↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : MGT079+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:13:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 6.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  178 (  35 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   21 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  209 (  97   ~;  66   |;  42   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   22 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   4 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   0 sgn  69   !;   6   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
    <=> ( X0 = X1
        | less(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_def) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X0)
        & leq(X0,X1) )
     => X0 = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_antisym) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less(X0,X1)
     => leq(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',less_implies_leq) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( in_lopen(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ( leq(X0,X2)
        & less(X1,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax',in_lopen) ).

fof(f36,axiom,
    less(v0,v32),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v32) ).

fof(f37,axiom,
    less(v0,v400),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v400) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    less(v0,v600),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v600) ).

fof(f41,axiom,
    less(v16,v32),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v16_v32) ).

fof(f56,axiom,
    ( v800 != v1200
    & v600 != v1200
    & v600 != v800
    & v400 != v1200
    & v400 != v800
    & v400 != v600
    & v32 != v1200
    & v32 != v800
    & v32 != v600
    & v32 != v400
    & v16 != v1200
    & v16 != v800
    & v16 != v600
    & v16 != v400
    & v16 != v32
    & v0 != v1200
    & v0 != v800
    & v0 != v600
    & v0 != v400
    & v0 != v32
    & v0 != v16 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distinct) ).

fof(f57,conjecture,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( in_lopen(X2,v0,v16)
          & in_lopen(X1,v0,v800)
          & in_lopen(X0,v0,v1200) )
      & in_lopen(X2,v0,v32)
      & in_lopen(X1,v0,v400)
      & in_lopen(X0,v0,v600) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl350) ).

fof(f58,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ~ ( in_lopen(X2,v0,v16)
            & in_lopen(X1,v0,v800)
            & in_lopen(X0,v0,v1200) )
        & in_lopen(X2,v0,v32)
        & in_lopen(X1,v0,v400)
        & in_lopen(X0,v0,v600) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f57]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X0)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X0)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( in_lopen(X2,v0,v16)
        & in_lopen(X1,v0,v800)
        & in_lopen(X0,v0,v1200) )
      | ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v32)
      | ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v400)
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v600) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1
        | less(X0,X1) )
      & ( ( X0 != X1
          & ~ less(X0,X1) )
        | leq(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1
        | less(X0,X1) )
      & ( ( X0 != X1
          & ~ less(X0,X1) )
        | leq(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ in_lopen(X0,X1,X2)
        | ( leq(X0,X2)
          & less(X1,X0) ) )
      & ( ~ leq(X0,X2)
        | ~ less(X1,X0)
        | in_lopen(X0,X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ in_lopen(X0,X1,X2)
        | ( leq(X0,X2)
          & less(X1,X0) ) )
      & ( ~ leq(X0,X2)
        | ~ less(X1,X0)
        | in_lopen(X0,X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 != X1
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X0)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in_lopen(X0,X1,X2)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X0,X2)
      | ~ less(X1,X0)
      | in_lopen(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    less(v0,v32),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    less(v0,v400),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    less(v0,v600),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    less(v16,v32),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f154,plain,
    v16 != v32,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( in_lopen(X2,v0,v16)
      | ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v32)
      | ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v400)
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v600) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f164,plain,
    ! [X1] : leq(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f96]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ leq(X1,X0)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in_lopen(X1,X0,X2)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X2)
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).

tcf(c_77,plain,
    less(v0,v32),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

tcf(c_78,plain,
    less(v0,v400),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    less(v0,v600),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    less(v16,v32),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

tcf(c_103,plain,
    v16 != v32,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f154]) ).

tcf(c_120,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in_lopen(X1,v0,v16)
      | ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)
      | ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v600) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f161]) ).

tcf(c_851,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_10
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v400) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[c_120]) ).

tcf(c_852,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_11
      | in_lopen(X0,v0,v16)
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v32) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[c_120]) ).

tcf(c_853,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_12
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v600) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[c_120]) ).

tcf(c_854,negated_conjecture,
    ( iPr_def_12
    | iPr_def_11
    | iPr_def_10 ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_120]) ).

tcf(c_860,negated_conjecture,
    ( iPr_def_12
    | iPr_def_11
    | iPr_def_10 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_854]) ).

tcf(c_862,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in_lopen(X0,v0,v16)
      | ~ iPr_def_11
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v32) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_852]) ).

tcf(c_865,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_12
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v600) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_853]) ).

tcf(c_870,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_10
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v400) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_851]) ).

tcf(c_1513,plain,
    leq(v16,v32),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_2018,plain,
    ( ( v16 = v32 )
    | ~ leq(v32,v16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1513,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_2047,plain,
    ~ leq(v32,v16),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2018,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_2090,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_12
      | ~ leq(X0,v600)
      | ~ less(v0,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_865]) ).

tcf(c_2092,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_10
      | ~ leq(X0,v400)
      | ~ less(v0,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_870]) ).

tcf(c_2161,plain,
    ( ~ iPr_def_12
    | ~ leq(v600,v600) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_2090]) ).

tcf(c_2164,plain,
    ~ iPr_def_12,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2161,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_2166,plain,
    ( iPr_def_11
    | iPr_def_10 ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_860,c_2164]) ).

tcf(c_2189,plain,
    ( ~ iPr_def_10
    | ~ leq(v400,v400) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_2092]) ).

tcf(c_2193,plain,
    ~ iPr_def_10,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2189,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_2194,plain,
    iPr_def_11,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2166,c_2193]) ).

tcf(c_2196,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in_lopen(X0,v0,v16)
      | ~ in_lopen(X0,v0,v32) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_862,c_2194]) ).

tcf(c_2210,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in_lopen(X0,v0,v16)
      | ~ leq(X0,v32)
      | ~ less(v0,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_2196]) ).

tcf(c_2267,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,v16)
      | ~ leq(X0,v32)
      | ~ less(v0,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2210,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_2303,plain,
    ( leq(v32,v16)
    | ~ leq(v32,v32) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_2267]) ).

tcf(c_2308,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2303,c_2047,c_53]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT079+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/5.38  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:20:57 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.44  % Proving...
% 1.26/6.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/6.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.26/6.19  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.26/6.19  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 9 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Proving...
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % 
% 1.26/6.19  % clauses                               77
% 1.26/6.19  % conjectures                           9
% 1.26/6.19  % EPR                                   71
% 1.26/6.19  % Horn                                  68
% 1.26/6.19  % unary                                 51
% 1.26/6.19  % binary                                8
% 1.26/6.19  % lits                                  124
% 1.26/6.19  % lits eq                               40
% 1.26/6.19  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.26/6.19  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.26/6.19  % fd_cond                               3
% 1.26/6.19  % fd_pseudo_cond                        3
% 1.26/6.19  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ 
% 1.26/6.19  % Current options:
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ 
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % 
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % ------ Proving...
% 1.26/6.19  % 
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/6.19  
% 1.26/6.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.26/6.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------