↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : MGT084+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:03:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.46s 2.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (   9   ~;   5   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  11 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;  10 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (  16   !;   3   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ axis_subsumes > axis_conflict > axis_compatible > in_ropen > in_open > in_lopen > in_closed > less > leq > val > is_verdict > box_verdict > #nlpp > v600 > v400 > v200 > v0 > unknown > conflict > compatible > #skF_5 > #skF_2 > #skF_6 > #skF_4 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(is_verdict,type,
    is_verdict: $i > $o ).

tff(axis_conflict,type,
    axis_conflict: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(v0,type,
    v0: $i ).

tff(in_lopen,type,
    in_lopen: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(box_verdict,type,
    box_verdict: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(unknown,type,
    unknown: $i ).

tff(in_ropen,type,
    in_ropen: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(in_open,type,
    in_open: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(val,type,
    val: $i > $o ).

tff(v200,type,
    v200: $i ).

tff(compatible,type,
    compatible: $i ).

tff(less,type,
    less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff(v400,type,
    v400: $i ).

tff(in_closed,type,
    in_closed: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(axis_subsumes,type,
    axis_subsumes: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(v600,type,
    v600: $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(axis_compatible,type,
    axis_compatible: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(conflict,type,
    conflict: $i ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ less(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',irreflexive) ).

tff(f_309,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [X,Y,Z] :
          ( in_lopen(X,v0,v600)
          & leq(v600,X)
          & in_lopen(Y,v0,v400)
          & less(v400,Y)
          & in_lopen(Z,v0,v200)
          & leq(v200,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl432) ).

tff(f_165,axiom,
    ! [X,A,B] :
      ( in_lopen(X,A,B)
    <=> ( less(A,X)
        & leq(X,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax',in_lopen) ).

tff(f_94,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( less(X,Y)
     => leq(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',less_implies_leq) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( leq(X,Y)
        & leq(Y,X) )
     => ( X = Y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_antisym) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ~ less(X_1,X_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_130,plain,
    in_lopen('#skF_5',v0,v400),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_309]) ).

tff(c_260,plain,
    ! [X_91,B_92,A_93] :
      ( leq(X_91,B_92)
      | ~ in_lopen(X_91,A_93,B_92) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_165]) ).

tff(c_271,plain,
    leq('#skF_5',v400),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_260]) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    less(v400,'#skF_5'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_309]) ).

tff(c_200,plain,
    ! [X_68,Y_69] :
      ( leq(X_68,Y_69)
      | ~ less(X_68,Y_69) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_94]) ).

tff(c_224,plain,
    leq(v400,'#skF_5'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_200]) ).

tff(c_273,plain,
    ! [Y_94,X_95] :
      ( ( Y_94 = X_95 )
      | ~ leq(Y_94,X_95)
      | ~ leq(X_95,Y_94) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_299,plain,
    ( ( v400 = '#skF_5' )
    | ~ leq('#skF_5',v400) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_224,c_273]) ).

tff(c_338,plain,
    v400 = '#skF_5',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_271,c_299]) ).

tff(c_441,plain,
    less('#skF_5','#skF_5'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_338,c_128]) ).

tff(c_449,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_441]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT084+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:20:47 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.46/2.32  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.46/2.32  
% 5.46/2.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------