clausification #[155]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (And (leq a a_1) (leq a_1 a_2) → completion_compatible a_1 a a_2) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #157 (by clausification #[156]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (And (leq a a_1) (leq a_1 a_2)) False) (Eq (completion_compatible a_1 a a_2) True)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #158 (by clausification #[157]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (completion_compatible a a_1 a_2) True) (Or (Eq (leq a_1 a) False) (Eq (leq a a_2) False))
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #161 (by superposition #[158, 139]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (completion_compatible a a a_1) True) (Or (Eq (leq a a_1) False) (Eq False True))
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #726 (by clausification #[39]): Eq (Exists fun V => And (And (leq ninf V) (leq V nsup)) (completion_compatible V ninf nsup)) False
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #727 (by clausification #[726]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (And (leq ninf a) (leq a nsup)) (completion_compatible a ninf nsup)) False
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #728 (by clausification #[727]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (And (leq ninf a) (leq a nsup)) False) (Eq (completion_compatible a ninf nsup) False)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #729 (by clausification #[728]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (completion_compatible a ninf nsup) False) (Or (Eq (leq ninf a) False) (Eq (leq a nsup) False))
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #730 (by forward demodulation #[729, 43]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (completion_compatible a ninf nsup) False) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (leq a nsup) False))
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #731 (by clausification #[730]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (completion_compatible a ninf nsup) False) (Eq (leq a nsup) False)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #732 (by forward demodulation #[731, 42]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (completion_compatible a ninf nsup) False) (Eq True False)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #733 (by clausification #[732]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (completion_compatible a ninf nsup) False
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #1916 (by clausification #[161]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (completion_compatible a a a_1) True) (Eq (leq a a_1) False)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #1921 (by superposition #[1916, 43]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (completion_compatible ninf ninf a) True) (Eq False True)
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #1926 (by clausification #[1921]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (completion_compatible ninf ninf a) True
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #1927 (by superposition #[1926, 733]): Eq True False
% 13.35/13.67  Clause #1932 (by clausification #[1927]): False
% 13.35/13.67  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------