↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : MGT075+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:03:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  10   ~;   5   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   1 sgn   8   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(irreflexive,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ less(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',irreflexive) ).

fof(leq_antisym,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( leq(Y,X)
        & leq(X,Y) )
     => X = Y ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_antisym) ).

fof(less_implies_leq,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( less(X,Y)
     => leq(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',less_implies_leq) ).

fof(in_open,axiom,
    ! [X,A,B] :
      ( in_open(X,A,B)
    <=> ( less(X,B)
        & less(A,X) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',in_open) ).

fof(odrl302,conjecture,
    ~ ? [X] :
        ( leq(v600,X)
        & in_open(X,v0,v600) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',odrl302) ).

fof(odrl302_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [X] :
          ( leq(v600,X)
          & in_open(X,v0,v600) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl302]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    ( less(A,C)
    | ~ in_open(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[in_open]) ).

fof(nnf_22,plain,
    ? [X] :
      ( leq(v600,X)
      & in_open(X,v0,v600) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[odrl302_neg]) ).

fof(sk_odrl302_neg,plain,
    ( leq(v600,sK0)
    & in_open(sK0,v0,v600) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0)],[nnf_22]) ).

cnf(c_32,negated_conjecture,
    in_open(sK0,v0,v600),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_odrl302_neg]) ).

cnf(c_45,negated_conjecture,
    less(sK0,v600),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_46,negated_conjecture,
    leq(v600,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_odrl302_neg]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ( leq(A,B)
    | ~ less(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[less_implies_leq]) ).

cnf(c_77,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ leq(B,A)
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym]) ).

cnf(c_82,plain,
    ~ less(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[irreflexive]) ).

cnf(c_123,plain,
    leq(sK0,v600),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_132,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK0 = v600
    | ~ leq(sK0,v600) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_125,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 = v600,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_132]) ).

cnf(c_133,negated_conjecture,
    less(v600,v600),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_125,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_131,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_133]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : MGT075+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.42  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:14:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.43  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.43  % Process 3187944 was started by sandbox on n018,
% 0.11/0.43  % Sat Sep 26 00:14:05 2026
% 0.11/0.43  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.11/0.48  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.11/0.48  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.11/0.48  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.11/0.48  % Given clauses 28.
% 0.11/0.48  
% 0.11/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------