↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : MGT083+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:08:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 13.40s 4.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( less(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X3,X2)
    | ~ less(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4qhoj2qn/input.p',i_0_35) ).

cnf(i_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    less(v600,esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4qhoj2qn/input.p',i_0_32) ).

cnf(i_0_18,plain,
    ( less(X1,X2)
    | ~ in_open(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4qhoj2qn/input.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    in_open(esk4_0,v0,v600),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4qhoj2qn/input.p',i_0_33) ).

cnf(i_0_23,plain,
    ~ less(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4qhoj2qn/input.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( less(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X3,X2)
    | ~ less(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    less(v600,esk4_0),
    i_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( less(X1,X2)
    | ~ in_open(X1,X3,X2) ),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    in_open(esk4_0,v0,v600),
    i_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ~ less(X1,X1),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( less(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ less(X1,v600) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    less(esk4_0,v600),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT083+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:20:17 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.12/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.12/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 13.40/4.02  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 13.40/4.02  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 13.40/4.02  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 13.40/4.02  
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof found!
% 13.40/4.02  # SZS status Theorem
% 13.40/4.02  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object total steps             : 13
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object clause steps            : 8
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 2
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 13.40/4.02  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 13.40/4.02  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.40/4.02  # Parsed axioms                        : 38
% 13.40/4.02  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Initial clauses                      : 38
% 13.40/4.02  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 38
% 13.40/4.02  # Processed clauses                    : 41
% 13.40/4.02  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 13.40/4.02  # ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 13.40/4.02  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 13.40/4.02  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Generated clauses                    : 46
% 13.40/4.02  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 30
% 13.40/4.02  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Paramodulations                      : 43
% 13.40/4.02  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 13.40/4.02  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 13.40/4.02  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Current number of processed clauses  : 39
% 13.40/4.02  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 13.40/4.02  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 13.40/4.02  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 13.40/4.02  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
% 13.40/4.02  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 13.40/4.02  # ...number of literals in the above   : 68
% 13.40/4.02  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 110
% 13.40/4.02  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 100
% 13.40/4.02  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 13.40/4.02  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 13.40/4.02  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 13.40/4.02  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 13.40/4.02  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 970
% 13.40/4.02  
% 13.40/4.02  # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.40/4.02  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 13.40/4.02  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 13.40/4.02  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 13.40/4.02  # ...preprocessing         : 0.015 s
% 13.40/4.02  # ...main loop             : 0.002 s
% 13.40/4.02  # Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 13.40/4.02  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------