↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT082+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT082+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:18:22 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.13/0.37  # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 0.13/0.37  #
% 0.13/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37  # Number of axioms: 100 Number of unprocessed: 99
% 0.13/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.37  # 99 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are 6 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.37  # Found 64 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.37  # 6 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.37  # 35 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.37  # 64 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6
% 0.13/0.37  # Returning from population with 14 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.37  # We now have 14 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.37  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.37  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.37  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.37  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.37  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.37  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.37  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (val(v0))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (val(v16))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (less(v0,v16))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (is_verdict(conflict))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (val(v32))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (is_verdict(compatible))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (is_verdict(unknown))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (val(v300))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (val(v500))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (less(v0,v32))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (less(v0,v300))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (less(v0,v500))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (less(v0,v600))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (val(v600))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (val(v601))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (leq(X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (less(v0,v601))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (less(v16,v32))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (less(v16,v300))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (less(v16,v500))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (less(v16,v600))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (less(v16,v601))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_64, plain, (less(v32,v300))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (less(v32,v500))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_66, plain, (less(v32,v600))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_67, plain, (less(v32,v601))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_68, plain, (less(v300,v500))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_69, plain, (less(v300,v600))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (less(v300,v601))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_98, negated_conjecture, (less(v300,esk5_0))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (less(v500,v600))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_72, plain, (less(v500,v601))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (less(v600,v601))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_96, negated_conjecture, (leq(v16,esk6_0))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_100, negated_conjecture, (in_closed(esk4_0,v600,v600))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_99, negated_conjecture, (in_closed(esk4_0,v601,v601))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_95, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(esk6_0,v0,v32))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_97, negated_conjecture, (in_open(esk5_0,v0,v500))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (box_verdict(compatible,compatible)=compatible)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_94, plain, (v16!=v0)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (v32!=v0)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (v32!=v16)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_92, plain, (v300!=v0)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (v300!=v16)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (compatible!=conflict)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (unknown!=conflict)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (compatible!=unknown)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_83, plain, (v300!=v32)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (v500!=v0)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_86, plain, (v500!=v16)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_82, plain, (v500!=v32)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_79, plain, (v500!=v300)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (v600!=v0)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_85, plain, (v16!=v600)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_81, plain, (v32!=v600)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (v300!=v600)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (v500!=v600)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (v601!=v0)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_84, plain, (v16!=v601)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_80, plain, (v32!=v601)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (v300!=v601)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (v500!=v601)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (v601!=v600)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~less(X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X1=unknown|X1=compatible|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_ropen(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_open(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_open(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|less(X1,X2)|less(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_ropen(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X2,X1)|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|less(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~less(X3,X2)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,X3)|~less(X3,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X2)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X2)|~leq(X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (box_verdict(X1,conflict)=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (in_closed(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X1,X3)|~leq(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (in_lopen(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X1,X3)|~less(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (in_ropen(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X2,X1)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (in_open(X1,X2,X3)|~less(X1,X3)|~less(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (box_verdict(conflict,X1)=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (box_verdict(X1,unknown)=unknown|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (axis_subsumes(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (in_closed(X1,X2,X3)|~axis_subsumes(X4,X5,X2,X3)|~in_closed(X1,X4,X5))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (in_closed(esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4)|~axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (box_verdict(unknown,X1)=unknown|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (in_closed(esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2)|~axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (box_verdict(X1,X2)=unknown|box_verdict(X1,X2)=compatible|box_verdict(X1,X2)=conflict|~is_verdict(X2)|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (axis_subsumes(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.37  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.37  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.37  # Found 5 steps
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_99, negated_conjecture, (in_closed(esk4_0,v601,v601)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_110, plain, (in_closed(esk4_0,v601,v601)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_357, plain, (~in_closed(esk4_0,v601,v601)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_99])).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_355, plain, (~axis_conflict(v601,v601,v601,v601)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.13/0.37  cnf(i_0_473, plain, (in_closed(esk1_4(v601,v601,v601,v601),v601,v601)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_473, ...])).
% 0.13/0.37  # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.37  # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.37  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.38  # Child (1833923) has found a proof.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------