%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem : MGT084+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:38 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.53s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT084+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 14:21:30 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/0.47 start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.53 % Version : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.25/0.53 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.53 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.53 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.25/0.53 fof(odrl432, conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2, X3]:((((((in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)&leq(v600,X1))&in_lopen(X2,v0,v400))&less(v400,X2))&in_lopen(X3,v0,v200))&leq(v200,X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl432)).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(in_lopen, axiom, ![X1, X4, X5]:((in_lopen(X1,X4,X5)<=>(less(X4,X1)&leq(X1,X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax', in_lopen)).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(leq_antisym, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((leq(X1,X2)&leq(X2,X1))=>X1=X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_antisym)).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(leq_def, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((leq(X1,X2)<=>(less(X1,X2)|X1=X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_def)).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(irreflexive, axiom, ![X1]:(~(less(X1,X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', irreflexive)).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X1, X2, X3]:((((((in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)&leq(v600,X1))&in_lopen(X2,v0,v400))&less(v400,X2))&in_lopen(X3,v0,v200))&leq(v200,X3))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl432])).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X31, X32, X33]:((((less(X32,X31)|~in_lopen(X31,X32,X33))&(leq(X31,X33)|~in_lopen(X31,X32,X33)))&(~less(X32,X31)|~leq(X31,X33)|in_lopen(X31,X32,X33)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_lopen])])])])).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (((((in_lopen(esk1_0,v0,v600)&leq(v600,esk1_0))&in_lopen(esk2_0,v0,v400))&less(v400,esk2_0))&in_lopen(esk3_0,v0,v200))&leq(v200,esk3_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X18, X19]:((~leq(X18,X19)|~leq(X19,X18)|X18=X19)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])])])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_9, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X1,X3,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(esk2_0,v0,v400)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk2_0,v400)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X16, X17]:(((~leq(X16,X17)|(less(X16,X17)|X16=X17))&((~less(X16,X17)|leq(X16,X17))&(X16!=X17|leq(X16,X17))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])])])).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(c_0_14, plain, ![X1]:(~less(X1,X1)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexive])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (esk2_0=v400|~leq(v400,esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (less(v400,esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
% 0.25/0.53 fof(c_0_18, plain, ![X34]:(~less(X34,X34)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (esk2_0=v400), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17])])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_20, plain, (~less(X1,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
% 0.25/0.53 cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_19]), c_0_20]), ['proof']).
% 0.25/0.53 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.25/0.53 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.25/0.53 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.53 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.25/0.53 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.25/0.53 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.53 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/0.53
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------