↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : MGT086+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:48:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.32s 1.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  51   ~;  46   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   2 sgn  21   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(odrl462,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(v800,X1)
      & in_lopen(X2,v0,v200)
      & ( ( in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)
          & ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v400) )
        | ( ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)
          & in_lopen(X2,v0,v400) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl462) ).

fof(in_lopen,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4,X5] :
      ( in_lopen(X1,X4,X5)
    <=> ( less(X4,X1)
        & leq(X1,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax',in_lopen) ).

fof(leq_def,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> ( less(X1,X2)
        | X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_def) ).

fof(irreflexive,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',irreflexive) ).

fof(transitive,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( less(X1,X2)
        & less(X2,X3) )
     => less(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',transitive) ).

fof(ord_v0_v200,axiom,
    less(v0,v200),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v200) ).

fof(ord_v600_v800,axiom,
    less(v600,v800),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v600_v800) ).

fof(ord_v200_v400,axiom,
    less(v200,v400),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v200_v400) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2] :
        ( leq(v800,X1)
        & in_lopen(X2,v0,v200)
        & ( ( in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)
            & ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v400) )
          | ( ~ in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)
            & in_lopen(X2,v0,v400) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl462])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X144,X145] :
      ( ( ~ in_lopen(X144,v0,v600)
        | in_lopen(X145,v0,v400)
        | ~ leq(v800,X144)
        | ~ in_lopen(X145,v0,v200) )
      & ( in_lopen(X144,v0,v600)
        | ~ in_lopen(X145,v0,v400)
        | ~ leq(v800,X144)
        | ~ in_lopen(X145,v0,v200) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X96,X97,X98] :
      ( ( less(X97,X96)
        | ~ in_lopen(X96,X97,X98) )
      & ( leq(X96,X98)
        | ~ in_lopen(X96,X97,X98) )
      & ( ~ less(X97,X96)
        | ~ leq(X96,X98)
        | in_lopen(X96,X97,X98) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_lopen])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)
    | ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)
    | ~ leq(v800,X1)
    | ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v200) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in_lopen(X2,X1,X3)
    | ~ less(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( less(X1,X2)
    | ~ in_lopen(X2,X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X78,X79] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X78,X79)
        | less(X78,X79)
        | X78 = X79 )
      & ( ~ less(X78,X79)
        | leq(X78,X79) )
      & ( X78 != X79
        | leq(X78,X79) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)
    | ~ in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)
    | ~ leq(v800,X1)
    | ~ leq(X2,v200) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)
    | ~ leq(v800,X1)
    | ~ leq(X2,v200)
    | ~ leq(X2,v400)
    | ~ less(v0,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    leq(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexive]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X73,X74,X75] :
      ( ~ less(X73,X74)
      | ~ less(X74,X75)
      | less(X73,X75) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[transitive])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( in_lopen(v800,v0,v600)
    | ~ leq(X1,v200)
    | ~ leq(X1,v400)
    | ~ less(v0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    less(v0,v200),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v200]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X72] : ~ less(X72,X72),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( less(X1,X3)
    | ~ less(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    less(v600,v800),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v600_v800]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ in_lopen(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( in_lopen(v800,v0,v600)
    | ~ leq(v200,v400) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ less(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( less(X1,v800)
    | ~ less(X1,v600) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( less(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(v800,v600)
    | ~ leq(v200,v400) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ~ less(v800,v600),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( v800 = v600
    | ~ leq(v200,v400) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    less(v200,v400),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v200_v400]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    v800 = v600,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_36]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : MGT086+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 23:33:16 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.32/1.64  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.32/1.64  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/1.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/1.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/1.64  % Total time : 1.276s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------