↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT083+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT083+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:20:27 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/0.55  
% 0.26/0.55  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.26/0.55  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.26/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.26/0.55  SPASS derived 14 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 60 clauses.
% 0.26/0.55  SPASS allocated 98012 KBytes.
% 0.26/0.55  SPASS spent	0:00:00.17 on the problem.
% 0.26/0.55  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.26/0.55  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.26/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.26/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.26/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.26/0.55  
% 0.26/0.55  
% 0.26/0.55  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.26/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.26/0.55  6[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v600,skc1)*r.
% 0.26/0.55  8[0:Inp] ||  -> in_open(skc1,v0,v600)*.
% 0.26/0.55  10[0:Inp] || less(u,u)* -> .
% 0.26/0.55  24[0:Inp] || in_open(u,v,w)* -> less(u,w).
% 0.26/0.55  28[0:Inp] || less(u,v)* less(v,w)* -> less(u,w)*.
% 0.26/0.55  54[0:Res:8.0,24.0] ||  -> less(skc1,v600)*l.
% 0.26/0.55  65[0:NCh:28.2,28.1,10.0,6.0] || less(skc1,v600)*l -> .
% 0.26/0.55  67[0:MRR:65.0,54.0] ||  -> .
% 0.26/0.55  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.26/0.55  Formulae used in the proof : odrl423 irreflexive in_open transitive
% 0.26/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------