↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT070+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(6,axiom,
    leq(ninf,u),
    file('MGT070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    leq(u,nsup),
    file('MGT070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(39,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(u,v)
    | ~ leq(w,u)
    | completion_compatible(u,w,v) ),
    file('MGT070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(40,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(ninf,u)
    | ~ leq(u,nsup)
    | ~ completion_compatible(u,ninf,nsup) ),
    file('MGT070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(61,plain,
    ~ completion_compatible(u,ninf,nsup),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[40,6,7]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:40.0,40.1,6.0,7.0')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( ~ leq(ninf,u)
    | ~ leq(u,nsup) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[39,61]),
    [iquote('0:Res:39.2,61.0')] ).

cnf(63,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[62,6,7]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:62.0,62.1,6.0,7.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : MGT070+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.03/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 13:53:41 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.07/0.40  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.07/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.40  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.07/0.40  SPASS derived 1 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 54 clauses.
% 0.07/0.40  SPASS allocated 98341 KBytes.
% 0.07/0.40  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.07/0.40  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.07/0.40  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.07/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.07/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.07/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 7 :
% 0.07/0.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.40  Formulae used in the proof : h_inf_lb h_sup_ub completion_compat unknown_sound_compatible
% 0.07/0.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------