↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : MGT079+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:27:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  173 (  71 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   21 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  238 ( 111   ~;  44   |;  79   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   22 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   4 sgn  23   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(leq_trans,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( leq(X2,X3)
        & leq(X1,X2) )
     => leq(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_trans) ).

fof(leq_def,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> ( X1 = X2
        | less(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_def) ).

fof(odrl350,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ( in_lopen(X3,v0,v16)
          & in_lopen(X2,v0,v800)
          & in_lopen(X1,v0,v1200) )
      & in_lopen(X3,v0,v32)
      & in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)
      & in_lopen(X1,v0,v600) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl350) ).

fof(in_lopen,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4,X5] :
      ( in_lopen(X1,X4,X5)
    <=> ( leq(X1,X5)
        & less(X4,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax',in_lopen) ).

fof(ord_v16_v600,axiom,
    less(v16,v600),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v16_v600) ).

fof(ord_v16_v32,axiom,
    less(v16,v32),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v16_v32) ).

fof(distinct,axiom,
    ( v800 != v1200
    & v600 != v1200
    & v600 != v800
    & v400 != v1200
    & v400 != v800
    & v400 != v600
    & v32 != v1200
    & v32 != v800
    & v32 != v600
    & v32 != v400
    & v16 != v1200
    & v16 != v800
    & v16 != v600
    & v16 != v400
    & v16 != v32
    & v0 != v1200
    & v0 != v800
    & v0 != v600
    & v0 != v400
    & v0 != v32
    & v0 != v16 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distinct) ).

fof(ord_v0_v400,axiom,
    less(v0,v400),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v400) ).

fof(leq_antisym,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( leq(X2,X1)
        & leq(X1,X2) )
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_antisym) ).

fof(ord_v0_v16,axiom,
    less(v0,v16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v16) ).

fof(ord_v0_v32,axiom,
    less(v0,v32),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v32) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X31,X32,X33] :
      ( leq(X31,X33)
      | ~ leq(X32,X33)
      | ~ leq(X31,X32) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_trans])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ( leq(X19,X20)
        | X19 != X20 )
      & ( leq(X19,X20)
        | ~ less(X19,X20) )
      & ( X19 = X20
        | less(X19,X20)
        | ~ leq(X19,X20) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X2,X3)
    | ~ leq(X1,X2)
    | leq(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ less(X1,X2)
    | leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ~ ( in_lopen(X3,v0,v16)
            & in_lopen(X2,v0,v800)
            & in_lopen(X1,v0,v1200) )
        & in_lopen(X3,v0,v32)
        & in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)
        & in_lopen(X1,v0,v600) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl350]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( in_lopen(X16,X17,X18)
        | ~ leq(X16,X18)
        | ~ less(X17,X16) )
      & ( ~ in_lopen(X16,X17,X18)
        | leq(X16,X18) )
      & ( ~ in_lopen(X16,X17,X18)
        | less(X17,X16) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_lopen])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ less(X3,X2)
    | ~ leq(X1,X3)
    | leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    less(v16,v600),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v16_v600]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X13,X14,X15] :
      ( ( ~ in_lopen(X15,v0,v32)
        | ~ in_lopen(X14,v0,v400)
        | ~ in_lopen(X13,v0,v600)
        | in_lopen(X15,v0,v16) )
      & ( ~ in_lopen(X15,v0,v32)
        | ~ in_lopen(X14,v0,v400)
        | ~ in_lopen(X13,v0,v600)
        | in_lopen(X14,v0,v800) )
      & ( ~ in_lopen(X15,v0,v32)
        | ~ in_lopen(X14,v0,v400)
        | ~ in_lopen(X13,v0,v600)
        | in_lopen(X13,v0,v1200) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X2,X3)
    | ~ less(X1,X2)
    | in_lopen(X2,X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    leq(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X1,v16)
    | leq(X1,v600) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    less(v16,v32),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v16_v32]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ( v800 != v1200
    & v600 != v1200
    & v600 != v800
    & v400 != v1200
    & v400 != v800
    & v400 != v600
    & v32 != v1200
    & v32 != v800
    & v32 != v600
    & v32 != v400
    & v16 != v1200
    & v16 != v800
    & v16 != v600
    & v16 != v400
    & v16 != v32
    & v0 != v1200
    & v0 != v800
    & v0 != v600
    & v0 != v400
    & v0 != v32
    & v0 != v16 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[distinct]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)
    | ~ in_lopen(X3,v0,v400)
    | ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v600)
    | in_lopen(X1,v0,v16) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ less(X2,X1)
    | in_lopen(X1,X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    less(v0,v400),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v400]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    leq(v16,v600),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( X21 = X22
      | ~ leq(X22,X21)
      | ~ leq(X21,X22) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X1,v16)
    | leq(X1,v32) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ( v800 != v1200
    & v600 != v1200
    & v600 != v800
    & v400 != v1200
    & v400 != v800
    & v400 != v600
    & v32 != v1200
    & v32 != v800
    & v32 != v600
    & v32 != v400
    & v16 != v1200
    & v16 != v800
    & v16 != v600
    & v16 != v400
    & v16 != v32
    & v0 != v1200
    & v0 != v800
    & v0 != v600
    & v0 != v400
    & v0 != v32
    & v0 != v16 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)
    | ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v600)
    | in_lopen(X1,v0,v16) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ less(X1,v16)
    | in_lopen(v16,X1,v600) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    less(v0,v16),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v16]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X2,X1)
    | ~ leq(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    leq(v16,v32),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    v16 != v32,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ in_lopen(X1,X3,X2)
    | leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)
    | in_lopen(X1,v0,v16) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ~ leq(v32,v16),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)
    | leq(X1,v16) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in_lopen(v32,v0,v32),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    less(v0,v32),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v32]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_27]),c_0_44])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT079+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:24:35 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % new_bool_3 with pid 1961488 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/0.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.56  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1961491 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/0.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.56  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 57
% 0.20/0.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 17
% 0.20/0.56  % Initial clauses                      : 66
% 0.20/0.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 66
% 0.20/0.56  % Processed clauses                    : 321
% 0.20/0.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % ...subsumed                          : 139
% 0.20/0.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 182
% 0.20/0.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.20/0.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.20/0.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Generated clauses                    : 762
% 0.20/0.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 652
% 0.20/0.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Paramodulations                      : 759
% 0.20/0.56  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.20/0.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.20/0.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 119
% 0.20/0.56  % ...of those cached                   : 94
% 0.20/0.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 177
% 0.20/0.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 32
% 0.20/0.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 52
% 0.20/0.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 93
% 0.20/0.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 396
% 0.20/0.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1288
% 0.20/0.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.20/0.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 511
% 0.20/0.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 500
% 0.20/0.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 82
% 0.20/0.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 198
% 0.20/0.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 8909
% 0.20/0.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 457
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.56  % User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.20/0.56  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.56  % Total time               : 0.033 s
% 0.20/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 3888 pages
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.56  % User time                : 0.033 s
% 0.20/0.56  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.56  % Total time               : 0.043 s
% 0.20/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.20/0.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------