↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : MGT076+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:08:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.58s 2.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  13   ~;  11   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(odrl311,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( leq(v800,X1)
     => leq(v400,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl311) ).

fof(leq_trans,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X2)
        & leq(X2,X3) )
     => leq(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_trans) ).

fof(leq_def,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> ( less(X1,X2)
        | X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_def) ).

fof(ord_v400_v800,axiom,
    less(v400,v800),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v400_v800) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( leq(v800,X1)
       => leq(v400,X1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl311]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ~ leq(X31,X32)
      | ~ leq(X32,X33)
      | leq(X31,X33) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_trans])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(v800,esk4_0)
    & ~ leq(v400,esk4_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X3)
    | ~ leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    leq(v800,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(v400,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ leq(X1,v800) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X19,X20)
        | less(X19,X20)
        | X19 = X20 )
      & ( ~ less(X19,X20)
        | leq(X19,X20) )
      & ( X19 != X20
        | leq(X19,X20) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(v400,v800),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    less(v400,v800),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v400_v800]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT076+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.07/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:12:27 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.12/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 5.58/2.91  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 5.58/2.91  # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.58/2.91  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.58/2.91  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 5.58/2.91  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 5.58/2.91  #
% 5.58/2.91  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 5.58/2.91  
% 5.58/2.91  # Proof found!
% 5.58/2.91  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.58/2.91  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.58/2.91  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.58/2.91  
% 5.58/2.91  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.58/2.91  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 5.58/2.91  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 5.58/2.91  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 5.58/2.91  # Maximum resident set size: 3584 pages
% 5.58/2.91  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------