↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : MGT077+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:08:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 10.93s 3.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   39 (   0 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less(v100,X1)
    | ~ less(v200,X2)
    | ~ in_open(X1,v0,v500)
    | ~ in_open(X2,v0,v800) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ef_gio_h/input.p',i_0_43) ).

cnf(i_0_28,plain,
    ( in_open(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ less(X1,X3)
    | ~ less(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ef_gio_h/input.p',i_0_28) ).

cnf(i_0_48,plain,
    less(v100,v200),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ef_gio_h/input.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_45,plain,
    less(v0,v200),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ef_gio_h/input.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(i_0_51,plain,
    less(v200,v500),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ef_gio_h/input.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(i_0_46,plain,
    less(v0,v500),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ef_gio_h/input.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_53,plain,
    less(v500,v800),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ef_gio_h/input.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less(v100,X1)
    | ~ less(v200,X2)
    | ~ in_open(X1,v0,v500)
    | ~ in_open(X2,v0,v800) ),
    i_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( in_open(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ less(X1,X3)
    | ~ less(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in_open(X1,v0,v500)
    | ~ less(v100,X1)
    | ~ less(v200,X2)
    | ~ less(v0,X2)
    | ~ less(X2,v800) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( ~ less(v100,X1)
    | ~ less(v200,X2)
    | ~ less(v0,X2)
    | ~ less(X2,v800)
    | ~ less(v0,X1)
    | ~ less(X1,v500) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    less(v100,v200),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    less(v0,v200),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    less(v200,v500),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( ~ less(v200,X1)
    | ~ less(v0,X1)
    | ~ less(X1,v800) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_66]),c_0_67])]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    less(v0,v500),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    less(v500,v800),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_67]),c_0_69]),c_0_70])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT077+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:07:43 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.22/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.22/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 10.93/3.60  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 10.93/3.60  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 10.93/3.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 10.93/3.60  
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof found!
% 10.93/3.60  # SZS status Theorem
% 10.93/3.60  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object total steps             : 18
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 10.93/3.60  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 6
% 10.93/3.60  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.93/3.60  # Parsed axioms                        : 60
% 10.93/3.60  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Initial clauses                      : 60
% 10.93/3.60  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 60
% 10.93/3.60  # Processed clauses                    : 70
% 10.93/3.60  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 10.93/3.60  # ...remaining for further processing  : 67
% 10.93/3.60  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 10.93/3.60  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 10.93/3.60  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Generated clauses                    : 76
% 10.93/3.60  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 57
% 10.93/3.60  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Paramodulations                      : 73
% 10.93/3.60  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 10.93/3.60  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 10.93/3.60  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Current number of processed clauses  : 64
% 10.93/3.60  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 10.93/3.60  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.93/3.60  #    Negative unit clauses             : 13
% 10.93/3.60  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 35
% 10.93/3.60  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34
% 10.93/3.60  # ...number of literals in the above   : 85
% 10.93/3.60  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 10.93/3.60  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 211
% 10.93/3.60  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 143
% 10.93/3.60  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 10.93/3.60  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 74
% 10.93/3.60  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 10.93/3.60  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 10.93/3.60  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1585
% 10.93/3.60  
% 10.93/3.60  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.93/3.60  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 10.93/3.60  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 10.93/3.60  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 10.93/3.60  # ...preprocessing         : 0.015 s
% 10.93/3.60  # ...main loop             : 0.003 s
% 10.93/3.60  # Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 10.93/3.60  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------